NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

16-Civ-A5 Hydraulic Engineering: May 2013

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

  1. Question 1 Two-reservoir supply to a demand node
  2. Question 2 Ten-pipe network between two reservoirs
  3. Question 3 Two pumps and a 6-km pipeline over a hill
  4. Question 4 Quasi-steady simulation of two draining tanks
  5. Question 5 River blockage by a slope failure
  6. Question 6 Compound flood-protection channel

Start with Question 1 →

Paper: National Exams — 98-Civ-A5 Hydraulic Engineering, May 2013 · 3 hours, closed book (one aid sheet). Six questions; any five constitute a complete paper — all six are solved here as a study resource. All parts of a question are of equal value.

Reference texts. Mays, Water Resources Engineering, 3rd ed. (pipe systems, pumps, network analysis); Chow, Open-Channel Hydraulics (Manning flow, compound sections); Crowe, Elger & Roberson, Engineering Fluid Mechanics (energy/continuity). Exam-supplied relations used throughout: Hazen–Williams $Q=0.278\,C\,D^{2.63}\,S^{0.54}$ with $S=h_f/L$ (SI), Manning $Q=\tfrac{1}{n}A\,R^{2/3}\,S^{1/2}$, and total dynamic head $\text{TDH}=H_s+H_f$. Unless stated, local losses and velocity head are neglected, and water has $\rho=1000\ \text{kg/m}^3$.

Check (Q4 data consistency): the pipe/valve data in Question 4 are internally inconsistent — the stated “initial valve flow = 400 L/s” corresponds to a node head of only 9.5 m, but the two supply pipes driven by the 96 m and 89 m tank levels deliver far more than that at 9.5 m. Continuity at the node fixes a network-consistent initial discharge of ≈693 L/s at a node head of ≈28.4 m. The simulation below is run from that physically consistent state, with the discrepancy noted (per Note 1, candidates may state assumptions).