NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

16-Civ-B17 Intelligent Transportation Systems: December 2017

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

  1. Question 1 The Definition of ITS, the National Architecture Interface, and the User-Service Bundles
  2. Question 2 An ITS Programme for Urban Arterial Signal Systems
  3. Question 3 A Proposal for an Advanced Traffic Management System
  4. Question 4 Extending the Proposal to an Advanced Traveller Information System
  5. Question 5 Advanced Public Transportation Systems and Transit Priority

Start with Question 1 →

Paper format. National Examinations, December 2017 — 16-Civ-B17 Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS). Three-hour, open-book examination; any non-communicating calculator is permitted. Five questions are printed and the paper directs that all five be answered, all carrying equal weight, so each question is worth 20 points and the paper totals 100. The printed grading scheme is Q.1 (a) 2+8, (b) 10; Q.2 20; Q.3 20; Q.4 20; Q.5 (a) 12, (b) 8. The paper further directs that answers be given in essay format supplemented by illustrations (such as flow charts, process diagrams, etc.) and states that clarity and organization of the answer are important — presentation is itself examined here, which is why every answer below carries a purpose-built diagram. Candidates are invited to state any assumption made where the interpretation of a question is in doubt.

Reference texts.

Source note — the marks line in Q.1(a). The paper prints the marks for Question 1(a) as “(2+8 = points)”: the total has dropped out in printing. The arithmetic and the paper's own instruction that all questions carry equal weight fix the value: 2 + 8 = 10 points for (a), 10 points for (b), 20 points for Question 1. The answer below is proportioned accordingly.

Canadian context. Question 1(a) explicitly asks for the U.S. National ITS Architecture, so that is what is answered there, in the architecture's own vocabulary. Everywhere the paper does not name a jurisdiction — Questions 2 to 5, which are set in “a Municipality” — the answer is written in the Canadian frame: the ITS Architecture for Canada, MUTCDC devices and signal practice, TAC geometric guidance, provincial highway and privacy legislation, and Canadian transit examples.