undated (16-Nav-A1) - Fundamentals of Naval Architecture
Reference texts: Tupper, Introduction to Naval Architecture; Lewis (ed.), Principles of Naval Architecture (PNA); IMO, International Code on Intact Stability (IS Code).
it mislabels the paper "16-Nov-A1, Thermodynamics" and bleeds in fragments from unrelated exams (18-Nav-A2, 16-Nav-A2, 16-Nav-A3).
Question 1: Maximum Deck Load and Hydrostatics of a Triangular Wall-Sided Barge
Given. A wall-sided (vertical-sided) barge whose waterplane, in plan, is a triangle: a point apex at the bow and the full 16 m beam at the stern, 80 m long. Because the sides are vertical, this triangular waterplane shape — and hence its area, LCF and moments of inertia — is the same at every draft up to the 6 m depth.
Given data
Quantity
Symbol
Value
Length
$L$
80 m
Maximum beam (at stern)
$B_{max}$
16 m
Depth
$D$
6 m
Minimum summer freeboard
$fb$
1.2 m
Light-ship draft
$d_{light}$
2.1 m
Light-ship $KG$
$KG_{light}$
3.10 m
Design draft (part a, b)
$d$
4.0 m
Check: water density is not stated for this question (Q4 on the same paper states 1.035 t/m³ for a different scenario); the standard summer-freeboard convention is saltwater at $\rho=1.025$ t/m³, used throughout this question.
Find. (i) the maximum deck load and the highest permissible $KG$ of that load; (ii) at $d=4$ m, the tons-per-metre immersion and the longitudinal centre of flotation.
Plan view of the waterplane: an isosceles triangle, apex at the bow, 16 m base at the stern — the same shape at every draft because the hull is wall-sided.
Approach. Get the (draft-independent) waterplane area and its transverse/longitudinal moments of inertia from the triangle formulas on the paper's own reference sheet; use Archimedes' principle at the freeboard-limited maximum draft and at the light-ship draft to get the maximum deck load, then use the metacentre at that maximum draft as the ship's absolute ceiling on overall $KG$ to back out the highest permissible $KG$ of the load itself.
Waterplane area (constant for all drafts $\le D$). A triangle of base $B_{max}=16$ m and height $L=80$ m:
$$A_W=\tfrac12 B_{max}L=\tfrac12(16)(80)=640\text{ m}^2$$
Maximum permissible draft and displacements. Summer draft is depth less minimum freeboard:
$$d_{max}=D-fb=6-1.2=4.8\text{ m}$$
$$\Delta_{light}=\rho A_W d_{light}=1.025(640)(2.1)=1377.6\text{ t},\qquad \Delta_{max}=\rho A_W d_{max}=1.025(640)(4.8)=3148.8\text{ t}$$
$$\boxed{W_{load}=\Delta_{max}-\Delta_{light}=3148.8-1377.6\approx1771.2\text{ t}}$$
Transverse $BM$ and $KM$ at the maximum draft. Using the reference triangle with base $b=16$ m, apex offset $a=b/2=8$ m (isosceles), height $h=L=80$ m, the centroidal transverse moment of inertia (about the ship's centreline) is $\bar I_y=\tfrac{bh}{36}(a^2+b^2-ab)$:
$$I_T=\frac{16(80)}{36}\!\left(8^2+16^2-8(16)\right)=6826.7\text{ m}^4$$
At $d_{max}=4.8$ m, $V_{max}=A_W d_{max}=3072\text{ m}^3$, and since the hull is wall-sided (rectangular cross-section at every station) $KB=d/2$:
$$KB_{max}=2.4\text{ m},\quad BM_{T,max}=\frac{I_T}{V_{max}}=\frac{6826.7}{3072}\approx2.222\text{ m},\quad KM_{T,max}=KB_{max}+BM_{T,max}\approx4.622\text{ m}$$
Highest permissible $KG$ of the load. The absolute ceiling on the loaded ship's $KG$ is $KM_{T,max}$ (the $GM=0$ limit); balance moments of weight about the keel between the light ship and the deck load:
$$\Delta_{max}\,KM_{T,max}=\Delta_{light}\,KG_{light}+W_{load}\,KG_{load}$$
$$\boxed{KG_{load}=\frac{\Delta_{max}KM_{T,max}-\Delta_{light}KG_{light}}{W_{load}}=\frac{3148.8(4.622)-1377.6(3.10)}{1771.2}\approx5.81\text{ m above the keel}}$$
Part (a): tons per metre immersion at $d=4$ m. Because $A_W$ is the same at every draft, $TPM$ is too — the classic wall-sided-hull property that TPM does not depend on draft:
$$\boxed{TPM=\rho A_W=1.025(640)=656\text{ t/m}}$$
Part (b): centre of flotation at $d=4$ m. The centroid of a triangle lies $h/3$ from its base; here the "base" (widest end) is the stern, so:
$$\boxed{LCF=\frac{L}{3}=\frac{80}{3}\approx26.67\text{ m forward of the stern}\ (\approx53.33\text{ m aft of the bow})}$$
Question 1 — final results
Quantity
Value
Waterplane area $A_W$ (all drafts)
640 m$^2$
Maximum deck load
$\approx1771.2$ t
Highest permissible $KG$ of that load
$\approx5.81$ m above keel
TPM at $d=4$ m (and any draft)
656 t/m
LCF at $d=4$ m (and any draft)
$\approx26.67$ m fwd of stern
Question 2: Trim Angle from Shifting a Weight Toward the Bow
Given. The same triangular wall-sided barge, at the light-ship draft, floating at even keel. An 80 t weight already aboard, at amidships, is moved 25 m toward the bow.
Given data
Quantity
Symbol
Value
Light-ship draft
$d_{light}$
2.1 m
Light-ship $KG$
$KG_{light}$
3.10 m
Weight shifted
$w$
80 t
Shift distance
$s$
25 m, toward the bow
Find. The resulting trim angle.
Profile schematic (not to scale): shifting the weight toward the bow trims the barge by the head (bow deeper).
Approach. Get $MT1m$ from the longitudinal $BM$ and $KG$ at the light-ship draft, find the total change of trim from the shift's moment, then convert to an angle over the barge's length.
Longitudinal moment of inertia (constant, as in Q1). Using $\bar I_x=\tfrac{bh^3}{36}$ with $b=B_{max}=16$ m, $h=L=80$ m (independent of the apex offset $a$):
$$I_L=\frac{16(80)^3}{36}\approx227{,}556\text{ m}^4$$
$BM_L$, $KM_L$, $GM_L$ at the light-ship draft. $V_{light}=A_W d_{light}=640(2.1)=1344\text{ m}^3$, $KB_{light}=d_{light}/2=1.05$ m:
$$BM_{L,light}=\frac{227{,}556}{1344}\approx169.31\text{ m},\qquad GM_{L,light}=KB_{light}+BM_{L,light}-KG_{light}\approx1.05+169.31-3.10\approx167.26\text{ m}$$
Moment to trim 1 m and change of trim.
$$MT1m=\frac{\Delta_{light}\,GM_{L,light}}{L}=\frac{1377.6(167.26)}{80}\approx2880.3\text{ t}\cdot\text{m/m}$$
$$\text{Trimming moment}=w\,s=80(25)=2000\text{ t}\cdot\text{m}\ \Rightarrow\ COT=\frac{2000}{2880.3}\approx0.694\text{ m}$$
Trim angle.
$$\boxed{\theta=\arctan\!\left(\frac{COT}{L}\right)=\arctan\!\left(\frac{0.694}{80}\right)\approx0.497^\circ\text{ (by the head)}}$$
Question 2 — final results
Quantity
Value
$GM_L$ (light-ship)
$\approx167.26$ m
$MT1m$ (light-ship)
$\approx2880$ t·m/m
Change of trim
$\approx0.694$ m
Trim angle
$\approx0.497^\circ$, by the head
Question 3: KG from an Inclining Experiment (Least-Squares Fit)
Given. Five (moment, list-angle) pairs from moving a known weight across the deck, plus the ship's $KM$ and its displacement as tested (with the 35 LT inclining gear aboard, at 39 ft above the keel).
Given data
Quantity
Symbol
Value
Displacement (with gear aboard)
$\Delta$
3900 LT
Transverse metacentric height
$KM$
24.5 ft
Inclining gear weight
$w_g$
35 LT
Inclining gear $KG$
$kg_g$
39 ft
Readings
$(M,\theta)$
see table above (5 pairs)
Find. $GM$ from the plotted data, then the ship's $KG$ corrected for removal of the inclining gear after the test.
Inclining-moment vs. list-angle readings (blue points, corrected for the pre-existing list) and the least-squares best-fit line through the origin (red).
Approach. Correct every reading for the small permanent list observed at zero applied moment, fit a straight line of $\tan\theta$ against moment through the corrected origin, take $GM$ from its slope, recover $KG$ from $KM-GM$, then strip out the temporary inclining gear's contribution to get the ship's true $KG$.
Correct for the initial list. At zero applied moment the ship already lists $0.2^\circ$ to port; subtract this offset (add $0.2^\circ$, taking starboard positive) from every reading:
$$\begin{aligned}
(910,\,2.7)&\to(910,\,2.9^\circ)\qquad(575,\,1.4)\to(575,\,1.6^\circ)\qquad(0,\,-0.2)\to(0,\,0^\circ)\\
(-541,\,-1.8)&\to(-541,\,-1.6^\circ)\qquad(-882,\,-2.5)&\to(-882,\,-2.3^\circ)
\end{aligned}$$
Least-squares slope through the origin. For small angles $\tan\theta=M/(\Delta\,GM)$, so plotting $\tan\theta$ against $M$ gives a line of slope $1/(\Delta\,GM)$ through the origin:
$$\text{slope}=\frac{\sum M_i\tan\theta_i}{\sum M_i^2}\approx5.055\times10^{-5}\ \text{ft}^{-1}\cdot\text{LT}^{-1}$$
Experimental $GM$ and $KG$ as inclined.
$$GM=\frac{1}{\Delta\cdot\text{slope}}=\frac{1}{3900(5.055\times10^{-5})}\approx5.07\text{ ft},\qquad KG_{inclined}=KM-GM=24.5-5.07\approx19.43\text{ ft}$$
Correct for removal of the inclining gear. The 35 LT of temporary gear (part of the 3900 LT tested) is removed after the test; take moments about the keel to strip it out:
$$KG_{ship}=\frac{\Delta\,KG_{inclined}-w_g\,kg_g}{\Delta-w_g}=\frac{3900(19.43)-35(39)}{3865}\approx19.25\text{ ft}$$
$$\boxed{GM\approx5.07\text{ ft},\qquad KG_{ship}\approx19.25\text{ ft (gear removed)}}$$
Given. The same triangular barge as Q1, at draft 4 m, with an empty, full-width, 5 m compartment at the extreme stern opened to the sea. Because the flooded compartment stays open to the sea, displacement and $KG$ are unchanged — this is a lost-buoyancy problem — but because the hull tapers, the flooded strip is a trapezoid (beam 16 m at the transom, 15 m at 5 m forward of it), not a rectangle.
Given data
Quantity
Symbol
Value
Draft before flooding
$d_0$
4.0 m
$KG$
$KG$
2.5 m
Flooded compartment length (stern-end)
$l_c$
5.0 m
Permeability
$\mu$
85% (0.85)
Water density
$\rho$
1.035 t/m$^3$
Find. The new forward and aft drafts after flooding, by the lost-buoyancy method.
Profile schematic (not to scale): the stern-end compartment ($l_c=5$ m, $\mu=0.85$) is open to the sea, shifting the intact centre of flotation $F_1$ forward and trimming the barge by the stern.
Approach. Displacement and $KG$ stay fixed. Using bow-referenced station $\xi$ ($0$–$80$ m, beam $B(\xi)=0.2\xi$), find the flooded strip's area and centroid by integration, subtract $\mu$ times the strip from the full triangle to get the intact waterplane, find the new parallel draft, the new $LCF_1$, and the intact $I_L$ about $F_1$, then trim about $F_1$ until the (unmoved) $G$ realigns under the shifted centre of buoyancy.
Flooded strip (stern-end, $\xi=75$ to $80$). $B(\xi)=0.2\xi$, so:
$$a_{strip}=\int_{75}^{80}0.2\xi\,d\xi=0.1(80^2-75^2)=77.5\text{ m}^2,\qquad \bar\xi_{strip}=\frac{\int_{75}^{80}0.2\xi^2\,d\xi}{a_{strip}}=\frac{0.2(80^3-75^3)/3}{77.5}\approx77.53\text{ m from the bow}$$
Intact waterplane area and new parallel draft. Effective area lost is $\mu\,a_{strip}=0.85(77.5)=65.9\text{ m}^2$:
$$A_1=A_W-\mu\,a_{strip}=640-65.9\approx574.1\text{ m}^2,\qquad d_1=\frac{V_0}{A_1}=\frac{2560}{574.1}\approx4.459\text{ m}$$
New centre of flotation $F_1$. The full triangle's own centroid is $\xi_{F0}=\tfrac{2}{3}L\approx53.33$ m from the bow; removing $\mu\,a_{strip}$ at $\bar\xi_{strip}$:
$$\xi_{F_1}=\frac{A_W\,\xi_{F0}-\mu\,a_{strip}\,\bar\xi_{strip}}{A_1}=\frac{640(53.33)-0.85(77.5)(77.53)}{574.1}\approx50.56\text{ m from the bow}\ (\approx29.44\text{ m fwd of the stern})$$
Longitudinal inertia of the intact waterplane about $F_1$, and $MT1m$. Working all second moments about the bow ($I=\int\xi^2 B(\xi)\,d\xi$) then shifting once to $F_1$:
$$I_{full,bow}=I_L+A_W\,\xi_{F0}^2\approx2{,}048{,}000\text{ m}^4,\quad I_{strip,bow}=\int_{75}^{80}0.2\xi^3\,d\xi\approx465{,}969\text{ m}^4$$
$$I_{L,1,about\ bow}=I_{full,bow}-\mu\,I_{strip,bow}\approx1{,}651{,}927\text{ m}^4,\qquad I_{L,1,about\ F_1}=I_{L,1,about\ bow}-A_1\,\xi_{F_1}^2\approx184{,}436\text{ m}^4$$
With $KB_1=d_1/2\approx2.229$ m and $BM_{L,1}=I_{L,1,about\ F_1}/V_0\approx72.05$ m:
$$GM_{L,1}=KB_1+BM_{L,1}-KG\approx2.229+72.05-2.5\approx71.77\text{ m},\qquad MT1m=\frac{\Delta\,GM_{L,1}}{L}\approx\frac{2649.6(71.77)}{80}\approx2377\text{ t}\cdot\text{m/m}$$
Change of trim and new drafts. $G$ is unmoved at $\xi_{F0}=53.33$ m, aft of the new $F_1$ (50.56 m); the resulting moment trims the barge by the stern:
$$\text{Trimming moment}=\Delta\,|\xi_{F0}-\xi_{F_1}|=2649.6(2.78)\approx7355\text{ t}\cdot\text{m}\ \Rightarrow\ COT=\frac{7355}{2377}\approx3.094\text{ m}$$
Apportioning about $F_1$ ($l_F\approx50.56$ m to the bow, $l_A\approx29.44$ m to the stern):
$$\boxed{d_F=d_1-COT\cdot\frac{l_F}{L}\approx4.459-1.955\approx2.50\text{ m},\qquad d_A=d_1+COT\cdot\frac{l_A}{L}\approx4.459+1.139\approx5.60\text{ m}}$$
Question 4 — final results
Quantity
Value
Method
Lost buoyancy (compartment open to the sea)
New parallel draft $d_1$
$\approx4.459$ m
New centre of flotation $F_1$
$\approx29.44$ m fwd of stern
New moment to trim 1 m
$\approx2377$ t·m/m
New forward draft
$\approx2.50$ m
New aft draft
$\approx5.60$ m
Question 5: Correcting the GZ Curve for the Actual Loading Condition
Check: the given curve reads $GZ(0^\circ)=-0.055$ m, not the $0$ required by definition (a symmetric hull has zero righting arm at zero heel) — the same kind of small scatter as the pre-existing list in Q3. It is transcribed exactly as printed and carried through the correction formula, but $GM$ is read from the curve's near-origin slope ($GZ(15^\circ)/\sin15^\circ$) rather than from this anomalous point.
Given. A static-stability ($GZ$) curve computed for an assumed $KG=6.5\text{ m}$, and the ship's actual weight distribution before sailing, from which the true $KG$ differs from the assumed value.
Given data
Quantity
Symbol
Value
Assumed $KG$ (curve as given)
$KG_{assumed}$
6.5 m
Total displacement
$\Delta$
$4200+9100+1500+200=15{,}000$ t
$GZ(\theta)$, assumed curve
—
tabulated above, $\theta=0$–$90^\circ$
Find. The corrected $GZ$ curve, $GM$ read from it, the angle of vanishing stability, the angle of maximum stability, and the maximum righting moment.
Static stability curves: assumed $KG=6.5\text{ m}$ (grey, dashed) and corrected for the actual loading, $KG\approx6.14\text{ m}$ (blue, solid). The dashed red line is the theoretical tangent at the origin, whose slope gives $GM$.
Approach. Find the actual $KG$ by taking moments of the loading condition about the keel, apply the standard small-angle $KG$-correction to every point of the given $GZ$ curve, then read $GM$, the vanishing-stability angle, and the maximum-$GZ$ angle off the corrected curve.
Actual $KG$ for the loading condition.
$$KG_{actual}=\frac{4200(6.0)+9100(7.0)+1500(1.1)+200(7.5)}{15{,}000}=\frac{92{,}050}{15{,}000}\approx6.137\text{ m}$$
Correct the GZ curve for the KG difference. $KG_{actual}
$GM$ from the corrected curve. Since the origin must theoretically be $(0^\circ,0)$, take the slope from the first genuine reading:
$$GM\approx\frac{GZ(15^\circ)}{\sin15^\circ}=\frac{0.204}{0.2588}\approx0.788\text{ m}$$
Angle of vanishing stability. $GZ_{actual}$ is still positive at $75^\circ$ ($0.301\text{ m}$) but negative at $90^\circ$ ($-0.267\text{ m}$); interpolating linearly for the zero crossing:
$$\theta_{vanish}=75+15\left(\frac{0.301}{0.301+0.267}\right)\approx83.0^\circ$$
Angle of maximum stability and maximum righting moment. The corrected curve peaks at the tabulated $45^\circ$ point ($GZ_{max}\approx0.837\text{ m}$):
$$\boxed{GM\approx0.79\text{ m},\quad \theta_{vanish}\approx83.0^\circ,\quad \theta_{max}\approx45^\circ,\quad M_{max}=\Delta\cdot GZ_{max}\approx15{,}000(0.837)\approx12{,}554\text{ t}\cdot\text{m}}$$