NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

undated (16-Nav-A1) - Fundamentals of Naval Architecture

Reference texts: Tupper, Introduction to Naval Architecture; Lewis (ed.), Principles of Naval Architecture (PNA); IMO, International Code on Intact Stability (IS Code).

it mislabels the paper "16-Nov-A1, Thermodynamics" and bleeds in fragments from unrelated exams (18-Nav-A2, 16-Nav-A2, 16-Nav-A3).

Question 1: Maximum Deck Load and Hydrostatics of a Triangular Wall-Sided Barge

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given. A wall-sided (vertical-sided) barge whose waterplane, in plan, is a triangle: a point apex at the bow and the full 16 m beam at the stern, 80 m long. Because the sides are vertical, this triangular waterplane shape — and hence its area, LCF and moments of inertia — is the same at every draft up to the 6 m depth.

Given data
QuantitySymbolValue
Length$L$80 m
Maximum beam (at stern)$B_{max}$16 m
Depth$D$6 m
Minimum summer freeboard$fb$1.2 m
Light-ship draft$d_{light}$2.1 m
Light-ship $KG$$KG_{light}$3.10 m
Design draft (part a, b)$d$4.0 m
Check: water density is not stated for this question (Q4 on the same paper states 1.035 t/m³ for a different scenario); the standard summer-freeboard convention is saltwater at $\rho=1.025$ t/m³, used throughout this question.

Find. (i) the maximum deck load and the highest permissible $KG$ of that load; (ii) at $d=4$ m, the tons-per-metre immersion and the longitudinal centre of flotation.

F (LCF, 26.67 m fwd of stern) bow (apex) stern B=16 m L=80 m
Plan view of the waterplane: an isosceles triangle, apex at the bow, 16 m base at the stern — the same shape at every draft because the hull is wall-sided.

Approach. Get the (draft-independent) waterplane area and its transverse/longitudinal moments of inertia from the triangle formulas on the paper's own reference sheet; use Archimedes' principle at the freeboard-limited maximum draft and at the light-ship draft to get the maximum deck load, then use the metacentre at that maximum draft as the ship's absolute ceiling on overall $KG$ to back out the highest permissible $KG$ of the load itself.

  1. Waterplane area (constant for all drafts $\le D$). A triangle of base $B_{max}=16$ m and height $L=80$ m: $$A_W=\tfrac12 B_{max}L=\tfrac12(16)(80)=640\text{ m}^2$$
  2. Maximum permissible draft and displacements. Summer draft is depth less minimum freeboard: $$d_{max}=D-fb=6-1.2=4.8\text{ m}$$ $$\Delta_{light}=\rho A_W d_{light}=1.025(640)(2.1)=1377.6\text{ t},\qquad \Delta_{max}=\rho A_W d_{max}=1.025(640)(4.8)=3148.8\text{ t}$$ $$\boxed{W_{load}=\Delta_{max}-\Delta_{light}=3148.8-1377.6\approx1771.2\text{ t}}$$
  3. Transverse $BM$ and $KM$ at the maximum draft. Using the reference triangle with base $b=16$ m, apex offset $a=b/2=8$ m (isosceles), height $h=L=80$ m, the centroidal transverse moment of inertia (about the ship's centreline) is $\bar I_y=\tfrac{bh}{36}(a^2+b^2-ab)$: $$I_T=\frac{16(80)}{36}\!\left(8^2+16^2-8(16)\right)=6826.7\text{ m}^4$$ At $d_{max}=4.8$ m, $V_{max}=A_W d_{max}=3072\text{ m}^3$, and since the hull is wall-sided (rectangular cross-section at every station) $KB=d/2$: $$KB_{max}=2.4\text{ m},\quad BM_{T,max}=\frac{I_T}{V_{max}}=\frac{6826.7}{3072}\approx2.222\text{ m},\quad KM_{T,max}=KB_{max}+BM_{T,max}\approx4.622\text{ m}$$
  4. Highest permissible $KG$ of the load. The absolute ceiling on the loaded ship's $KG$ is $KM_{T,max}$ (the $GM=0$ limit); balance moments of weight about the keel between the light ship and the deck load: $$\Delta_{max}\,KM_{T,max}=\Delta_{light}\,KG_{light}+W_{load}\,KG_{load}$$ $$\boxed{KG_{load}=\frac{\Delta_{max}KM_{T,max}-\Delta_{light}KG_{light}}{W_{load}}=\frac{3148.8(4.622)-1377.6(3.10)}{1771.2}\approx5.81\text{ m above the keel}}$$
  5. Part (a): tons per metre immersion at $d=4$ m. Because $A_W$ is the same at every draft, $TPM$ is too — the classic wall-sided-hull property that TPM does not depend on draft: $$\boxed{TPM=\rho A_W=1.025(640)=656\text{ t/m}}$$
  6. Part (b): centre of flotation at $d=4$ m. The centroid of a triangle lies $h/3$ from its base; here the "base" (widest end) is the stern, so: $$\boxed{LCF=\frac{L}{3}=\frac{80}{3}\approx26.67\text{ m forward of the stern}\ (\approx53.33\text{ m aft of the bow})}$$
Question 1 — final results
QuantityValue
Waterplane area $A_W$ (all drafts)640 m$^2$
Maximum deck load$\approx1771.2$ t
Highest permissible $KG$ of that load$\approx5.81$ m above keel
TPM at $d=4$ m (and any draft)656 t/m
LCF at $d=4$ m (and any draft)$\approx26.67$ m fwd of stern

Question 2: Trim Angle from Shifting a Weight Toward the Bow

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given. The same triangular wall-sided barge, at the light-ship draft, floating at even keel. An 80 t weight already aboard, at amidships, is moved 25 m toward the bow.

Given data
QuantitySymbolValue
Light-ship draft$d_{light}$2.1 m
Light-ship $KG$$KG_{light}$3.10 m
Weight shifted$w$80 t
Shift distance$s$25 m, toward the bow

Find. The resulting trim angle.

WL0 (even keel) WL1 (trim by the head, θ≈0.497°) amidships w=80 t, shift 25 m FP AP bow → ← stern
Profile schematic (not to scale): shifting the weight toward the bow trims the barge by the head (bow deeper).

Approach. Get $MT1m$ from the longitudinal $BM$ and $KG$ at the light-ship draft, find the total change of trim from the shift's moment, then convert to an angle over the barge's length.

  1. Longitudinal moment of inertia (constant, as in Q1). Using $\bar I_x=\tfrac{bh^3}{36}$ with $b=B_{max}=16$ m, $h=L=80$ m (independent of the apex offset $a$): $$I_L=\frac{16(80)^3}{36}\approx227{,}556\text{ m}^4$$
  2. $BM_L$, $KM_L$, $GM_L$ at the light-ship draft. $V_{light}=A_W d_{light}=640(2.1)=1344\text{ m}^3$, $KB_{light}=d_{light}/2=1.05$ m: $$BM_{L,light}=\frac{227{,}556}{1344}\approx169.31\text{ m},\qquad GM_{L,light}=KB_{light}+BM_{L,light}-KG_{light}\approx1.05+169.31-3.10\approx167.26\text{ m}$$
  3. Moment to trim 1 m and change of trim. $$MT1m=\frac{\Delta_{light}\,GM_{L,light}}{L}=\frac{1377.6(167.26)}{80}\approx2880.3\text{ t}\cdot\text{m/m}$$ $$\text{Trimming moment}=w\,s=80(25)=2000\text{ t}\cdot\text{m}\ \Rightarrow\ COT=\frac{2000}{2880.3}\approx0.694\text{ m}$$
  4. Trim angle. $$\boxed{\theta=\arctan\!\left(\frac{COT}{L}\right)=\arctan\!\left(\frac{0.694}{80}\right)\approx0.497^\circ\text{ (by the head)}}$$
Question 2 — final results
QuantityValue
$GM_L$ (light-ship)$\approx167.26$ m
$MT1m$ (light-ship)$\approx2880$ t·m/m
Change of trim$\approx0.694$ m
Trim angle$\approx0.497^\circ$, by the head

Question 3: KG from an Inclining Experiment (Least-Squares Fit)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given. Five (moment, list-angle) pairs from moving a known weight across the deck, plus the ship's $KM$ and its displacement as tested (with the 35 LT inclining gear aboard, at 39 ft above the keel).

Given data
QuantitySymbolValue
Displacement (with gear aboard)$\Delta$3900 LT
Transverse metacentric height$KM$24.5 ft
Inclining gear weight$w_g$35 LT
Inclining gear $KG$$kg_g$39 ft
Readings$(M,\theta)$see table above (5 pairs)

Find. $GM$ from the plotted data, then the ship's $KG$ corrected for removal of the inclining gear after the test.

Inclining moment (ft·LT), starboard + List angle (deg, corrected), starboard + best-fit line
Inclining-moment vs. list-angle readings (blue points, corrected for the pre-existing list) and the least-squares best-fit line through the origin (red).

Approach. Correct every reading for the small permanent list observed at zero applied moment, fit a straight line of $\tan\theta$ against moment through the corrected origin, take $GM$ from its slope, recover $KG$ from $KM-GM$, then strip out the temporary inclining gear's contribution to get the ship's true $KG$.

  1. Correct for the initial list. At zero applied moment the ship already lists $0.2^\circ$ to port; subtract this offset (add $0.2^\circ$, taking starboard positive) from every reading: $$\begin{aligned} (910,\,2.7)&\to(910,\,2.9^\circ)\qquad(575,\,1.4)\to(575,\,1.6^\circ)\qquad(0,\,-0.2)\to(0,\,0^\circ)\\ (-541,\,-1.8)&\to(-541,\,-1.6^\circ)\qquad(-882,\,-2.5)&\to(-882,\,-2.3^\circ) \end{aligned}$$
  2. Least-squares slope through the origin. For small angles $\tan\theta=M/(\Delta\,GM)$, so plotting $\tan\theta$ against $M$ gives a line of slope $1/(\Delta\,GM)$ through the origin: $$\text{slope}=\frac{\sum M_i\tan\theta_i}{\sum M_i^2}\approx5.055\times10^{-5}\ \text{ft}^{-1}\cdot\text{LT}^{-1}$$
  3. Experimental $GM$ and $KG$ as inclined. $$GM=\frac{1}{\Delta\cdot\text{slope}}=\frac{1}{3900(5.055\times10^{-5})}\approx5.07\text{ ft},\qquad KG_{inclined}=KM-GM=24.5-5.07\approx19.43\text{ ft}$$
  4. Correct for removal of the inclining gear. The 35 LT of temporary gear (part of the 3900 LT tested) is removed after the test; take moments about the keel to strip it out: $$KG_{ship}=\frac{\Delta\,KG_{inclined}-w_g\,kg_g}{\Delta-w_g}=\frac{3900(19.43)-35(39)}{3865}\approx19.25\text{ ft}$$ $$\boxed{GM\approx5.07\text{ ft},\qquad KG_{ship}\approx19.25\text{ ft (gear removed)}}$$
Question 3 — final results
QuantityValue
Best-fit slope, $\tan\theta/M$$\approx5.06\times10^{-5}\text{ ft}^{-1}\text{LT}^{-1}$
Experimental $GM$$\approx5.07$ ft
$KG$ as inclined (gear aboard)$\approx19.43$ ft
$KG$ of ship (gear removed)$\approx19.25$ ft

Question 4: Trim of the Triangular Barge After Flooding a Stern-End Compartment

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given. The same triangular barge as Q1, at draft 4 m, with an empty, full-width, 5 m compartment at the extreme stern opened to the sea. Because the flooded compartment stays open to the sea, displacement and $KG$ are unchanged — this is a lost-buoyancy problem — but because the hull tapers, the flooded strip is a trapezoid (beam 16 m at the transom, 15 m at 5 m forward of it), not a rectangle.

Given data
QuantitySymbolValue
Draft before flooding$d_0$4.0 m
$KG$$KG$2.5 m
Flooded compartment length (stern-end)$l_c$5.0 m
Permeability$\mu$85% (0.85)
Water density$\rho$1.035 t/m$^3$

Find. The new forward and aft drafts after flooding, by the lost-buoyancy method.

flooded (μ=0.85) WL0 (d=4.0 m) WL1 (final, trim by the stern: F=2.50 m, A=5.60 m) F1 (new LCF) FP AP bow → ← stern (compartment)
Profile schematic (not to scale): the stern-end compartment ($l_c=5$ m, $\mu=0.85$) is open to the sea, shifting the intact centre of flotation $F_1$ forward and trimming the barge by the stern.

Approach. Displacement and $KG$ stay fixed. Using bow-referenced station $\xi$ ($0$–$80$ m, beam $B(\xi)=0.2\xi$), find the flooded strip's area and centroid by integration, subtract $\mu$ times the strip from the full triangle to get the intact waterplane, find the new parallel draft, the new $LCF_1$, and the intact $I_L$ about $F_1$, then trim about $F_1$ until the (unmoved) $G$ realigns under the shifted centre of buoyancy.

  1. Displacement (constant). $V_0=A_W d_0=640(4)=2560\text{ m}^3$, $\Delta=\rho V_0=1.035(2560)\approx2649.6\text{ t}$.
  2. Flooded strip (stern-end, $\xi=75$ to $80$). $B(\xi)=0.2\xi$, so: $$a_{strip}=\int_{75}^{80}0.2\xi\,d\xi=0.1(80^2-75^2)=77.5\text{ m}^2,\qquad \bar\xi_{strip}=\frac{\int_{75}^{80}0.2\xi^2\,d\xi}{a_{strip}}=\frac{0.2(80^3-75^3)/3}{77.5}\approx77.53\text{ m from the bow}$$
  3. Intact waterplane area and new parallel draft. Effective area lost is $\mu\,a_{strip}=0.85(77.5)=65.9\text{ m}^2$: $$A_1=A_W-\mu\,a_{strip}=640-65.9\approx574.1\text{ m}^2,\qquad d_1=\frac{V_0}{A_1}=\frac{2560}{574.1}\approx4.459\text{ m}$$
  4. New centre of flotation $F_1$. The full triangle's own centroid is $\xi_{F0}=\tfrac{2}{3}L\approx53.33$ m from the bow; removing $\mu\,a_{strip}$ at $\bar\xi_{strip}$: $$\xi_{F_1}=\frac{A_W\,\xi_{F0}-\mu\,a_{strip}\,\bar\xi_{strip}}{A_1}=\frac{640(53.33)-0.85(77.5)(77.53)}{574.1}\approx50.56\text{ m from the bow}\ (\approx29.44\text{ m fwd of the stern})$$
  5. Longitudinal inertia of the intact waterplane about $F_1$, and $MT1m$. Working all second moments about the bow ($I=\int\xi^2 B(\xi)\,d\xi$) then shifting once to $F_1$: $$I_{full,bow}=I_L+A_W\,\xi_{F0}^2\approx2{,}048{,}000\text{ m}^4,\quad I_{strip,bow}=\int_{75}^{80}0.2\xi^3\,d\xi\approx465{,}969\text{ m}^4$$ $$I_{L,1,about\ bow}=I_{full,bow}-\mu\,I_{strip,bow}\approx1{,}651{,}927\text{ m}^4,\qquad I_{L,1,about\ F_1}=I_{L,1,about\ bow}-A_1\,\xi_{F_1}^2\approx184{,}436\text{ m}^4$$ With $KB_1=d_1/2\approx2.229$ m and $BM_{L,1}=I_{L,1,about\ F_1}/V_0\approx72.05$ m: $$GM_{L,1}=KB_1+BM_{L,1}-KG\approx2.229+72.05-2.5\approx71.77\text{ m},\qquad MT1m=\frac{\Delta\,GM_{L,1}}{L}\approx\frac{2649.6(71.77)}{80}\approx2377\text{ t}\cdot\text{m/m}$$
  6. Change of trim and new drafts. $G$ is unmoved at $\xi_{F0}=53.33$ m, aft of the new $F_1$ (50.56 m); the resulting moment trims the barge by the stern: $$\text{Trimming moment}=\Delta\,|\xi_{F0}-\xi_{F_1}|=2649.6(2.78)\approx7355\text{ t}\cdot\text{m}\ \Rightarrow\ COT=\frac{7355}{2377}\approx3.094\text{ m}$$ Apportioning about $F_1$ ($l_F\approx50.56$ m to the bow, $l_A\approx29.44$ m to the stern): $$\boxed{d_F=d_1-COT\cdot\frac{l_F}{L}\approx4.459-1.955\approx2.50\text{ m},\qquad d_A=d_1+COT\cdot\frac{l_A}{L}\approx4.459+1.139\approx5.60\text{ m}}$$
Question 4 — final results
QuantityValue
MethodLost buoyancy (compartment open to the sea)
New parallel draft $d_1$$\approx4.459$ m
New centre of flotation $F_1$$\approx29.44$ m fwd of stern
New moment to trim 1 m$\approx2377$ t·m/m
New forward draft$\approx2.50$ m
New aft draft$\approx5.60$ m

Question 5: Correcting the GZ Curve for the Actual Loading Condition

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Check: the given curve reads $GZ(0^\circ)=-0.055$ m, not the $0$ required by definition (a symmetric hull has zero righting arm at zero heel) — the same kind of small scatter as the pre-existing list in Q3. It is transcribed exactly as printed and carried through the correction formula, but $GM$ is read from the curve's near-origin slope ($GZ(15^\circ)/\sin15^\circ$) rather than from this anomalous point.

Given. A static-stability ($GZ$) curve computed for an assumed $KG=6.5\text{ m}$, and the ship's actual weight distribution before sailing, from which the true $KG$ differs from the assumed value.

Given data
QuantitySymbolValue
Assumed $KG$ (curve as given)$KG_{assumed}$6.5 m
Total displacement$\Delta$$4200+9100+1500+200=15{,}000$ t
$GZ(\theta)$, assumed curve—tabulated above, $\theta=0$–$90^\circ$

Find. The corrected $GZ$ curve, $GM$ read from it, the angle of vanishing stability, the angle of maximum stability, and the maximum righting moment.

Heel angle (deg) GZ (m) assumed (KG=6.5 m) corrected (KG=6.14 m) tangent at origin -> GM ≈ 0.79 m
Static stability curves: assumed $KG=6.5\text{ m}$ (grey, dashed) and corrected for the actual loading, $KG\approx6.14\text{ m}$ (blue, solid). The dashed red line is the theoretical tangent at the origin, whose slope gives $GM$.

Approach. Find the actual $KG$ by taking moments of the loading condition about the keel, apply the standard small-angle $KG$-correction to every point of the given $GZ$ curve, then read $GM$, the vanishing-stability angle, and the maximum-$GZ$ angle off the corrected curve.

  1. Actual $KG$ for the loading condition. $$KG_{actual}=\frac{4200(6.0)+9100(7.0)+1500(1.1)+200(7.5)}{15{,}000}=\frac{92{,}050}{15{,}000}\approx6.137\text{ m}$$
  2. Correct the GZ curve for the KG difference. $KG_{actual}
  3. $GM$ from the corrected curve. Since the origin must theoretically be $(0^\circ,0)$, take the slope from the first genuine reading: $$GM\approx\frac{GZ(15^\circ)}{\sin15^\circ}=\frac{0.204}{0.2588}\approx0.788\text{ m}$$
  4. Angle of vanishing stability. $GZ_{actual}$ is still positive at $75^\circ$ ($0.301\text{ m}$) but negative at $90^\circ$ ($-0.267\text{ m}$); interpolating linearly for the zero crossing: $$\theta_{vanish}=75+15\left(\frac{0.301}{0.301+0.267}\right)\approx83.0^\circ$$
  5. Angle of maximum stability and maximum righting moment. The corrected curve peaks at the tabulated $45^\circ$ point ($GZ_{max}\approx0.837\text{ m}$): $$\boxed{GM\approx0.79\text{ m},\quad \theta_{vanish}\approx83.0^\circ,\quad \theta_{max}\approx45^\circ,\quad M_{max}=\Delta\cdot GZ_{max}\approx15{,}000(0.837)\approx12{,}554\text{ t}\cdot\text{m}}$$
Question 5 — final results
QuantityValue
Actual $KG$$\approx6.137$ m
$GM$ (from corrected curve)$\approx0.79$ m
Angle of vanishing stability$\approx83.0^\circ$
Angle of maximum stability$\approx45^\circ$
Maximum $GZ$$\approx0.837$ m
Maximum righting moment$\approx12{,}554$ t·m

Generated 2026-09-01 19:50 UTC — Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)