22-Agric-A2 Soil Physics and Mechanics · December 2015
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Paper format. 04-Agric-A2 Soil Physics & Mechanics, National Exams December 2015 — a three-hour open-book examination; any non-communicating calculator is permitted. The cover page states that five (5) questions constitute a complete exam paper and that only the first five as they appear in the answer book are marked, that each question is of equal value, and that some questions require a written answer whose clarity and organization matter for marks. All seven printed questions are worked here, because the set is a study resource rather than a timed attempt; on exam day a candidate submits only the first five, in order.
Reference texts. B.M. Das, Principles of Geotechnical Engineering, 9th ed. (weight-volume relationships, permeability, seepage, effective stress, compaction, shear strength); R.F. Craig, Craig's Soil Mechanics, 9th ed. (effective stress, seepage and flow nets, shear strength); G.O. Schwab et al., Soil and Water Conservation Engineering, 5th ed. (infiltration, erosion estimation, drainage).
Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.
Given.
| Quantity | Value |
|---|---|
| Sand layer thickness | 5 m (contains points A, B, C) |
| Clay layer thickness | 10 m (below the sand) |
| γdry, γsat — sand | 19, 22 kN/m³ |
| γdry, γsat — clay | 18, 21 kN/m³ |
| Initial water-table depth | 1 m below ground surface |
| Point locations | A = ground surface; C = sand/clay interface (5 m depth); B = midway, 2.5 m |
Find. Total stress σ, pore pressure u, and effective stress σ′ at A, B, C before dewatering and after the water table is drawn down to C (immediately, and long afterward); sketch σ′ at B vs. time.
Approach. All three points sit inside the sand layer, so a single dry/ saturated unit-weight pair applies throughout; compute σ, u and σ′ = σ − u at each point for the initial water table, then repeat for the water table relocated to C. Because sand is highly permeable, treat the "immediately after" and "long after" states as identical for these three points — there is no clay-style consolidation lag while the water table itself sits inside the free-draining sand.
c) Why a step, not a consolidation curve. In a low-permeability clay, lowering the water table (or applying a load) generates an excess pore pressure that dissipates only slowly, as water is squeezed out through a long drainage path — that produces the familiar gradual, asymptotic rise in σ′ over months or years. Sand's permeability is many orders of magnitude higher, so any excess pore pressure it develops drains away essentially instantaneously on an engineering timescale; there is no meaningful "immediately after" distinct from "long after" for point B. The sketch is therefore a flat line at 37.3 kPa, a near-vertical rise the moment the water table is drawn down, then a flat line at 47.5 kPa — the opposite behaviour from the slow, load-driven excess-pore-pressure dissipation seen when a surcharge is placed on a saturated clay.
| Location / state | σ (kPa) | u (kPa) | σ′ (kPa) |
|---|---|---|---|
| A, before and after | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| B, before dewatering | 52.0 | 14.72 | 37.29 |
| B, after dewatering (immediate = long-term) | 47.5 | 0 | 47.5 |
| C, before dewatering | 107.0 | 39.24 | 67.76 |
| C, after dewatering (immediate = long-term) | 95.0 | 0 | 95.0 |