Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
National Exams December 2014 — 04-Agric-A3, Heat Engineering (3 hours, open book). Four questions constitute a complete exam paper; each is of equal value (25 points) and all require calculation.
Reference texts: Çengel & Ghajar, Heat and Mass Transfer: Fundamentals and Applications (conduction, composite walls); J.P. Holman, Heat Transfer (natural-convection correlations, boundary-layer thickness); R.F. Barron, Cryogenic Heat Transfer (concentric-cylinder radiation shields).
Problem 1: Conduction Through a Lead Slab (25 points)
Find. The heat flux q and the heat transfer rate Q through the slab.
Approach. Both face temperatures are already known, so steady one-dimensional conduction (Fourier's law) gives the flux directly with no need to solve for an unknown temperature first; the rate follows by multiplying the flux by the slab's face area.
Steady 1-D conduction across the lead slab: both face temperatures are known, so the flux and rate follow directly from Fourier's law.
Heat flux from Fourier's law. For steady 1-D conduction with no internal generation, $q = k\,\dfrac{T_1-T_2}{L}$, so
$$q = 35\ \frac{\text{W}}{\text{m}\cdot\text{K}} \times \frac{110-50}{0.03\ \text{m}} = 35\times\frac{60}{0.03} = \boxed{70{,}000\ \text{W/m}^2 = 70\ \text{kW/m}^2}$$
Heat transfer rate. The rate is the flux times the face area,
$$Q = q\,A = 70{,}000\ \text{W/m}^2 \times 0.4\ \text{m}^2 = \boxed{28{,}000\ \text{W} = 28\ \text{kW}}$$
Lead's high conductivity (35 W/m·K, typical of a soft metal) combined with a thin 3 cm section is why even a modest 60°C drop drives a large 70 kW/m² flux — two orders of magnitude higher than the flux through the insulating layers in Problem 2.