NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

22-Agric-A4 Fluid Flow · December 2016

Question 1 of 4: Four-Pipe Junction Network

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

National Exams — December 2016 — 04-Agric-A4, Fluid Flow. Three-hour, open-book exam; any non-communicating calculator is permitted. Format: four questions constitute a complete paper (the first four questions appearing in the answer book are marked), each of equal value; all questions require calculation.

Reference texts: White, Fluid Mechanics (7th/8th ed., McGraw-Hill) — pipe-friction networks (Darcy–Weisbach, Colebrook), cavitation number, rotating control volumes (sprinkler reaction), and pump/system energy balances.

Problem 1: Four-Pipe Junction Network (equal value)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given. Four identical horizontal cast-iron pipes (length $L=45\ \text{m}$, diameter $D=8\ \text{cm}$, relative roughness $\epsilon/D=0.00325$) radiate from reservoirs 1–4 and meet at a common junction a. Minor losses are neglected.

QuantityValue
Pipe length, $L$ (each)45 m
Pipe diameter, $D$ (each)8 cm
Relative roughness, $\epsilon/D$0.00325
$p_1,\,p_2,\,p_3,\,p_4$950, 350, 675, 100 kPa
Water, 20°C$\rho=998\ \text{kg/m}^3$, $\mu=0.001\ \text{kg/m}\cdot\text{s}$

Find. The flow rate $Q$ in each of the four pipes, including its direction relative to the junction.

a 1 2 3 4 p₁ = 950 kPa p₂ = 350 kPa p₃ = 675 kPa p₄ = 100 kPa L₁ L₂ L₃ L₄ arrows show the converged flow direction (into/out of junction a)
Figure 1 — Four identical 45 m × 8 cm cast-iron pipes meet at junction a; the known reservoir pressures $p_1$–$p_4$ drive flow into a from the two higher-pressure ends and out toward the two lower-pressure ends.

Approach. Assume a trial junction pressure $p_a$; each branch is then a single Darcy–Weisbach pipe with a known pressure drop, so its velocity follows from an iterated Colebrook friction factor. Adjust $p_a$ until the four branch flows satisfy continuity at the junction (flow in = flow out), following the source's own guess-and-check hint.

  1. Governing equations (identical form for every branch). For a branch with pressure drop $|\Delta p_i| = |p_i-p_a|$, $$\begin{aligned} |\Delta p_i| &= f_i\frac{L}{D}\frac{\rho V_i^2}{2} \\ \frac{1}{\sqrt{f_i}} &= -2\log_{10}\!\left(\frac{\epsilon/D}{3.7}+\frac{2.51}{Re_i\sqrt{f_i}}\right) \\ Re_i &=\frac{\rho V_i D}{\mu} \end{aligned}$$ with flow directed from the higher pressure toward the lower (into the junction if $p_i>p_a$, out if $p_i<p_a$).
  2. Iterate on $p_a$ for junction continuity. Starting from the source's hint ($p_a\approx530$ kPa, $f_1\approx0.027$) and refining by bisection on $\sum Q_{\text{in}}-\sum Q_{\text{out}}=0$ converges to $$\boxed{p_a \approx 517.3\ \text{kPa}},$$ close to the hinted starting value, with $f_1=0.0270$ matching the hinted friction factor almost exactly.
  3. Branch velocities and flow rates at the converged $p_a$. Applying Step 1 to each branch (Reynolds numbers all in the $3.6\times10^5$–$6.0\times10^5$ range, fully turbulent, $f\approx0.027$ for all four pipes since the roughness dominates): $$\begin{aligned} Q_1 &= V_1A = \boxed{136.8\ \text{m}^3/\text{h}}\ \text{(into a)} \\ Q_2 &= V_2A = \boxed{84.8\ \text{m}^3/\text{h}}\ \text{(out of a)} \\ Q_3 &= V_3A = \boxed{82.4\ \text{m}^3/\text{h}}\ \text{(into a)} \\ Q_4 &= V_4A = \boxed{134.3\ \text{m}^3/\text{h}}\ \text{(out of a)} \end{aligned}$$
  4. Continuity check. Flow into the junction $Q_1+Q_3 = 136.8+82.4 = 219.2\ \text{m}^3/\text{h}$ equals flow out $Q_2+Q_4 = 84.8+134.3 = 219.2\ \text{m}^3/\text{h}$, confirming the converged $p_a$.
PipeΔp (kPa)V (m/s)fQ (m³/h)Direction
1 ($p_1=950$)432.77.560.0270136.8into a
2 ($p_2=350$)167.34.690.027184.8out of a
3 ($p_3=675$)157.74.550.027182.4into a
4 ($p_4=100$)417.37.420.0270134.3out of a
Junction pressure$p_a\approx517.3$ kPa
← Paper overview