22-Agric-A5 Principles of Instrumentation · May 2018
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Paper format. 04-Agric-A5 Principles of Instrumentation, National Exams May 2018 — a three-hour open-book exam; any non-communicating calculator is permitted. Questions 1 and 2 are compulsory (20 marks each); candidates then choose any three (3) of Questions 3-7 (20 marks each) for a 100-mark paper. All seven questions are worked here.
Reference texts. E.O. Doebelin, Measurement Systems: Application and Design, 5th ed. (calibration, standards, static/dynamic sensor characteristics, second-order step response, sampling and ADCs); J.P. Bentley, Principles of Measurement Systems, 4th ed. (accuracy vs. precision, error propagation, signal conditioning); P. Horowitz and W. Hill, The Art of Electronics, 3rd ed. (Johnson noise, CMRR, ADC architectures, anti-aliasing, op-amp signal conditioning); J. Fraden, Handbook of Modern Sensors: Physics, Designs, and Applications, 5th ed. (thermistors, thermocouples, capacitive and photo sensors).
Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.
a) Under an axial compressive load the cylinder shortens along its own axis (negative axial strain), so the axial gage (G1, bonded parallel to the cylinder's long axis) physically shortens with it and its resistance decreases ($\Delta R/R=GF\cdot\varepsilon_{axial}<0$). At the same time, because the material is (very nearly) incompressible on a Poisson's-ratio basis, the shortened cylinder must bulge outward radially/circumferentially to conserve volume — the transverse gage (G2, bonded around the circumference) is stretched by that bulging and its resistance increases. The two strains are linked by Poisson's ratio, $\varepsilon_{transverse}=-\nu\,\varepsilon_{axial}$, so the transverse strain is always opposite in sign to (and smaller in magnitude than) the axial strain.
b) Sensitivity can be raised by reducing the cylinder's cross-sectional area (thinner wall or smaller diameter, staying within the elastic range) so the same applied weight produces a larger axial stress $\sigma=F/A$ and hence larger strain $\varepsilon=\sigma/E$; by choosing a lower-modulus material ($E$ smaller gives more strain per unit stress, again within its elastic limit); by using gages with a higher gage factor $GF$ (more $\Delta R/R$ per unit strain); by wiring all four active/compensating positions with gages (a full 4-active-arm bridge) instead of the 2 shown, which roughly doubles the bridge output for the same strain; and/or by increasing the excitation voltage $V_{exc}$ (bounded by the self-heating limit of Q3e).
c) Put G1 in place of R1 and G2 in place of R3 — i.e. the two active gages occupy the two arms of the same series branch (Out 1's divider), while R2 and R4 remain ordinary fixed, matched resistors. Both gages sit right next to each other on the same load cell, so any change in ambient/self-heating temperature changes both of their resistances by the same amount, $\Delta R_{T}$. Writing $R1=R_0+\Delta R_{1,strain}+\Delta R_T$ and $R3=R_0+\Delta R_{2,strain}+\Delta R_T$, the divider output $Out_1=V_{exc}\,R3/(R1+R3)$ depends (for small changes) on the difference $\Delta R_{2,strain}-\Delta R_{1,strain}$ — the common $\Delta R_T$ term cancels out of that difference entirely. Because the axial and transverse strains are opposite in sign (part a), $\Delta R_{2,strain}-\Delta R_{1,strain}$ does not cancel — the strain signal survives while the temperature signal is rejected.
d) A differential (instrumentation) amplifier should be used to take Out 1 and Out 2 as its two inputs, since both outputs ride on a large common signal (nominally $V_{exc}/2$) with only a small difference between them carrying the actual weight information. The critical performance characteristic is a high common mode rejection ratio (CMRR, Q2h) — the amplifier must reject the large shared $V_{exc}/2$ component (and any common-mode interference/ground offset riding on it) while faithfully amplifying only the small Out 1−Out 2 difference signal; it should also present a high input impedance so it does not load (and unbalance) the bridge itself.
e) Given. Excitation $V_{exc}$, fixed reference resistor $R_{ref}$, single active gage G1 with nominal (zero-strain) resistance equal to $R_{ref}$ and a load-induced change $\delta$ (so $G1=R_{ref}+\delta$), two matched fixed resistors $R$ forming a divider between $V_{exc}$ and the op-amp's own output, ideal op-amp with its non-inverting ($+$) input grounded.
Find. $V_{out}$ as a function of $\delta$ and the circuit values.
Approach. Recognize the left-hand loop as a standard inverting op-amp stage (input resistor $R_{ref}$ from $V_{exc}$, feedback element G1, feeding back from the op-amp's output to its inverting input) to get the op-amp's own output as a function of G1, then apply voltage-divider analysis to the right-hand $R$-$R$ pair.
$V_{out}$ is exactly proportional to $\delta$ — at $\delta=0$ (no load) the circuit is balanced and $V_{out}=0$, exactly as a bridge output should be, and the same constant-current linearization trick used for the RTD/bridge amplifier removes any non-linearity from the single-gage measurement.
The zero-load balance condition $V_{out}(\delta=0)=0$ requires G1's nominal (unloaded) resistance to equal $R_{ref}$ — not stated numerically in the question, but implied by the circuit's own design intent (a genuine bridge output must read zero at zero strain); this is assumed here and confirmed algebraically above.
| Item | Result |
|---|---|
| Bridge arrangement for temperature compensation | G1 → R1, G2 → R3 (same branch); R2, R4 fixed |
| Amplifier requirement for Out1/Out2 | Differential/instrumentation amp, high CMRR |
| Single-gage op-amp output | $V_{out}=-\dfrac{V_{exc}\,\delta}{2R_{ref}}$ (linear in $\delta$) |