22-Agric-B11 Principles of Waste Management · May 2015
Question 2 of 5: Anaerobic Digestion of Swine Manure
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
National Exams — 04-Agric-B11, Principles of Waste Management — May 2015. 3-hour duration, open-book exam. Answer Question 1 plus any three of Questions 2 to 5; all five questions are answered below as a complete study resource.
Reference texts: Tchobanoglous, Burton & Stensel, Metcalf & Eddy Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Resource Recovery; MWPS-18, Livestock Waste Facilities Handbook (MidWest Plan Service); Rynk et al., On-Farm Composting Handbook (NRAES-54); Sommer & Christensen (eds.), Animal Manure Recycling: Treatment and Management.
Question 2: Anaerobic Digestion of Swine Manure (25 marks)
Given. The design data supplied by the question are collected below; every additional figure needed to size a real digester (hydraulic retention time, volatile-solids destruction, biogas yield, methane fraction, influent temperature, insulation performance, and CHP waste-heat recovery) is not stated in the exam and is fixed here as a stated engineering assumption, each flagged in the callout below.
Quantity
Value
Herd size
10,000 farrow-to-finish pigs
Dry-solid production
1.0 kg TS/pig/day
Slurry solids content
5% (wt)
Digester operating temperature
35 °C (mesophilic)
Check: not supplied by the exam and fixed here as stated design assumptions — hydraulic retention time (HRT) = 20 days (typical mesophilic complete-mix range 15–20 d, MWPS-18); slurry density = 1,000 kg/m³; two identical digesters, working depth 6 m; volatile solids = 80% of total solids (typical swine-manure VS/TS, MWPS-18); VS destruction = 45% (typical mesophilic value); biogas yield = 0.75 m³/kg VS destroyed; biogas methane content = 60%; influent slurry temperature = 10 °C; overall tank heat-transfer coefficient U = 0.5 W/m²·K (insulated tank); winter ambient design temperature = −10 °C; combined jacket-water + exhaust waste-heat recovery fraction of the engine-generator = 40% of the biogas fuel energy.
Find. Digester volume and dimensions; daily biogas production; digester heating requirement; whether recovered engine waste heat covers that requirement.
Two mesophilic complete-mix digesters in parallel, waste heat from the engine-generator recycled through a heat exchanger back into the digester heating loop.
Approach. Convert the given dry-solids loading and slurry solids content into a slurry flow rate, size the digester volume from an assumed hydraulic retention time, estimate biogas production from an assumed volatile-solids destruction and yield, compute the sensible-heating and tank-conduction heat loads to hold 35 °C, and finally compare recoverable engine waste heat against that heating requirement.
Slurry flow rate. Dry solids: $\dot{m}_{TS} = 10{,}000 \text{ pigs} \times 1.0\ \text{kg/pig}\cdot\text{d} = 10{,}000\ \text{kg TS/d}$. At 5% solids content, the wet slurry mass flow is $\dot{m}_{wet} = \dot{m}_{TS}/0.05 = 200{,}000\ \text{kg/d}$, and at an assumed slurry density of 1,000 kg/m³, $$Q = \frac{200{,}000\ \text{kg/d}}{1{,}000\ \text{kg/m}^3} = \boxed{200\ \text{m}^3/\text{d}}$$
Digester volume and dimensions. With an assumed HRT of 20 days for mesophilic complete-mix digestion, $$V = Q \times \text{HRT} = 200\ \text{m}^3/\text{d} \times 20\ \text{d} = 4{,}000\ \text{m}^3$$ Splitting this into two identical digesters for operational redundancy gives $V_{each}=2{,}000\ \text{m}^3$. At an assumed working depth of 6 m, each digester's plan area is $A = V_{each}/h = 2{,}000/6 = 333.3\ \text{m}^2$, giving a circular tank diameter $$D = \sqrt{\frac{4A}{\pi}} = \sqrt{\frac{4(333.3)}{\pi}} = \boxed{20.6\ \text{m}}$$ so the design is two cylindrical digesters, each 20.6 m diameter × 6 m working depth (2,000 m³).
Daily biogas production. Assuming volatile solids are 80% of total solids for swine manure, $VS = 10{,}000 \times 0.80 = 8{,}000\ \text{kg VS/d}$. At an assumed 45% VS destruction in the mesophilic digester, $VS_{destroyed} = 8{,}000 \times 0.45 = 3{,}600\ \text{kg/d}$. With an assumed biogas yield of 0.75 m³/kg VS destroyed, $$V_{biogas} = 3{,}600 \times 0.75 = \boxed{2{,}700\ \text{m}^3/\text{d}}$$ At an assumed 60% methane content and a methane lower heating value of 35.8 MJ/m³, the biogas energy content is $2{,}700 \times (0.60 \times 35.8) = 58{,}000\ \text{MJ/d} \approx 671\ \text{kW}$ of continuous fuel-energy input to the engine-generator.
Digester heating requirement — sensible heat. Incoming slurry must be warmed from an assumed 10 °C influent temperature to the 35 °C digester temperature, a rise of 25 K. With slurry ≈ 95% moisture, its specific heat is taken close to water's, $c_p \approx 4.0\ \text{kJ/kg}\cdot\text{K}$: $$\dot{Q}_{sens} = \dot{m}_{wet}\, c_p\, \Delta T = 200{,}000 \times 4.0 \times 25 = 2.00\times10^{7}\ \text{kJ/d} = \boxed{231.5\ \text{kW}}$$
Digester heating requirement — tank conduction loss. Each tank's wall area is $\pi D h = \pi(20.6)(6)=388.3\ \text{m}^2$ and its two end caps (roof + floor) total $2 \times \tfrac{\pi}{4}D^2 = 666.7\ \text{m}^2$, giving $1{,}055.0\ \text{m}^2$ per tank and $2{,}110.0\ \text{m}^2$ for both. At an assumed insulated-tank $U = 0.5\ \text{W/m}^2\cdot\text{K}$ against a winter design ambient of −10 °C ($\Delta T = 45$ K), $$\dot{Q}_{loss} = U A \Delta T = 0.5 \times 2{,}110.0 \times 45 = \boxed{47.5\ \text{kW}}$$ giving a total digester heating requirement of $$\dot{Q}_{heat} = \dot{Q}_{sens}+\dot{Q}_{loss} = 231.5+47.5 = \boxed{279.0\ \text{kW}}$$
Waste-heat sufficiency check. With the biogas fuel-energy input of 671 kW (Step 3) and an assumed 40% of that recoverable as usable jacket-water/exhaust waste heat from the engine-generator, $$\dot{Q}_{waste} = 0.40 \times 671 = \boxed{268.5\ \text{kW}}$$ Comparing to the 279.0 kW requirement, the recovered waste heat covers $268.5/279.0 = 96\%$ of the digester heating load — marginally insufficient under the assumed winter design conditions. The shortfall is small (≈10.5 kW) and could realistically be closed by tightening tank insulation (lowering $U$) or by a modest auxiliary biogas-fired boiler sized for the winter deficit; it should not be read as a fundamental process failure.