NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

22-Agric-B11 Principles of Waste Management · Undated paper

Question 4 of 5: Manure Storage, Pump Sizing and Land-Application Nitrogen Budget

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

National Exams — 04-Agric-B11, Principles of Waste Management. 3-hour duration, open-book exam (this paper is catalogued as "undated" in this collection). Answer Question 1 plus any three of Questions 2 to 5; all five questions are answered below as a complete study resource.

Reference texts: Tchobanoglous, Burton & Stensel, Metcalf & Eddy Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Resource Recovery; MWPS-18, Livestock Waste Facilities Handbook (MidWest Plan Service); Rynk et al., On-Farm Composting Handbook (NRAES-54); Sommer & Christensen (eds.), Animal Manure Recycling: Treatment and Management.

Question 4: Manure Storage, Pump Sizing and Land-Application Nitrogen Budget (25 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

1) Number and dimensions of the storage tanks (5 marks).

Given. Annual liquid manure production 10,000 m³/yr (4 wt% solids, not otherwise needed for tank sizing); maximum diameter 15 m (geological constraint); maximum storage duration one year (no precipitation addition given, so the tanks are sized on the manure volume alone).

Check: working (liquid) depth is not stated by the exam; a typical circular concrete manure-storage working depth of 6 m is assumed (MWPS-18 practical range roughly 3.7–6 m for tanks of this diameter).

Find. The number of tanks and their dimensions.

  1. Single-tank capacity at the diameter cap. At $D_{max}=15\ \text{m}$ and an assumed 6 m working depth, $$V_{tank,max} = \frac{\pi}{4}(15)^2(6) = \boxed{1{,}060\ \text{m}^3}$$ — far short of the 10,000 m³ annual volume, so more than one tank is required.
  2. Number of tanks. $$n = \frac{10{,}000}{1{,}060} = 9.43 \;\Rightarrow\; \boxed{n = 10\ \text{tanks}}\ \text{(rounded up to fully contain the required volume)}$$
  3. Exact depth for 10 tanks at the diameter cap. Holding $D=15\ \text{m}$ and solving for the depth that exactly delivers 10,000 m³ across 10 tanks, $$h = \frac{10{,}000}{10\times(\pi/4)(15)^2} = \boxed{5.66\ \text{m}}$$
QuantityResult
Number of storage tanks10
Tank dimensionsD = 15.0 m × h = 5.66 m (each)
Total storage volume provided10,000 m³

2) Total dynamic head of the pump (10 marks).

Given. Pipe length 200 m, nominal 8-inch PVC (taken as ID = 8 in = 0.2032 m); tank-surface elevation 320.00 m; barn collection-pit elevation 330.00 m; manure friction coefficient f = 0.07 (Darcy form, elevated above a clear-water value because manure slurry is a non-Newtonian fluid with higher apparent viscosity than water — used directly as given, no Colebrook iteration needed); specific gravity 1.01.

Check: a design (pumping) velocity is not stated by the exam. Following the velocity-window rationale developed in Question 1(d) — fast enough to keep solids suspended, slow enough to limit friction loss and erosion — a mid-range design velocity of V = 1.5 m/s (within the typical 1–2 m/s slurry-pumping design range) is assumed. Specific gravity does NOT enter a head-in-metres-of-pumped-fluid calculation (Darcy-Weisbach head loss is expressed per unit weight of the fluid actually flowing, so it is dimensionally independent of density); it would only be needed to convert this head to a pressure rise (kPa) or to compute hydraulic pump power — flagged here as a common pitfall, not omitted data.

Find. Total dynamic head (TDH) of the pump.

datumBarn pitEl. 330.00 mPCentrifugal pumpStorage tankEl. 320.00 m200 m, 8-in PVC
Elevation profile from the barn collection pit (El. 330.00 m) to the storage tank (El. 320.00 m) — a 10 m elevation DROP over the 200 m, 8-inch PVC pumped line.

Approach. Apply the steady-flow energy equation between the barn collection pit (source, atmospheric, negligible approach velocity) and the tank discharge (atmospheric, pipe-exit velocity): $\text{TDH} = \Delta z + h_f + V^2/2g$, with the friction loss found from the Darcy-Weisbach equation using the given friction coefficient.

  1. Pipe velocity and flow at the assumed design velocity. Pipe area $A=\dfrac{\pi}{4}(0.2032)^2=0.0324\ \text{m}^2$; at $V=1.5\ \text{m/s}$, $Q=VA=\boxed{0.0486\ \text{m}^3/\text{s}}$ ($\approx$ 175 m³/h).
  2. Friction head loss (Darcy-Weisbach). $$h_f = f\frac{L}{D}\frac{V^2}{2g} = (0.07)\left(\frac{200}{0.2032}\right)\frac{(1.5)^2}{2(9.81)} = \boxed{7.90\ \text{m}}$$
  3. Static elevation change. The discharge (tank, El. 320.00 m) sits BELOW the source (barn pit, El. 330.00 m), so $$\Delta z = 320.00-330.00 = \boxed{-10.00\ \text{m}}\ \text{(a favourable, gravity-assisted 10 m drop)}$$
  4. Total dynamic head. Including the discharge velocity head $V^2/2g=0.115\ \text{m}$, $$\text{TDH} = \Delta z + h_f + \frac{V^2}{2g} = -10.00+7.90+0.12 = \boxed{-1.98\ \text{m}}$$ The NEGATIVE result is a genuine, physically meaningful finding, not an error: the 10 m elevation drop from barn to tank exceeds the computed friction loss, so gravity alone is more than sufficient to move the design flow through the line, and the specified centrifugal pump would in practice operate at a very low (near-zero) head — functioning more as a flow-rate controller/backflow safeguard than as a true lift pump. (Minor losses from bends, valves and fittings are not given in the source data and are not included; a few metres of minor-loss head would still likely leave the line net gravity-favourable or only marginally head-positive.)
QuantityResult
Assumed design velocity1.5 m/s
Pumped flow rate0.0486 m³/s (≈ 175 m³/h)
Friction head loss7.90 m
Static elevation change−10.00 m (gravity-assisted)
Total dynamic head−1.98 m (gravity exceeds friction loss)

3) Annual application rate and land area requirement (10 marks).

Given. Manure fertilizer values per m³: organic N = 1.2 kg, NH4-N = 0.3 kg, NO3-N = 0 kg. Mineralization rate: year 1 = 40%, year 2 = 20%, year 3+ = 5%. Ammonia volatilization after application = 30%. Corn N uptake target = 120 kg/ha. Starter nitrogen = 10 kg/ha applied separately at planting.

Find. Annual manure application rate (m³/ha) and land area requirement (ha) to just satisfy the corn nitrogen requirement, using the year-2 mineralization rate as the steady-state organic-N availability (per the question's own instruction).

  1. Available nitrogen per m³ of manure at steady state. Plant-available ammonium-N after volatilization loss: $$N_{NH_4,avail} = 0.3\times(1-0.30) = 0.21\ \text{kg/m}^3$$ Organic-N mineralized at the steady-state (year-2) rate: $$N_{org,avail} = 1.2\times0.20 = 0.24\ \text{kg/m}^3$$ (NO3-N contributes nothing, as it is given as 0 kg/m³.) Total available nitrogen per m³ of manure: $$N_{avail} = 0.21+0.24 = \boxed{0.45\ \text{kg N/m}^3}$$
  2. Nitrogen the manure must supply. The corn's total requirement is 120 kg/ha; 10 kg/ha of that is already supplied by the separate starter-nitrogen application, so $$N_{from\ manure} = 120-10 = \boxed{110\ \text{kg/ha}}$$
  3. Annual application rate. $$\text{Rate} = \frac{N_{from\ manure}}{N_{avail}} = \frac{110}{0.45} = \boxed{244.4\ \text{m}^3/\text{ha}}$$
  4. Land area requirement. Applying the full 10,000 m³/yr production at this rate, $$A = \frac{10{,}000}{244.4} = \boxed{40.9\ \text{ha}}$$
QuantityResult
Available N per m³ manure (steady state)0.45 kg N/m³
N required from manure110 kg/ha
Annual application rate244.4 m³/ha
Land area requirement40.9 ha