NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

22-Agric-B7 Principles of Hydrology · May 2014

Question 1 of 6: Rainfall Intensity, Depth and Runoff Hydrographs for a Frozen Watershed

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

National Exams — May 2014 — 04-Agric-B7, Principles of Hydrology (Soil Hydrology). Three-hour, open-book exam; any non-communicating calculator is permitted. Format: five questions constitute a complete paper, each of equal value; most questions require an answer involving calculations.

Reference texts: Chow, Maidment & Mays, Applied Hydrology — IDF curves, unit-hydrograph/critical-duration behaviour, Horton infiltration, flood-frequency analysis; Viessman & Lewis, Introduction to Hydrology — hydrologic cycle terminology, detention-pond routing; Todd & Mays, Groundwater Hydrology — Thiem equation for confined and unconfined aquifers, well-test assumptions.

Question 1: Rainfall Intensity, Depth and Runoff Hydrographs for a Frozen Watershed (20 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given. Watershed area $A=5\ \text{km}^2$, completely frozen with little/no snow cover (so essentially all rainfall becomes direct runoff — no infiltration losses to speak of). Time of concentration $t_c=60$ min. IDF curve (read from the attached figure) passes through $(30\ \text{min},\,100\ \text{mm/hr})$, $(60\ \text{min},\,50\ \text{mm/hr})$, $(120\ \text{min},\,30\ \text{mm/hr})$, $(240\ \text{min},\,15\ \text{mm/hr})$.

Find. (a) The rainfall intensity and total depth for storms of duration $t_c/2$, $t_c$, and $2t_c$. (b) A qualitative sketch comparing the three resulting runoff hydrographs.

0 60 120 180 240 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 Duration, min Intensity, mm/hr 30 min, 100 mm/hr 60 min, 50 mm/hr 120 min, 30 mm/hr t_c=60 min
Figure 1a — the paper's own IDF curve, with the three storm durations asked for ($t_c/2$, $t_c$, $2t_c$) marked at their read intensities.

Approach. Read the intensity directly off the given IDF curve at each of the three specified durations (they coincide with the curve's own labelled points), then multiply intensity by duration to get each storm's total rainfall depth.

  1. Storm durations relative to $t_c$. $$t_1=\tfrac{t_c}{2}=30\ \text{min}\qquad t_2=t_c=60\ \text{min}\qquad t_3=2t_c=120\ \text{min}$$
  2. Intensities from the IDF curve and resulting depths $P=i\times t$. Reading each duration straight off the curve: $$i_1=100\ \text{mm/hr}\ \Rightarrow\ P_1=100\left(\tfrac{30}{60}\right)=\boxed{50\ \text{mm}}$$ $$i_2=50\ \text{mm/hr}\ \Rightarrow\ P_2=50\left(\tfrac{60}{60}\right)=\boxed{50\ \text{mm}}$$ $$i_3=30\ \text{mm/hr}\ \Rightarrow\ P_3=30\left(\tfrac{120}{60}\right)=\boxed{60\ \text{mm}}$$ Discussion: intensity keeps falling as duration doubles, but not fast enough to offset the longer duration — the half-$t_c$ and full-$t_c$ storms happen to deliver the same 50 mm depth here, while the $2t_c$ storm delivers slightly more total rain (60 mm) despite its much lower intensity.

(b) Comparative hydrograph sketch (no calculation required). Because the frozen, snow-free ground produces essentially 100% direct runoff, each storm's hydrograph shape is governed purely by how its duration compares with $t_c=60$ min. The 30-min storm ($t

0 60 120 180 240 0 0.8 1.5 2.2 3.0 Time, min Q (relative) storm A (t=t_c/2) storm B (t=t_c) storm C (t=2t_c)
Figure 1b — qualitative comparison: storm A (30 min) is short and sharp with the lowest peak; storm B (60 min) reaches the full equilibrium peak, the highest of the three; storm C (120 min) reaches the same equilibrium peak but holds it flat for the extra duration, giving the longest base and greatest volume.
Storm durationIntensityDepth
$t_c/2=30$ min100 mm/hr50 mm
$t_c=60$ min50 mm/hr50 mm
$2t_c=120$ min30 mm/hr60 mm
← Paper overview