NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

04-BS-14 · May 2016

Question 2 of 4: Relative Time

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

National Exams May 2016 — 04-BS-14, Geology. Closed-book, 3 hours; candidates may use only a Casio or Sharp-approved calculator. Four questions constitute a complete exam paper (Questions 1–4 mandatory). On Question 4 only the first four (4) answered sub-questions are normally marked; all seven (25–31) are answered here as a complete study resource. Total marks for the exam = 100.

Reference texts: Marshak, Earth: Portrait of a Planet (relative dating, unconformities, plate tectonics, glacial and fluvial landforms, mass wasting, rock mechanics, mineralogy); Goodman, engineering-geology mapping methods (strike and dip, three-point problem, apparent dip, structure contours); Freeze & Cherry, Groundwater (aquifers/aquicludes, permafrost, active layer).

Question 2: Relative Time (20 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

21. Chronology of Figure Q21

[Figure not reproduced. See the official exam paper.]

Figure Q21 as printed on the exam paper.

Reading the section. The printed figure shows the following units and structures:

Applying original horizontality, superposition, cross-cutting relationships, inclusions and unconformity recognition, the events from oldest to youngest are:

  1. Deposition of J, then K, then the overlying beds, then F and H as horizontal layers (original horizontality; superposition places J at the base of the preserved sequence).
  2. Tilting (folding) of the J–H package by tectonic stress. Tilting post-dates the youngest tilted bed.
  3. Uplift and erosion bevel the tilted beds flat, forming an angular unconformity (the flat base of B truncating the tilted beds).
  4. Subsidence and deposition of limestone B on that surface (a marine limestone implies a return to below sea level).
  5. Intrusion of dike G, cutting the tilted beds and B (cross-cutting relationships: G is younger than everything it cuts).
  6. Erosion of the top of B and G, then deposition of E. G is cut off at the base of E and does not enter it, so G is older than E and the B/E contact is an erosion surface (a disconformity: parallel beds above and below).
  7. Normal faulting along D, which offsets B and E (so it is younger than E) and records extension.
  8. Intrusion of pluton I, which cuts J, K, the tilted beds, B, E and fault D, and bakes a contact-metamorphic rim into the rocks it touches. Because I cuts the fault, I is younger than D.
  9. Uplift and erosion bevel E and the top of the pluton flat. Where C now rests on the igneous rock of I the contact is a nonconformity; where it rests on E it is a disconformity. The pebbles at the base of C are clasts eroded from the underlying rocks, which confirms this erosion surface.
  10. Deposition of C, then A (superposition), both undisturbed, so no later tilting, faulting or intrusion affected the section.

What cannot be dated relative to each other: H and F. Both sit at the top of the tilted package on opposite sides of dike G, directly beneath the unconformity. Neither lies on top of the other, they share no contact (G separates them), and no fossil or cross-cutting evidence is given. So it cannot be determined whether H is older than, younger than or the same age as F (they may be a sideways change of one bed from conglomerate to sandstone). Every other pair can be ordered. For example, G is older than E, which is older than D and I, even though G never touches D or I.

Figure Q21 event sequence (oldest → youngest)1Deposit J, K ... F, H2Tilting3Erosion: angular unc.4Deposit limestone B5Dike G6Erosion; deposit E7Normal fault D8Pluton I intrudes9Erosion: nonconformity10Deposit C, then A
Sequence read from Figure Q21: tilted package, angular unconformity, B, dike G, disconformity and E, fault D, pluton I, nonconformity, then C and A. The relative age of H and F cannot be determined.

22. Three types of unconformities

An unconformity is a surface in the rock record representing a gap in time — a period of non-deposition and/or erosion between the rocks below and above it. The three fundamental types are distinguished by the character of the rocks immediately below and above the surface:

TypeWhat lies below / aboveRecognized by
Angular unconformityTilted or folded, layered (usually sedimentary) rock below; younger, flat-lying (or differently oriented) layers above, truncating the lower beds at an angle.A visible angular discordance in bedding attitude across the surface — the clearest unconformity to spot in outcrop or cross-section.
DisconformityParallel, flat-lying sedimentary layers both below and above — no angular discordance.An irregular (erosional, e.g. channelled or karstic) surface, a basal lag/conglomerate, and/or a missing interval of the fossil/stratigraphic record, even though bedding stays parallel on both sides.
NonconformityOlder crystalline rock (igneous or metamorphic) below; younger sedimentary layers deposited directly on top.The contrast in rock type itself — sedimentary strata resting on an erosion surface cut into massive, non-layered igneous/metamorphic basement.
Angular unconformitytilted beds / flat bedsDisconformityparallel beds, irregular gapNonconformitycrystalline basement / strata
Schematic cross-sections: angular unconformity (tilted truncated below), disconformity (parallel beds, erosional/lag surface), nonconformity (sedimentary strata on crystalline basement).