NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

04-BS-6 · December 2013

Question 3 of 8: Largest Load on a Two-Rod Truss (Euler Buckling)

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

National Exams December 2013 – 04-BS-6: Mechanics of Materials
3 hours duration, closed book (one hand-written aid sheet permitted). Any five of the eight questions constitute a complete paper; all eight are solved below as a complete study resource.

Reference texts: R.C. Hibbeler, Mechanics of Materials, 10th ed. (Ch. 5 torsion, Ch. 6 shear/moment diagrams & composite beams, Ch. 7 transverse shear, Ch. 8 combined loadings, Ch. 9 stress transformation, Ch. 12 deflection by integration, Ch. 13 buckling); F. Beer & E.R. Johnston, Mechanics of Materials; W. Gere & B. Goodno, Mechanics of Materials (alternates). A W-shape properties table printed on the exam's last page is not needed — every question supplies its own section dimensions.

Question 3: Largest Load on a Two-Rod Truss (Euler Buckling) (20 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

PABC5 m1 m4 mFig. Q3 – two-rod truss (buckling)
Two-rod truss: A(−5,0), B(0,4), C(1,0) m; P applied downward at B.

Given.

QuantityValue
Geometry (A→B→C offsets)5 m horiz. / 4 m vert. (AB); 1 m horiz. / 4 m vert. (BC)
Rod section100 mm OD, 5 mm wall (90 mm ID), both members
Buckling factor of safety2 (Euler load only; no FS on yield)
Yield strength / E (steel)240 MPa / 200 GPa

Find. The largest P that keeps both two-force members within their governing (buckling or yield) capacity.

Approach. Resolve joint B for the member forces in terms of P, compute each member's Euler buckling capacity (pinned-pinned, K = 1) and yield capacity, then find the P that first exhausts the more critical member.

  1. Member lengths and joint-B equilibrium. $$L_{AB}=\sqrt{5^2+4^2}=6.403\ \text{m}, \qquad L_{BC}=\sqrt{1^2+4^2}=4.123\ \text{m}$$ Resolving the two axial member forces against the applied P at B (both rods carry the load down into their supports, so both come out in compression): $$F_{AB} = -0.2668\,P, \qquad F_{BC} = -0.8590\,P$$
  2. Section properties (both rods identical). $$A = \frac{\pi}{4}\left(100^2-90^2\right) = 1492.3\ \text{mm}^2, \qquad I = \frac{\pi}{64}\left(100^4-90^4\right) = 1.688\times10^6\ \text{mm}^4$$
  3. Buckling and yield capacity of each member. $$P_{cr}=\frac{\pi^2 EI}{L^2}\ (K=1),\qquad P_{cr,allow}=\frac{P_{cr}}{2},\qquad P_{yield}=F_y A = 240(1492.3)=358.1\ \text{kN}$$ Member AB ($L=6403$ mm): $P_{cr}=81.27$ kN $\Rightarrow P_{cr,allow}=40.64$ kN (governs over 358.1 kN yield).
    Member BC ($L=4123$ mm): $P_{cr}=196.0$ kN $\Rightarrow P_{cr,allow}=98.01$ kN (governs over yield). Both members are buckling-governed, as expected for such slender rods.
  4. Largest P from each member, and the controlling value. $$P_{AB} = \frac{40.64}{0.2668} = 152.3\ \text{kN}, \qquad P_{BC} = \frac{98.01}{0.8590} = 114.1\ \text{kN}$$ Member BC reaches its buckling capacity first, so $$\boxed{P_{allow} = 114.1\ \text{kN}}$$ (At this load, $F_{AB}=0.2668(114.1)=30.4$ kN compression — comfortably below AB's own 40.64 kN capacity, confirming BC governs.)

Final Results.

QuantityValue
A, I (each rod)1492 mm2, 1.688×106 mm4
Pcr,allow (AB / BC)40.64 kN / 98.01 kN
FAB / FBC at Pallow30.4 kN (C) / 98.0 kN (C)
Largest load P114.1 kN, governed by buckling of BC