NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

04-BS-6 · December 2014

Question 1 of 8: Overhang-Beam Deflection by Integration

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

04-BS-6: Mechanics of Materials — National Exams, December 2014

3 hours duration. Closed book (one hand-written aid sheet permitted). Any FIVE of the eight questions constitute a complete paper; all eight are solved below as a complete study resource.

Reference texts: Hibbeler, Mechanics of Materials, 10th ed.; Beer, Johnston, DeWolf & Mazurek, Mechanics of Materials, 7th ed.; Gere & Goodno, Mechanics of Materials, 8th ed.

Question 1: Overhang-Beam Deflection by Integration (20 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given.

Span A–B (pin to roller)5 m
Overhang B–C3 m
UDL on overhangw = 10 kN/m, downward
SectionW200×22, Ix = 20.0×106 mm4
Elastic modulusE = 200 GPa
Allowable stresses (context only)σallow=240 MPa, τallow=60 MPa

Find. The deflection and slope at C (the free end of the overhang), using the method of double integration.

ABC10 kN/m5 m3 m
Beam elevation: pin at A, roller at B (5 m away), 3 m overhang to free end C carrying a 10 kN/m UDL.

Approach. Find the reactions, write M(x) for each of the two regions (A–B and B–C), integrate each twice with its own constants, and apply continuity/support boundary conditions to solve for all four constants.

  1. Reactions. Taking moments about A: $$R_B(5) = w(3)(5+1.5)\ \Rightarrow\ R_B=39\text{ kN}.$$ Then $$R_A = w(3)-R_B = 30-39=-9\text{ kN}$$ (the pin reaction is actually 9 kN downward — expected, since the whole load sits on the overhang and tries to lift A).
  2. Moment equations. Region 1 (0≤x≤5 m, no load): $$M_1(x)=R_A x.$$ Region 2 (5≤x≤8 m, UDL from B to x): $$M_2(x)=R_A x + R_B(x-5) - \dfrac{w(x-5)^2}{2}.$$
  3. Integrate region 1 twice. $$EI\,\theta_1=\int M_1\,dx + C_1,\qquad EI\,y_1=\int\!\int M_1\,dx + C_1x+C_2.$$ Boundary conditions $y_1(0)=0$ and $y_1(5\text{ m})=0$ (both supports) fix $C_1,C_2$.
  4. Integrate region 2 twice. $$EI\,\theta_2=\int M_2\,dx + C_3,\qquad EI\,y_2=\int\!\int M_2\,dx + C_3x+C_4.$$ Continuity at $x=5$ m requires $y_2(5)=0$ (support B again) and $\theta_2(5)=\theta_1(5)$ (no kink in the elastic curve), which fix $C_3,C_4$.
  5. Evaluate at C (x = 8 m). With $EI = (200{,}000)(20.0\times10^6)=4.0\times10^{12}\text{ N}\cdot\text{mm}^2$, substituting x = 8000 mm into $y_2$ and $\theta_2$ gives $$\boxed{y_C = 81.56\ \text{mm (downward)}}\qquad \boxed{\theta_C = -0.03000\ \text{rad} = -1.719^{\circ}}$$
QuantityValue
Reaction at A, RA9.00 kN ↓ (i.e. RA=−9 kN in the up-positive convention)
Reaction at B, RB39.00 kN ↑
Deflection at C, yC81.56 mm (downward)
Slope at C, θC-0.03000 rad = -1.719°
← Paper overview