Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
National Exams December 2015 — 04-BS-6: Mechanics of Materials (3 hours, closed book,
one hand-written aid sheet permitted). Any FIVE of the eight questions constitute a complete paper on the official exam; every question is answered below.
Reference texts: Hibbeler, Mechanics of Materials, 10th ed. (beam
deflection, torsion, transformation of stress, combined loading, columns); CISC Handbook of
Steel Construction (W-shape section properties, attached to this exam).
Given. The printed figure shows the curved torque arrows
at C and D sweep the same rotational sense, while the arrow at B sweeps the opposite
sense — i.e. TB opposes TC and TD.
Stepped shaft ABCD (fixed at A) with the applied torques and the resulting internal-torque diagram (CW positive).
Find. τmax in the shaft and its distribution over the governing
cross-section; the angle of twist at D; the consequence of doubling all three torques.
Approach. Take CW as positive, sum the applied torques on the free-end side of a
cut through each segment to get the internal torque, then apply $\tau=Tc/J$ and
$\phi=\sum TL/(GJ)$ segment by segment.
Internal torque per segment (cut then sum everything toward the free end D):
$$T_{AB}=T_B+T_C+T_D = -7+4+1 = -2\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}\qquad T_{BC}=T_C+T_D=5\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}\qquad T_{CD}=T_D=1\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}$$
Shear stress in each segment, $\tau = Tc/J$ with $J=\pi d^4/32$ (solid) or
$\pi(d_o^4-d_i^4)/32$ (hollow):
$$J_{AB}=\frac{\pi(40)^4}{32}=2.513\times10^5\ \text{mm}^4 \;\Rightarrow\; \tau_{AB}=\frac{(2\times10^6)(20)}{2.513\times10^5}=159.2\ \text{MPa}$$
$$J_{BC}=\frac{\pi(60)^4}{32}=1.272\times10^6\ \text{mm}^4 \;\Rightarrow\; \tau_{BC}=\frac{(5\times10^6)(30)}{1.272\times10^6}=117.9\ \text{MPa}$$
$$J_{CD}=\frac{\pi(40^4-30^4)}{32}=1.718\times10^5\ \text{mm}^4 \;\Rightarrow\; \tau_{CD}=\frac{(1\times10^6)(20)}{1.718\times10^5}=116.4\ \text{MPa}$$
$$\boxed{\tau_{max}=159.2\ \text{MPa, in segment AB}\ (<\tau_Y=250\ \text{MPa}\Rightarrow\text{still elastic})}$$
The stress is zero at the shaft centre and increases linearly to this value at the outer radius
(part (a) sketch below).
Angle of twist at D (segment twists accumulate with sign):
$$\phi_D=\sum\frac{T_iL_i}{GJ_i}=\frac{(-2\times10^6)(400)}{80000(2.513\times10^5)}+\frac{(5\times10^6)(1500)}{80000(1.272\times10^6)}+\frac{(1\times10^6)(800)}{80000(1.718\times10^5)}$$
$$\boxed{\phi_D = 0.09210\ \text{rad} = 5.28^{\circ}}$$
Part (c): doubling the loads. Every internal torque and hence every stress
scales by exactly 2 (linear elasticity), so
$$\tau_{AB,\text{doubled}} = 2(159.2)=318.3\ \text{MPa} > \tau_Y = 250\ \text{MPa}$$
Segment AB would yield in shear. The elastic formulas $\tau=Tc/J$ and
$\phi=TL/(GJ)$ would no longer hold for AB — the shaft would develop a plastic (yielded) outer
annulus there, the twist would grow disproportionately faster than the applied torque, and the
design would need to be re-sized (or the AB diameter increased) to remain safe; segments BC and CD
(235.8 and 232.8 MPa doubled) would still be elastic but with very little margin left.
Shear-stress distribution across the AB cross-section (r=20 mm) — linear in r, zero at the centre.