Question 8 of 8: Composite Concrete–Steel Cantilever Beam
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
National Exams May 2015 – 04-BS-6: Mechanics of Materials
3 hours duration, closed book (one hand-written aid sheet permitted). Any five of the eight
questions constitute a complete paper; all eight are solved below as a complete study resource.
Reference texts: R.C. Hibbeler, Mechanics of Materials, 10th ed.
(Ch. 5 torsion, Ch. 6 shear/moment diagrams & composite beams, Ch. 7 transverse shear,
Ch. 8 combined loadings, Ch. 9 stress transformation, Ch. 12 deflection by integration,
Ch. 13 buckling); F. Beer & E.R. Johnston, Mechanics of Materials; W. Gere &
B. Goodno, Mechanics of Materials (alternates). A wide-flange (W-shape) properties
table printed on the exam's last page supplies the section used in Question 2.
Cantilever composite beam, 4 m span, w = 3 kN/m; transformed cross-section and the resulting stress distribution (steel plate in tension at the top, concrete in compression at the bottom, with a tension zone in the upper part of the concrete).
Given.
Quantity
Value
Span, load
4 m, fixed support; w = 3 kN/m UDL
Concrete section
200 mm wide × 450 mm deep
Steel plate
200 mm wide × 10 mm thick, at the TOP
Allowable σ: concrete
3 MPa tension, 15 MPa compression
Allowable σ: steel
240 MPa
E: concrete, steel
30 GPa, 210 GPa
Find. (a) Whether the beam supports w = 3 kN/m (check every material at every
governing fibre). (b) The maximum w before any material fails.
Approach. Transform the steel plate into an equivalent width of concrete using
$n=E_s/E_c$, locate the transformed section's centroid and moment of inertia, then evaluate
$\sigma=M(y-\bar y)/I_t$ at every fibre where a different material or a different allowable
(tension vs compression) applies — the top of the steel, the top of the concrete (just below
the plate), and the bottom of the concrete.
Maximum moment. Cantilever fixed end, UDL only:
$$M_{max}=\frac{wL^2}{2}=\frac{3(4)^2}{2}=24.0\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}\ \text{(hogging
— TENSION on top, compression on bottom)}$$
Transformed section. $$n=\frac{E_s}{E_c}=\frac{210}{30}=7.0$$
Transform the steel plate to an equivalent concrete width $7(200)=1400$ mm (same 10 mm
thickness), sitting on top of the 200×450 mm concrete block. Measuring y from the bottom:
$$A_{concrete}=200(450)=90{,}000\ \text{mm}^2\ (\bar y=225\ \text{mm}), \qquad
A_{steel,t}=1400(10)=14{,}000\ \text{mm}^2\ (\bar y=455\ \text{mm})$$
$$\bar y = \frac{90{,}000(225)+14{,}000(455)}{104{,}000}=\boxed{256.0\ \text{mm from the
bottom}}$$
$$I_t = \left[\frac{200(450)^3}{12}+90{,}000(225-256.0)^2\right]+
\left[\frac{1400(10)^3}{12}+14{,}000(455-256.0)^2\right]=\boxed{2.160\times10^9\
\text{mm}^4}$$
Stress at every governing fibre ($\sigma=M(y-\bar y)/I_t$; steel stress is $n\times$
the transformed value).
Bottom of concrete ($y=0$, maximum compression):
$$\sigma_{bot}=\frac{24\times10^6(0-256.0)}{2.160\times10^9}=\boxed{-2.84\ \text{MPa
(compression)}}\quad(<15\ \text{MPa allowable, OK})$$
Top of concrete, just under the plate ($y=450$ mm):
$$\sigma_{interface}=\frac{24\times10^6(450-256.0)}{2.160\times10^9}=\boxed{+2.16\
\text{MPa (tension)}}\quad(<3\ \text{MPa allowable, OK — but the tightest check, at
72\% of capacity})$$
Top of steel ($y=460$ mm, actual stress $=n\times$ transformed):
$$\sigma_{steel}=7\!\left[\frac{24\times10^6(460-256.0)}{2.160\times10^9}\right]=
\boxed{+15.9\ \text{MPa (tension)}}\quad(<240\ \text{MPa allowable, OK})$$
(a) Conclusion. All three checks pass at w = 3 kN/m:
$$\boxed{\text{The composite beam CAN support the loading shown; the governing limit is
concrete tension at the steel–concrete interface (2.16 of 3 MPa allowable, 72\%
utilized).}}$$
(b) Maximum w. Every stress scales linearly with M (hence with w); scaling
each fibre's stress to its own allowable and taking the smallest resulting w:
$$w_{bottom-conc}=3\!\left(\frac{15}{2.84}\right)=15.8\ \text{kN/m}, \qquad
w_{interface}=3\!\left(\frac{3}{2.16}\right)=4.17\ \text{kN/m}, \qquad
w_{steel}=3\!\left(\frac{240}{15.9}\right)=45.4\ \text{kN/m}$$
$$\boxed{w_{max}=4.17\ \text{kN/m, governed by concrete tension at the interface}}$$
Final Results.
Quantity
Value
Transformed &bar;y, It
256.0 mm from bottom, 2.160×109 mm4
σ bottom concrete / interface concrete / top steel
−2.84 MPa / +2.16 MPa / +15.9 MPa
(a) Supports w=3 kN/m?
YES — governed by concrete tension at the interface (72% utilized)