04-BS-6 · December 2016
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
National Exams December 2016 — 04-BS-6: Mechanics of Materials (3 hours, closed book, one hand-written aid sheet permitted). Any FIVE of the eight questions constitute a complete paper on the official exam; every question is answered below. A wide-flange (W-shape) section-property table is attached at the end of the official exam; every question below supplies its own built-up section, so the table is not needed for any of the eight solutions.
Reference texts: Hibbeler, Mechanics of Materials, 10th ed. (shear/moment diagrams, deflection by integration, combined axial+bending, transformation of stress via Mohr's circle, torsion of stepped shafts, axial members and pin connections, Euler column buckling).
Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.
Given. Horizontal beam AB, span 3 m, pinned at A to a wall; a tension member runs from a second wall pin C (directly above A, 1.5 m higher) down to B at the far end of the beam. A 40 kN/m UDL covers the full span. The T-section (150 mm flange at the bottom, 30×200 mm stem on top) is given in the figure.
| Quantity | Value |
|---|---|
| Span, L | 3 m (A to B) |
| Rise of C above A | 1.5 m |
| UDL, w | 40 kN/m, full span |
| Section | T-section, 150×25 mm flange (bottom), 30×200 mm stem (top) |
Find. Normal-stress distribution and maximum shear stress at the section 1 m from A; and the effect of an off-centroid pin connection.
Approach. The tension member CB is a two-force member; find its tension and the pin reaction at A from equilibrium of the whole beam, then cut at x=1 m (a section that does not include B or the cable) to get the internal N, V, M there, and finally combine axial and bending stress (uniform + linear, since the pins sit at the centroid so there is no added eccentricity).
Part (c). If the pins at A and B were NOT at the section centroid, the axial force N (from the pin reaction / cable component) would act with an eccentricity $e$ relative to the centroidal axis, introducing an ADDITIONAL bending moment $M_{ecc}=N\!\cdot\!e$ on top of the moment already caused by the transverse loading. The stress distribution would no longer be simply "uniform axial + bending about the applied transverse loads" — every section along the beam would carry this extra constant moment from the eccentric axial force, shifting the true neutral axis and increasing the peak stress on whichever fibre the eccentricity moment reinforces. (This is exactly the mechanism exploited deliberately in Question 3's spreader-beam sibling problems, where an off-axis cable pin is used to counteract bending — here it would be an unwanted side effect.)
| Quantity | Value |
|---|---|
| Cable tension, T | 134.2 kN |
| N at x=1 m | -120000 N (compression) |
| V at x=1 m | 20000 N |
| M at x=1 m | 4.000e+07 N·mm |
| σtop | -128.3 MPa (C) |
| σbot | 53.9 MPa (T) |
| τmax | 4.155 MPa |