Question 8 of 8: Cast-Iron Beam With an Unsymmetric Section
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
National Exams May 2017 — 04-BS-6: Mechanics of Materials (3 hours, closed book, one hand-written aid sheet permitted). Any FIVE of the eight questions constitute a complete paper on the official exam; every question is answered below. A wide-flange (W-shape) section-property table is attached at the end of the official exam; every question below supplies its own built-up or standard section directly, so the table is not needed for any of the eight solutions.
Reference texts: Hibbeler, Mechanics of Materials, 10th ed. (axial members with initial gaps, shear/moment diagrams, deflection by direct integration, transformation of stress via Mohr's circle, combined axial+bending on eccentrically-loaded columns, torsion of stepped shafts, Euler column buckling, unsymmetric-section flexure of brittle materials).
Question 8: Cast-Iron Beam With an Unsymmetric Section (20 marks)
Given. Simply supported cast-iron beam, span 4 m, UDL 25 kN/m. Unsymmetric I-section: bottom flange 300×20 mm (wide, tension side), web 30×200 mm, top flange 120×20 mm. Allowable tension 45 MPa, compression 100 MPa, shear 10 MPa.
Quantity
Value
Span, L
4 m
UDL, w
25 kN/m
Bottom flange
300×20 mm
Web
30×200 mm
Top flange
120×20 mm
Allow. tension / compression / shear
45 / 100 / 10 MPa
Find. Whether the beam fails in flexure or shear at 25 kN/m, and the maximum sustainable load.
Simply supported beam, 4 m span, 25 kN/m UDL.
Unsymmetric section: wide 300 mm bottom flange (tension side), narrow 120 mm top flange.
Approach. Locate the centroid of the unsymmetric section, compute the maximum moment and shear from statics, then check tensile, compressive, and shear stress against their respective allowables — scaling linearly to find the governing capacity.
Section properties. Bottom flange 300×20 mm, web 30×200 mm, top flange 120×20 mm, overall depth 240 mm. Locating the centroid from the bottom:
$$\bar y=92.50\text{ mm},\qquad I=1.1103e+08\text{ mm}^4$$
The wide (300 mm) flange at the bottom pulls the centroid toward that side, giving $y_{bot}=92.50$ mm, less than $y_{top}=147.50$ mm — deliberately reducing the stress on the weaker tension side.
Design moment and shear. Simply supported, L=4 m, w=25 kN/m:
$$M_{max}=\frac{wL^2}{8}=50.0\text{ kN}\!\cdot\!\text{m}\ (\text{sagging, bottom in tension}),\qquad V_{max}=\frac{wL}{2}=50\text{ kN}$$
(a) Flexural check.
$$\sigma_{tension}(\text{bottom})=\frac{M_{max}\,y_{bot}}{I}=\boxed{41.66\text{ MPa}}\ (\lt\ 45\text{ MPa allow}),\qquad \sigma_{compression}(\text{top})=\frac{M_{max}\,y_{top}}{I}=\boxed{66.42\text{ MPa}}\ (\lt\ 100\text{ MPa allow})$$
Neither exceeds its allowable — the beam does NOT fail in flexure at 25 kN/m, though the tension side is close (ratio 0.93).
(b) Shear check. $Q_{NA}=573844$ mm³, giving
$$\tau_{max}=\frac{V_{max}Q_{NA}}{It_w}=\boxed{8.614\text{ MPa}}\ (\lt\ 10\text{ MPa allow})$$
The beam does NOT fail in shear either.
(c) Maximum sustainable load. All three stresses scale linearly with w, so the governing (smallest) capacity is
$$w_{tension}=27.01,\quad w_{compression}=37.64,\quad w_{shear}=29.02\ \text{kN/m}$$
$$\boxed{w_{max}=27.01\text{ kN/m}}\ \text{(governed by tensile flexural stress)}$$
Flexural stress distribution: +41.7 MPa tension at the bottom, −66.4 MPa compression at the top.