Question 5 of 13: Viscosity and Tank Equilibrium Level — Gasoline vs. Lubricating Oil
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
04-BS-7 Mechanics of Fluids — December 2015 (National Examinations, three hours, closed book). Section A (Calculative) offers 9 questions and instructs "do seven"; Section B (Analytical) offers 4 questions and instructs "do three." Every question is answered below (13 of 13), so students can use the full paper as a study resource. Constants used throughout (from the paper's own Constants page): g = 9.81 m/s², ρwater = 1000 kg/m³, ρair = 1.19 kg/m³ (20°C) / 1.21 kg/m³ (15°C), μair = 1.8×10⁻⁵ N·s/m², Rair = 287 J/kg·K, Rhelium = 2077 J/kg·K, patm = 100 kPa.
Reference texts: F. M. White, Fluid Mechanics, 8th ed. (McGraw-Hill) — fluid statics and manometry (Ch. 2), control-volume momentum/energy and propulsion (Ch. 3), potential/inviscid flow around cylinders (Ch. 8), viscosity and Newtonian shear (Ch. 1), pipe friction and the Moody chart (Ch. 6), and drag on immersed bodies (Ch. 7).
Question 5: Viscosity and Tank Equilibrium Level — Gasoline vs. Lubricating Oil (5 marks)
Fig. Q5 — the gasoline level settles at 408 mm inside the 500 mm tank; the oil's required equilibrium level (588 mm) is drawn ABOVE the rim to show it can never actually be reached — the tank overflows first.
Approach. (a) read absolute viscosity directly off the attached chart at 20°C; (b)/(c) at equilibrium, inflow equals orifice outflow, so solve the standard orifice equation Q = CdAo√(2gh) for h; (d) compare the two required levels against the tank's actual 500 mm height.
Part (a) — Read viscosities from the Absolute Viscosity chart at 20°C. Follow the vertical 20°C line up to the "Gasoline, s=0.716" curve and the "SAE 30 Eastern lubricating oil" curve:
$$\mu_{gasoline} \approx 2.9\times10^{-4}\ \text{N}\cdot\text{s/m}^2, \qquad \mu_{oil} \approx 3.8\times10^{-1}\ \text{N}\cdot\text{s/m}^2$$
Oil is roughly 1300 times more viscous than gasoline at the same temperature.
Part (b) — Orifice area and gasoline equilibrium level. Solving the orifice equation $Q_{in}=C_dA_o\sqrt{2gh}$ for h, with $A_o=\frac{\pi}{4}(0.010)^2=7.854\times10^{-5}\ \text{m}^2$:
$$h = \frac{1}{2g}\left(\frac{Q_{in}}{C_dA_o}\right)^2 = \frac{1}{19.62}\left(\frac{2.0\times10^{-4}}{0.90(7.854\times10^{-5})}\right)^2 = \frac{1}{19.62}(2.829)^2 = \boxed{0.408\ \text{m} = 408\ \text{mm}}$$
This is comfortably inside the 500 mm tank.
Part (d) — Compare and check the Reynolds numbers through the orifice. The orifice exit velocities are $V_{gas}=2.83$ m/s and $V_{oil}=3.40$ m/s, giving
$$Re_{gas} = \frac{\rho_{gas}V_{gas}d_o}{\mu_{gas}} = \frac{716(2.83)(0.010)}{2.9\times10^{-4}} \approx 7.0\times10^4\ \text{(turbulent, high }C_d\text{)}$$
$$Re_{oil} = \frac{\rho_{oil}V_{oil}d_o}{\mu_{oil}} = \frac{891(3.40)(0.010)}{3.8\times10^{-1}} \approx 80\ \text{(deep laminar/viscous regime, low }C_d\text{)}$$
The oil's much lower orifice Reynolds number is exactly why its discharge coefficient is lower (0.75 vs. 0.90) — viscous losses dominate, so a higher head is needed to push the same flow through. Since the required oil level (588 mm) EXCEEDS the tank's actual height (500 mm), the oil tank never reaches a true equilibrium: it fills to the rim and overflows continuously, whereas the gasoline tank settles cleanly at 408 mm.
Quantity
Result
μgasoline (20°C)
≈ 2.9×10⁻⁴ N·s/m²
μoil (20°C)
≈ 0.38 N·s/m²
Gasoline equilibrium level
408 mm (steady, within tank)
Oil "equilibrium" level
588 mm > 500 mm tank height — tank overflows, never reaches equilibrium