NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

04-BS-7: May 2018

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

  1. Question 1 Multi-Fluid Manometer on a Water Pipe
  2. Question 2 Crosby Gauge Tester — Percent Error
  3. Question 3 Shower Curtain Deflection Angle
  4. Question 4 Submersible Fountain Pump Power
  5. Question 5 Beach Wave — Hydraulic Jump Power Dissipation
  6. Question 6 Pressure Drop in a Corrugated Air-Exchanger Pipe
  7. Question 7 Jet Engine Forward and Reverse Thrust
  8. Question 8 Terminal Velocity of a Table Tennis Ball
  9. Question 9 Wind and Gravity Loads on a Power-Line Conductor
  10. Question 10 Stability of a Floating Square Bar
  11. Question 11 The Laminar-to-Turbulent Friction-Factor Jump on the Moody Diagram
  12. Question 12 Stable Falling Orientation of a Hemisphere
  13. Question 13 Magnus Effect — Why Topspin Makes a Table Tennis Ball Dip

Start with Question 1 →

04-BS-7 Mechanics of Fluids — National Examination, 2018-May. Three (3) hours duration, closed book. Section A (Calculative, 9 questions, do 7) and Section B (Graphical & Analytical, 4 questions, do 3); every question is answered below regardless of the exam's "do N of M" instruction, so the set is a complete study resource.

Reference texts: White, F.M., Fluid Mechanics (8th ed.) — fluid statics and manometry (Ch. 2), Bernoulli and the energy equation (Ch. 3), viscous flow in ducts and the Moody chart (Ch. 6), flow past immersed bodies and drag (Ch. 7), potential flow and the Magnus effect (Ch. 8), open-channel flow and the hydraulic jump (Ch. 10), turbomachinery and jet propulsion (Ch. 11).

Check — assumptions used across this paper:
  • Q1's manometer chain is read off the extraction as a two-stage water–mercury–glycerine–(air)–glycerine–mercury system. The enclosed air pocket between the two glycerine columns is treated as weightless (uniform pressure), so only the one described open end is needed to close the hydrostatic chain back to pipe P; the second "opening" is not load-bearing for this calculation.
  • Q5's wave/hydraulic-jump analysis takes the depth "in front of the wave" (0.15 m, undisturbed, at rest) as the upstream state and "behind the wave" (0.75 m) as the downstream state, per the question's own prose (the raw figure-label ordering in the extraction is a reconstruction and is not used to override the stated text). The classic hydraulic-jump head-loss formula is applied to the given depths, and the swept flow rate uses the measured wave celerity directly — a standard engineering estimate, not a fully momentum-self-consistent bore solution.
  • Q6's air properties are taken at 20°C (domestic ambient, ρ=1.19 kg/m³) since no duct-air temperature is stated.
  • Q7(c)'s "discharged at right angles to the initial direction (20° becomes 0°)" is read as: the reverser's exhaust jet is normally angled 20° forward of the fully-radial (right-angle) direction; part (c) removes that forward lean entirely, leaving a purely radial (90° to the engine axis) discharge with zero axial velocity component.
  • Q8's terminal velocity and Q9's cable drag coefficient are obtained from the Reynolds-number relations the attached charts themselves plot (Morrison's sphere-drag correlation for Q8; the flat subcritical Cd≈1.2 plateau of the smooth-cylinder curve for Q9, since Re≈3×104 falls solidly within it).