Question 7 of 7: Magnetic Circuit — Gapped Core with Two Windings
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
National Exams 04-BS-9 Basic Electromagnetics. Three-hour, closed-book exam (approved Casio/Sharp calculator only). Constants given: $\varepsilon_0=8.854\times10^{-12}$ F/m, $\mu_0=4\pi\times10^{-7}$ H/m, $e=1.602\times10^{-19}$ C. Format: seven questions offered; any five constitute a complete paper and only the first five appearing in the answer book are marked. All seven are solved below for completeness.
Reference texts: Sadiku, Elements of Electromagnetics / Hayt & Buck, Engineering Electromagnetics — Coulomb's law and superposition of point charges, Gauss's law and conductors in electrostatic equilibrium, Ampère's law for cylindrical and bent-wire current distributions, the force between currents, Faraday's law (rotational and transformer EMF), parallel-plate capacitance and the force on a levitated charge, and magnetic-circuit (reluctance) analysis of a gapped core.
Question 7: Magnetic Circuit — Gapped Core with Two Windings (15 marks)
Find.(a) MMF. (b) flux $\phi$ and gap flux density $B$. (c) self inductance $L_L$. (d) mutual inductance $M$.
Single-loop rectangular core (not a three-limb "E" core): one continuous magnetic path with two small air gaps in series, and the two windings on opposite legs of the same loop.
Approach. Model the whole loop as one series magnetic circuit (reluctances in series, since it is a single closed path, not parallel branches). Because the combined gap length ($3$ mm) is negligible next to the core's own path length, take the core's own material length as the full mean path minus the (tiny) gap length, then add each gap's own reluctance (its permeability is $\mu_0$, not $\mu_0\mu_r$, so it is not negligible there). Solve $\phi=\text{MMF}/R_{\text{tot}}$, then $L=N^2/R_{\text{tot}}$ and $M=N_LN_R/R_{\text{tot}}$.
Part (a) — magnetomotive force. Only the left winding carries current:
$$\boxed{\mathcal F=N_Li=(100)(2)=200\ \text{A}\cdot\text{t}}$$
Part (b) — flux and gap flux density. Mean path length (core material, gaps' own extent dropped as instructed) $\ell_{\text{core}}=1.200-0.003=1.197$ m; cross-section $A=(0.05)(0.06)=3.0\times10^{-3}\ \text{m}^2$:
$$R_{\text{core}}=\frac{\ell_{\text{core}}}{\mu_0\mu_rA}=\frac{1.197}{(4\pi\times10^{-7})(2000)(3.0\times10^{-3})}=1.588\times10^5\ \text{A}\cdot\text{t/Wb}$$
$$R_{\text{gap}}=\frac{0.003}{\mu_0A}=\frac{0.003}{(4\pi\times10^{-7})(3.0\times10^{-3})}=7.958\times10^5\ \text{A}\cdot\text{t/Wb}$$
$$R_{\text{tot}}=R_{\text{core}}+R_{\text{gap}}=9.545\times10^5\ \text{A}\cdot\text{t/Wb}$$
(the two thin air gaps dominate the total reluctance, even though they are a tiny fraction of the path length — $\mu_r=2000$ makes the core $2000\times$ "easier" per metre than air). Then:
$$\phi=\frac{\mathcal F}{R_{\text{tot}}}=\frac{200}{9.545\times10^5}$$
$$\boxed{\phi=2.095\times10^{-4}\ \text{Wb}}$$
Since the cross-section is uniform all the way around the series loop, $B$ is the same in the gap as everywhere else:
$$B=\frac{\phi}{A}=\frac{2.095\times10^{-4}}{3.0\times10^{-3}}$$
$$\boxed{B_{\text{gap}}=0.0698\ \text{T}=69.8\ \text{mT}}$$
Part (c) — self inductance of the left coil.
$$L_L=\frac{N_L^2}{R_{\text{tot}}}=\frac{100^2}{9.545\times10^5}$$
$$\boxed{L_L=10.48\ \text{mH}}$$
Part (d) — mutual inductance. The same flux $\phi$ (driven entirely by the left winding) links every one of the right winding's turns, since both sit on the one shared loop:
$$M=\frac{N_LN_R}{R_{\text{tot}}}=\frac{(100)(10)}{9.545\times10^5}$$
$$\boxed{M=1.048\ \text{mH}}$$
(consistency check: $M=L_L\cdot N_R/N_L=10.48\times(10/100)=1.048$ mH, matching.)
Quantity
Result
MMF
$200$ A·t
$R_{\text{tot}}$
$9.545\times10^5$ A·t/Wb
Flux $\phi$
$2.095\times10^{-4}$ Wb
Gap flux density $B$
$69.8$ mT
Self inductance $L_L$
$10.48$ mH
Mutual inductance $M$
$1.048$ mH
Check: Figure 1 shows a single rectangular magnetic loop with two air gaps, not a three-limb "E" core.