NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

20-Bio-A5 Systems Analysis & Control · Undated paper

Question 4 of 6: Aerobic Growth Stoichiometry — Yield and CO 2 Production

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

National Exams / EGBC — May 2019 — 04-Bio-A5 Enzyme and Microbial Kinetics. Three-hour open-book examination; any non-communicating calculator is permitted. Six questions constitute a complete paper (10 + 15 + 20 + 20 + 15 + 20 = 100 marks). Content spans a rapid-equilibrium mixed-inhibition mechanism, Lineweaver–Burk inhibitor-type determination from initial-rate data, external-mass-transfer-limited immobilized-enzyme kinetics on a flat plate, aerobic-growth stoichiometry with an elemental-balance yield calculation, logistic growth-associated product-formation kinetics in a batch fermenter, and continuous tubular-sterilizer design (vitamin retention and probability of successful sterilization).

Reference texts: Bailey & Ollis, Biochemical Engineering Fundamentals (2nd ed.) — enzyme inhibition mechanisms and kinetics (Ch. 3), immobilized-enzyme diffusion-reaction (Ch. 8), stoichiometry and yields (Ch. 6), unstructured growth/product kinetics (Ch. 7), and batch sterilization design (Ch. 9). All quantities are used exactly as printed on the exam.

Check — four points were resolved before authoring: (1) the printed marking scheme lists six separate questions (10, 15, 15+5, 15+5, 15, 10+10 marks) — Questions 1 and 2 are separate questions, treated as such here to match the marking scheme exactly. (2) Question 1 asks for the “rapid equilibrium approach,” not the QSSA. (3) Question 2’s data table has four rows, not three — including the row I = 0, S = 0.02, V = 0.9 mmol/(mL·min), which is essential (it is the only other no-inhibitor point). (4) Question 6’s printed sub-parts really are only “b)” and “c)” — part “a)” is genuinely absent from the paper; the marking scheme’s (a) 10 marks / (b) 10 marks are mapped onto the two printed sub-parts b) and c) respectively.

Question 4: Aerobic Growth Stoichiometry — Yield and CO2 Production (a. 15 marks; b. 5 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given.

QuantityValue
Glucose supplied initially15 mmol
Dry cell weight formed0.32 g
Biomass molecular weight25.2 g/mol (CH$_{1.6}$N$_{0.20}$O$_{0.55}$)
O$_2$ consumed16 mmol
NH$_3$, O$_2$ suppliedin excess

Find. (a) $Y_{X/S}$ (g DCW/mol glucose consumed) and the glucose remaining in the medium; (b) the CO$_2$ produced.

Approach. The reaction as written has four elemental balances (C, H, N, O) but five unknown coefficients ($a,b,c,d,e$); the measured $O_2$-consumed/biomass-formed ratio supplies the missing (fifth) equation, closing the stoichiometry so every coefficient — and hence glucose consumed — can be solved for explicitly.

  1. Moles of biomass formed. $$n_X=\frac{0.32\ \text{g}}{25.2\ \text{g/mol}}=0.012698\ \text{mol}=12.698\ \text{mmol}.$$
  2. Elemental balances (per mol glucose reacted, coefficients $a,b,c,d,e$). $$\text{C: }6=c+d,\quad \text{N: }b=0.2c,\quad \text{H: }12+3b=1.6c+2e,\quad \text{O: }6+2a=0.55c+2d+e.$$ Solving H and O in terms of $c$: $e=6-0.5c$ and $a=6-0.975c$.
  3. Close the system with the measured ratio. Since $O_2$ consumed $=a\xi$ and biomass formed $=c\xi$ for extent of reaction $\xi$ (mmol glucose reacted), $$\frac{a}{c}=\frac{n_{O_2}}{n_X}=\frac{16}{12.698}=1.2600.$$ Combined with $a=6-0.975c$: $$1.2600c=6-0.975c\ \Rightarrow\ c=\frac{6}{1.2600+0.975}=2.6846.$$
  4. Back-solve all coefficients. $$b=0.2(2.6846)=0.5369,\quad d=6-2.6846=3.3154,\quad e=6-0.5(2.6846)=4.6577,\quad a=1.2600(2.6846)=3.3826.$$ (All four elemental balances check to within rounding.)
  5. (a) Glucose consumed and $Y_{X/S}$. Extent of reaction from the $O_2$ balance: $$\xi=\frac{n_{O_2}}{a}=\frac{16}{3.3826}=4.7302\ \text{mmol glucose consumed}.$$ $$Y_{X/S}=\frac{X_{\text{formed}}}{\xi}=\frac{0.32\ \text{g}}{4.7302\times10^{-3}\ \text{mol}}=\boxed{67.65\ \text{g DCW/mol glucose}}.$$ Glucose remaining: $$S_{\text{final}}=15-4.7302=\boxed{10.27\ \text{mmol}}.$$
  6. (b) CO$_2$ produced. $$n_{CO_2}=d\,\xi=3.3154(4.7302\times10^{-3}\ \text{mol})=\boxed{15.68\ \text{mmol}}.$$
ResultValue
Stoichiometric coefficients$a$=3.383, $b$=0.537, $c$=2.685, $d$=3.315, $e$=4.658
Glucose consumed4.730 mmol
(a) $Y_{X/S}$67.65 g DCW/mol glucose
(a) Glucose remaining10.27 mmol
(b) CO$_2$ produced15.68 mmol
Check: assumes ALL biomass formed and O$_2$ consumed at the sampling instant is attributable to the reaction above (negligible inoculum, as stated), and that the C/H/N/O elemental balances close exactly with the ideal biomass formula CH$_{1.6}$N$_{0.20}$O$_{0.55}$ (its molecular weight, $12+1.6+0.2(14)+0.55(16)=25.2$ g/mol, matches the given 25.2 exactly, confirming the formula is used consistently).