20-Bio-A5 Systems Analysis & Control · Undated paper
Question 4 of 6: Aerobic Growth Stoichiometry — Yield and CO 2 Production
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
National Exams / EGBC — May 2019 — 04-Bio-A5 Enzyme and Microbial Kinetics. Three-hour open-book examination; any non-communicating calculator is permitted. Six questions constitute a complete paper (10 + 15 + 20 + 20 + 15 + 20 = 100 marks). Content spans a rapid-equilibrium mixed-inhibition mechanism, Lineweaver–Burk inhibitor-type determination from initial-rate data, external-mass-transfer-limited immobilized-enzyme kinetics on a flat plate, aerobic-growth stoichiometry with an elemental-balance yield calculation, logistic growth-associated product-formation kinetics in a batch fermenter, and continuous tubular-sterilizer design (vitamin retention and probability of successful sterilization).
Reference texts: Bailey & Ollis, Biochemical Engineering Fundamentals (2nd ed.) — enzyme inhibition mechanisms and kinetics (Ch. 3), immobilized-enzyme diffusion-reaction (Ch. 8), stoichiometry and yields (Ch. 6), unstructured growth/product kinetics (Ch. 7), and batch sterilization design (Ch. 9). All quantities are used exactly as printed on the exam.
Check — four points were resolved before authoring: (1) the printed marking scheme lists six separate questions (10, 15, 15+5, 15+5, 15, 10+10 marks) — Questions 1 and 2 are separate questions, treated as such here to match the marking scheme exactly. (2) Question 1 asks for the “rapid equilibrium approach,” not the QSSA. (3) Question 2’s data table has four rows, not three — including the row I = 0, S = 0.02, V = 0.9 mmol/(mL·min), which is essential (it is the only other no-inhibitor point). (4) Question 6’s printed sub-parts really are only “b)” and “c)” — part “a)” is genuinely absent from the paper; the marking scheme’s (a) 10 marks / (b) 10 marks are mapped onto the two printed sub-parts b) and c) respectively.
Question 4: Aerobic Growth Stoichiometry — Yield and CO2 Production (a. 15 marks; b. 5 marks)
Find. (a) $Y_{X/S}$ (g DCW/mol glucose consumed) and the glucose remaining in the medium; (b) the CO$_2$ produced.
Approach. The reaction as written has four elemental balances (C, H, N, O) but five unknown coefficients ($a,b,c,d,e$); the measured $O_2$-consumed/biomass-formed ratio supplies the missing (fifth) equation, closing the stoichiometry so every coefficient — and hence glucose consumed — can be solved for explicitly.
Moles of biomass formed. $$n_X=\frac{0.32\ \text{g}}{25.2\ \text{g/mol}}=0.012698\ \text{mol}=12.698\ \text{mmol}.$$
Elemental balances (per mol glucose reacted, coefficients $a,b,c,d,e$). $$\text{C: }6=c+d,\quad \text{N: }b=0.2c,\quad \text{H: }12+3b=1.6c+2e,\quad \text{O: }6+2a=0.55c+2d+e.$$ Solving H and O in terms of $c$: $e=6-0.5c$ and $a=6-0.975c$.
Close the system with the measured ratio. Since $O_2$ consumed $=a\xi$ and biomass formed $=c\xi$ for extent of reaction $\xi$ (mmol glucose reacted), $$\frac{a}{c}=\frac{n_{O_2}}{n_X}=\frac{16}{12.698}=1.2600.$$ Combined with $a=6-0.975c$: $$1.2600c=6-0.975c\ \Rightarrow\ c=\frac{6}{1.2600+0.975}=2.6846.$$
Back-solve all coefficients. $$b=0.2(2.6846)=0.5369,\quad d=6-2.6846=3.3154,\quad e=6-0.5(2.6846)=4.6577,\quad a=1.2600(2.6846)=3.3826.$$ (All four elemental balances check to within rounding.)
(a) Glucose consumed and $Y_{X/S}$. Extent of reaction from the $O_2$ balance: $$\xi=\frac{n_{O_2}}{a}=\frac{16}{3.3826}=4.7302\ \text{mmol glucose consumed}.$$ $$Y_{X/S}=\frac{X_{\text{formed}}}{\xi}=\frac{0.32\ \text{g}}{4.7302\times10^{-3}\ \text{mol}}=\boxed{67.65\ \text{g DCW/mol glucose}}.$$ Glucose remaining: $$S_{\text{final}}=15-4.7302=\boxed{10.27\ \text{mmol}}.$$
Check: assumes ALL biomass formed and O$_2$ consumed at the sampling instant is attributable to the reaction above (negligible inoculum, as stated), and that the C/H/N/O elemental balances close exactly with the ideal biomass formula CH$_{1.6}$N$_{0.20}$O$_{0.55}$ (its molecular weight, $12+1.6+0.2(14)+0.55(16)=25.2$ g/mol, matches the given 25.2 exactly, confirming the formula is used consistently).