24-Bld-A6 Geotechnical Materials and Analysis · Undated paper
Question 6 of 7
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
07-BLD-A6 Geotechnical Materials and Analysis, National Examinations (printed exam date May 2019). 3 hours, closed book, 100 marks. Section A (Q1–Q3) is compulsory (40 marks); Section B directs "answer any three of Q4–Q7" (60 marks), but for completeness this solution answers all four.
Reference texts: B.M. Das, Principles of Geotechnical Engineering, 9th ed.; B.M. Das, Principles of Foundation Engineering, 9th ed.
Approach. The deviator stress is unaffected by pore pressure ($\sigma_1'-\sigma_3'=\sigma_1-\sigma_3$), so combine that fact with the effective-stress Mohr–Coulomb failure criterion (in terms of $\sigma_3'$) to solve for $\sigma_3'$, then recover $u$ from the known total stress.
Effective-stress failure criterion. $\sigma_1'=\sigma_3'\tan^2\!\left(45+\frac{\phi'}{2}\right)+2c'\tan\!\left(45+\frac{\phi'}{2}\right)$. With $\phi'=30^\circ$: $\tan(60^\circ)=1.732$, so $K_p=\tan^2(60^\circ)=3.00$.
Use the (pore-pressure-independent) deviator stress. $\sigma_1'-\sigma_3'=180$, so $\sigma_1'=\sigma_3'+180$. Substituting into the failure criterion: $\sigma_3'+180=3.00\,\sigma_3'+2(20)(1.732)$, i.e. $\sigma_3'+180=3.00\,\sigma_3'+69.28$.
Solve for $\sigma_3'$. $180-69.28=2.00\,\sigma_3' \Rightarrow \sigma_3'=55.36\text{ kN/m}^2$, and $\sigma_1'=55.36+180=235.36\text{ kN/m}^2$.
(ii) Answer: NO. A UU test is sheared with no drainage permitted at any stage, so the sample's water content — and hence its undrained shear strength $c_u$ (with $\phi_u\approx0$ for a saturated clay) — stays fixed at whatever it was in the field at the time of sampling. That total-stress strength is only representative of short-term, end-of-construction conditions, when field pore pressures have not yet had time to change. An earthen structure's long-term stability, by contrast, is governed by conditions once excess pore pressures have fully dissipated (or built up to a new steady-state seepage condition) — which requires the effective-stress strength parameters $c',\phi'$ from a CU test (with pore-pressure measurement) or a CD test, not the UU test's total-stress $c_u$. Using UU results for a long-term analysis risks a dangerously unconservative answer if the soil's long-term drained strength envelope is actually lower than the short-term undrained one predicts (a real risk for normally consolidated to lightly overconsolidated clays).