NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

23-Chem-A1 Process Balances and Chemical Thermodynamics · December 2016

Question 3 of 6: Heat of Reaction versus Temperature (Kirchhoff’s Law)

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

National Exams — December 2016 — 04-Chem-A1 Process Balances and Chemical Thermodynamics. Three-hour, open-book exam; any non-communicating calculator permitted. Format: two parts — Part A (Q1–Q3) Process Balances, Part B (Q4–Q6) Chemical Thermodynamics; the candidate answers two questions from each part (four constitute a complete paper, equal value). All six questions are solved below for completeness. Property data not printed on the paper (molar masses, critical constants, acentric factors, Rackett Zc) are stated explicitly in each Given block as open-book look-ups.

Reference texts: Felder, Rousseau & Bullard, Elementary Principles of Chemical Processes (4th ed., Wiley) — material balances, combustion/Orsat analysis, humidity; Himmelblau & Riggs, Basic Principles and Calculations in Chemical Engineering (8th ed.) — heats of reaction and Kirchhoff’s law; Smith, Van Ness, Abbott & Swihart, Introduction to Chemical Engineering Thermodynamics (8th ed., McGraw-Hill) — fugacity, generalized virial correlations, reaction equilibrium and VLE; supporting property data from Perry’s Chemical Engineers’ Handbook (9th ed.) and the NIST Chemistry WebBook.

Question 3: Heat of Reaction versus Temperature (Kirchhoff’s Law) (Part A — equal value)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given. $\Delta H^\circ_R(298\ \text{K}) = -21.59$ kcal/mol. Heat-capacity coefficients (the printed units read “kcal/mol·K”, but the magnitude of $a\approx29$ shows these are in J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹):

Component$a$$b\times10^{3}$$c\times10^{6}$$d\times10^{9}$
CO29.03−2.8211.64−4.71
H₂28.611.02−0.150.77
CH₃OH21.1470.8425.87−28.50

Find. $\Delta H_R(T)$ as an explicit polynomial in $T$.

Approach. Form $\Delta C_p = C_{p,\text{CH}_3\text{OH}}-C_{p,\text{CO}}-2\,C_{p,\text{H}_2}$, integrate Kirchhoff’s equation $\text{d}(\Delta H)/\text{d}T=\Delta C_p$, and fix the integration constant $\Delta H_0$ from the 298 K datum (after converting kcal to J).

  1. Coefficient differences. With $\Delta\theta = \theta_{\text{CH}_3\text{OH}}-\theta_{\text{CO}}-2\theta_{\text{H}_2}$ for each of $a,b,c,d$: $$\Delta a=-65.11,\quad \Delta b=71.62\times10^{-3},\quad \Delta c=14.53\times10^{-6},\quad \Delta d=-25.33\times10^{-9}.$$
  2. Convert the datum to joules. This is the step that most often goes wrong: the $C_p$’s are in J, so $$\Delta H^\circ_R(298.15)=-21.59\ \text{kcal/mol}\times4184\ \tfrac{\text{J}}{\text{kcal}}=-90{,}333\ \text{J/mol}.$$
  3. Integrate Kirchhoff’s law. $\displaystyle \Delta H_R(T)=\Delta H_0+\Delta a\,T+\tfrac{\Delta b}{2}T^2+\tfrac{\Delta c}{3}T^3+\tfrac{\Delta d}{4}T^4.$ Evaluating the polynomial part at 298.15 K gives $-16{,}151$ J, so $$\Delta H_0=-90{,}333-(-16{,}151)=\boxed{-74{,}182\ \text{J/mol}}.$$
  4. Empirical equation. Substituting the constants (with $T$ in K, $\Delta H_R$ in J/mol): $$\boxed{\;\Delta H_R(T)=-74{,}182-65.11\,T+0.03581\,T^2+4.843\times10^{-6}\,T^3-6.333\times10^{-9}\,T^4\;}$$
  5. Check. At 298.15 K it returns $-90{,}333$ J $=-21.59$ kcal ✓. As a sample, at 500 K it gives $-97{,}574$ J/mol $=-23.32$ kcal/mol (the reaction becomes slightly more exothermic as $T$ rises, since $\Delta C_p<0$).
QuantityResult
$\Delta H_0$ (integration constant)−74,182 J/mol
$\Delta H_R(T)$−74182 − 65.11$T$ + 0.03581$T^2$ + 4.843e−6$T^3$ − 6.333e−9$T^4$ (J/mol)
Check: $\Delta H_R(500\,\text{K})$−23.32 kcal/mol