NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

23-Chem-A2 Unit Operations and Separation Processes · May 2018

Question 4 of 6: Diameter and Pressure Drop of a Packed Absorption Tower

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

Paper format. 16-CHEM-A2, Unit Operations and Separation Processes — May 2018, 3-hour open-book exam. Six 25-point problems: Part A (Unit Operations) — A1 filter-cake washing, A2 pipe flow & pump power, A3 free-settling of a particle; Part B (Separation Processes) — B1 packed-tower flooding/diameter, B2 adsorption isotherms, B3 multistage liquid–liquid extraction. The rubric asks for two problems per part; all six are worked in full below.

Reference texts (subject). McCabe, Smith & Harriott, Unit Operations of Chemical Engineering (7th ed.); Geankoplis, Transport Processes and Separation Process Principles (4th ed.); Treybal, Mass-Transfer Operations (3rd ed.); Perry's Chemical Engineers' Handbook (§6 fluid & particle mechanics, §14 packed towers, §15 extraction, §16 adsorption).

Question B1: Diameter and Pressure Drop of a Packed Absorption Tower (25 points)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given.

QuantityValue
Entering gas40 lbmol/hr, 5 mol% NH₃
Entering water3200 lbm/hr
NH₃ removal90%
$\rho_G$ (printed at 0 °C), $\rho_L$0.0791, 62.3 lbm/ft³
Packing factor $F$ / $\Phi$ / $\mu_L$155 / 1.0 / 1.0 cP
Operating point70% of flooding

Find. (a) tower diameter at 70% of flooding; (b) pressure drop per foot of packing.

Counter-current packed absorber 1-in Raschig rings water 3200 lbm/hr clean gas gas 40 lbmol/hr, 5% NH₃ rich liquor D = ?
Figure B1 — Loads are highest at the bottom (gas in, absorbed NH₃ added to liquid); the flooding correlation sizes the diameter for 70%-of-flooding gas flux there.

Approach. Evaluate the gas and liquid mass rates at the bottom, form the Sherwood flow-parameter abscissa, read the flooding-line ordinate, solve for the flooding gas mass flux, de-rate to 70% and size the area/diameter; the operating pressure drop follows from the $(G')^2$-scaled ordinate on the generalised chart.

  1. Bottom mass rates. Entering gas: 2 lbmol/hr NH₃ + 38 lbmol/hr air $\Rightarrow G=38(29)+2(17)=\boxed{1136\ \text{lbm/hr}}$. Absorbing 90% of 2 lbmol NH₃ adds $1.8(17)=30.6$ lbm/hr to the liquid: $L=3200+30.6=3230.6\ \text{lbm/hr}$.
  2. Gas density at 20 °C, then the flow-parameter abscissa. The printed 0.0791 lbm/ft³ is exactly the 0 °C value for this mixture ($M=0.95(29)+0.05(17)=28.4$, and $28.4/359=0.0791$). The tower runs at 20 °C, so $\rho_G=0.0791(273.15/293.15)=0.0737\ \text{lbm/ft}^3$. Then $$X=\frac{L}{G}\sqrt{\frac{\rho_G}{\rho_L}}=\frac{3230.6}{1136}\sqrt{\frac{0.0737}{62.3}}=\boxed{0.098}.$$
  3. Read flooding, solve for gas flux. On the supplied chart the vertical gridline just right of the one labelled 0.1 is the true $X=0.1$ line; check it against the 0.01 and 1.0 gridlines. At $X=0.098$ the flooding line reads $Y_\text{flood}\approx0.134$, whereas 0.19 is its value near $X\approx0.045$. With $Y=\dfrac{(G')^2F\Phi\mu_L^{0.1}}{\rho_G\rho_L g_c}$ and $\mu_L^{0.1}=1$: $$G'_\text{flood}=\sqrt{\frac{0.134(0.0737)(62.3)(32.174)}{155(1)(1)}}=0.357\ \text{lbm/ft}^2\text{s}.$$
  4. (a) Area and diameter at 70% of flooding. $G'_\text{op}=0.70(0.357)=0.250\ \text{lbm/ft}^2\text{s}$; with $G=1136/3600=0.3156\ \text{lbm/s}$: $$A=\frac{G}{G'_\text{op}}=1.26\ \text{ft}^2\ \Rightarrow\ D=\sqrt{\tfrac{4A}{\pi}}=\boxed{1.27\ \text{ft}\ (0.386\ \text{m})}.$$ Using the printed 0 °C density without correction gives $D\approx1.25$ ft, so the temperature correction moves the answer by under 2%.
  5. (b) Pressure drop. The ordinate scales with $(G')^2$, so $Y_\text{op}=(0.70)^2(0.134)=0.066$. At $X=0.098$ the 0.50-in curve sits at $Y\approx0.050$ and the 1.00-in curve at $Y\approx0.074$. The operating point falls between them, about 70% of the way up on the log scale: $$\boxed{\Delta P/Z\approx0.8\ \text{in H}_2\text{O per ft}\ (\approx0.66\ \text{kPa/m})}.$$ That is above the 0.25–0.5 in/ft usually preferred for absorbers, which is typical of a design at 70% of flooding. A 60% design would bring it down to about 0.5 in/ft.
QuantityValue
Gas / liquid mass rate (bottom)1136 / 3231 lbm/hr
Flow parameter $X$ ($\rho_G$ at 20 °C)0.098
Flooding ordinate / gas flux $G'_\text{flood}$0.134 / 0.357 lbm/ft²·s
(a) Tower diameter (70% flood)1.27 ft (0.386 m)
(b) Pressure drop per foot≈0.8 in H₂O/ft (≈0.66 kPa/m)
Check: both the flooding ordinate (0.134) and the operating pressure drop (0.8 in H₂O/ft) are chart reads. They were taken from the printed figure of the supplied figure, with log positions set from the gridlines. A ±5% error in the ordinate moves $D$ by only about ±1.3%, because $D\propto Y_\text{flood}^{-1/4}$. The rotated tick labels on this chart sit slightly left of their gridlines, so confirm the $X$ position before reading.