23-Chem-A2 Unit Operations and Separation Processes · May 2018
Question 4 of 6: Diameter and Pressure Drop of a Packed Absorption Tower
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. 16-CHEM-A2, Unit Operations and Separation Processes — May 2018, 3-hour open-book exam. Six 25-point problems: Part A (Unit Operations) — A1 filter-cake washing, A2 pipe flow & pump power, A3 free-settling of a particle; Part B (Separation Processes) — B1 packed-tower flooding/diameter, B2 adsorption isotherms, B3 multistage liquid–liquid extraction. The rubric asks for two problems per part; all six are worked in full below.
Reference texts (subject). McCabe, Smith & Harriott, Unit Operations of Chemical Engineering (7th ed.); Geankoplis, Transport Processes and Separation Process Principles (4th ed.); Treybal, Mass-Transfer Operations (3rd ed.); Perry's Chemical Engineers' Handbook (§6 fluid & particle mechanics, §14 packed towers, §15 extraction, §16 adsorption).
Question B1: Diameter and Pressure Drop of a Packed Absorption Tower (25 points)
Find. (a) tower diameter at 70% of flooding; (b) pressure drop per foot of packing.
Figure B1 — Loads are highest at the bottom (gas in, absorbed NH₃ added to liquid); the flooding correlation sizes the diameter for 70%-of-flooding gas flux there.
Approach. Evaluate the gas and liquid mass rates at the bottom, form the Sherwood flow-parameter abscissa, read the flooding-line ordinate, solve for the flooding gas mass flux, de-rate to 70% and size the area/diameter; the operating pressure drop follows from the $(G')^2$-scaled ordinate on the generalised chart.
Bottom mass rates. Entering gas: 2 lbmol/hr NH₃ + 38 lbmol/hr air $\Rightarrow G=38(29)+2(17)=\boxed{1136\ \text{lbm/hr}}$. Absorbing 90% of 2 lbmol NH₃ adds $1.8(17)=30.6$ lbm/hr to the liquid: $L=3200+30.6=3230.6\ \text{lbm/hr}$.
Gas density at 20 °C, then the flow-parameter abscissa. The printed 0.0791 lbm/ft³ is exactly the 0 °C value for this mixture ($M=0.95(29)+0.05(17)=28.4$, and $28.4/359=0.0791$). The tower runs at 20 °C, so $\rho_G=0.0791(273.15/293.15)=0.0737\ \text{lbm/ft}^3$. Then $$X=\frac{L}{G}\sqrt{\frac{\rho_G}{\rho_L}}=\frac{3230.6}{1136}\sqrt{\frac{0.0737}{62.3}}=\boxed{0.098}.$$
Read flooding, solve for gas flux. On the supplied chart the vertical gridline just right of the one labelled 0.1 is the true $X=0.1$ line; check it against the 0.01 and 1.0 gridlines. At $X=0.098$ the flooding line reads $Y_\text{flood}\approx0.134$, whereas 0.19 is its value near $X\approx0.045$. With $Y=\dfrac{(G')^2F\Phi\mu_L^{0.1}}{\rho_G\rho_L g_c}$ and $\mu_L^{0.1}=1$: $$G'_\text{flood}=\sqrt{\frac{0.134(0.0737)(62.3)(32.174)}{155(1)(1)}}=0.357\ \text{lbm/ft}^2\text{s}.$$
(a) Area and diameter at 70% of flooding. $G'_\text{op}=0.70(0.357)=0.250\ \text{lbm/ft}^2\text{s}$; with $G=1136/3600=0.3156\ \text{lbm/s}$: $$A=\frac{G}{G'_\text{op}}=1.26\ \text{ft}^2\ \Rightarrow\ D=\sqrt{\tfrac{4A}{\pi}}=\boxed{1.27\ \text{ft}\ (0.386\ \text{m})}.$$ Using the printed 0 °C density without correction gives $D\approx1.25$ ft, so the temperature correction moves the answer by under 2%.
(b) Pressure drop. The ordinate scales with $(G')^2$, so $Y_\text{op}=(0.70)^2(0.134)=0.066$. At $X=0.098$ the 0.50-in curve sits at $Y\approx0.050$ and the 1.00-in curve at $Y\approx0.074$. The operating point falls between them, about 70% of the way up on the log scale: $$\boxed{\Delta P/Z\approx0.8\ \text{in H}_2\text{O per ft}\ (\approx0.66\ \text{kPa/m})}.$$ That is above the 0.25–0.5 in/ft usually preferred for absorbers, which is typical of a design at 70% of flooding. A 60% design would bring it down to about 0.5 in/ft.
Quantity
Value
Gas / liquid mass rate (bottom)
1136 / 3231 lbm/hr
Flow parameter $X$ ($\rho_G$ at 20 °C)
0.098
Flooding ordinate / gas flux $G'_\text{flood}$
0.134 / 0.357 lbm/ft²·s
(a) Tower diameter (70% flood)
1.27 ft (0.386 m)
(b) Pressure drop per foot
≈0.8 in H₂O/ft (≈0.66 kPa/m)
Check: both the flooding ordinate (0.134) and the operating pressure drop (0.8 in H₂O/ft) are chart reads. They were taken from the printed figure of the supplied figure, with log positions set from the gridlines. A ±5% error in the ordinate moves $D$ by only about ±1.3%, because $D\propto Y_\text{flood}^{-1/4}$. The rotated tick labels on this chart sit slightly left of their gridlines, so confirm the $X$ position before reading.