NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

23-Chem-A3 Heat and Mass Transfer · May 2014

Question 5 of 7: Height of a Cyanogen Absorption Column

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

National Exams — May 2014 — 04-Chem-A3 Mass Transfer Operations. Three-hour, open-book exam; any non-communicating calculator permitted. Format: seven questions in three parts — answer one of Q1–Q2 (Part A), one of Q3–Q4 (Part B) and two of Q5–Q7 (Part C); four questions of equal value constitute a complete paper. All seven are solved below for completeness. Property data (diffusivities, vapour pressures, psychrometric enthalpies) are stated in each Given block; the psychrometric appendix supplied with the exam furnishes the saturated-air data used in Q6.

Reference texts: Geankoplis, Transport Processes and Separation Process Principles (4th ed., Prentice Hall) — molecular diffusion, convective mass transfer, absorption and humidification; Treybal, Mass-Transfer Operations (3rd ed., McGraw-Hill) — gas absorption, wetted-wall and cooling-tower design; Welty, Wicks, Wilson & Rorrer, Fundamentals of Momentum, Heat and Mass Transfer — boundary-layer and falling-sphere correlations; supporting property/psychrometric data from Perry's Chemical Engineers' Handbook (9th ed.).

Question 5: Height of a Cyanogen Absorption Column (equal value)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given. A dilute packed absorber with individual gas- and liquid-film coefficients and a curved equilibrium line, so the local slope (and hence the overall coefficient) changes up the column.

QuantityValue
$k^{\prime}_ya$ / $k^{\prime}_xa$312 / 1800 kmol/m³·h
Equilibrium$y^*=5.3\,x^{1.07}$
$y_1$ (bottom) / $y_2$ (top)0.0125 / $75\times10^{-6}$
Inlet water $x_2$0
Gas $G$ / water $L$85 / 350 kmol/m²·h

Find. The packed height $z$.

liquid mole fraction xgas mole fraction yy* = 5.3 x^1.07bottom (1)top (2)operating linered: interface tie lines, slope −k_xa/k_ya
Figure 5 — The operating line (blue) lies above the convex equilibrium curve $y^*=5.3x^{1.07}$ (green). For each bulk point the interface composition is found along a tie line of slope $-k_xa/k_ya$ (red); the gas-film driving force is $y-y_i$.

Approach. Set the dilute operating line from the solute balance, then at each gas composition find the interface along a tie line of slope $-k^{\prime}_xa/k^{\prime}_ya$ (interface on the equilibrium curve), and integrate the gas-film transfer units $\int dy/(y-y_i)$; multiply by $H_G=G/k^{\prime}_ya$.

  1. Operating line. A dilute solute balance with $x_2=0$ gives $x = \dfrac{G}{L}(y-y_2) = 0.2429(y-y_2)$; at the bottom $x_1 = 0.2429(0.0125-7.5\times10^{-5}) = 0.00302.$
  2. Height of a gas-film transfer unit. $H_G = \dfrac{G}{k^{\prime}_ya} = \dfrac{85}{312} = \boxed{0.272\ \text{m}}$ (constant, since $k^{\prime}_ya$ is given).
  3. Interface compositions (curved equilibrium). At each $y$ the interface $(x_i,y_i)$ satisfies flux continuity $k^{\prime}_ya(y-y_i)=k^{\prime}_xa(x_i-x)$ with $y_i=5.3x_i^{1.07}$ — i.e. a tie line of slope $-k^{\prime}_xa/k^{\prime}_ya=-5.77$ from the operating point to the equilibrium curve. This is solved point-by-point.
  4. Number of gas-film transfer units. Integrating the gas-side driving force up the column, $$N_G = \int_{y_2}^{y_1}\frac{dy}{y-y_i} = 16.2,$$ the integrand peaking at the dilute (top) end where the 75 ppm target makes the driving force small.
  5. Packed height. $$z = H_G\,N_G = 0.272\times16.2 = \boxed{4.4\ \text{m}}.$$
QuantityResult
Bottom liquid $x_1$0.00302
$H_G=G/k^{\prime}_ya$0.272 m
Gas-film transfer units $N_G$16.2
Packed height $z$≈ 4.4 m
Check
Because the equilibrium line is curved, the overall coefficient $1/K^{\prime}_y=1/k^{\prime}_y+m/k^{\prime}_x$ uses the secant slope of the tie line, not the tangent $dy^*/dx$; substituting the tangent slope overstates the height (here by ~50%). The rigorous interface (tie-line) integration used above avoids that error.