Question 5 of 6: Part B: Mass-Transfer Coefficient in an Ammonia Scrubber, and by the Chilton–Colburn Analogy
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
National Exams — December 2017 — 16-Chem-A3 Heat and Mass Transfer. Three-hour, open-book exam (one textbook of the candidate’s choice; any non-communicating calculator). Format: two parts — Part A — Heat Transfer (Q1–Q3) and Part B — Mass Transfer (Q4–Q6). All problems are worth 25 points; the rubric requires at least two problems attempted from each part and marks only the first two per part, so a complete paper is four questions (100 points). All six problems are solved below for completeness. Property data are quoted as stated in each problem; where a value applies to a film condition it is used at the stated film temperature.
Reference texts: F. P. Incropera & D. P. DeWitt, Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer (Wiley) — free/forced convection correlations, conduction shape factors, the heat–mass-transfer analogy; J. P. Holman, Heat Transfer (McGraw-Hill) — natural-convection constants $C,m$ and cylinder conduction; R. E. Treybal, Mass-Transfer Operations (McGraw-Hill) — wetted-wall $k_G$, gas absorption and the Chilton–Colburn analogy; R. B. Bird, W. E. Stewart & E. N. Lightfoot, Transport Phenomena (Wiley); supporting property data from Perry’s Chemical Engineers’ Handbook (9th ed.).
Question 5 — Part B: Mass-Transfer Coefficient in an Ammonia Scrubber, and by the Chilton–Colburn Analogy (25 points)
Given. Gas enters at 20 mol/hr with $y_\text{in}=0.05$ NH₃ at $P=101.3$ kPa, 20 °C; 90% of the ammonia is absorbed into 2N H₂SO₄ that reacts so fast the interface partial pressure of NH₃ is essentially zero. The column is a wetted-wall tube, ID $=0.015$ m, $L=0.70$ m, so its transfer area is $A=\pi D L$.
Datum
Value
Gas rate / NH₃ fraction
20 mol/hr / 5%
Column ID / length
15 mm / 0.70 m
Diffusivity $D_{\text{NH}_3\text{-air}}$
$2.2\times10^{-5}$ m²/s
$Sc$ / $Pr$
0.67 / 0.70
Heat-transfer $h$ (part b)
75.2 kcal/hr·m²·°C
Find. (a) $k_G$ from the measured absorption; (b) $k_G$ predicted from the Chilton–Colburn analogy.
Figure 5 — Wetted-wall column: gas rises through the tube while 2N sulfuric acid films the wall. Because the acid neutralises ammonia instantly, the NH₃ partial pressure at the wall is ≈ 0, so the whole gas-film partial-pressure difference drives the transfer.
Approach. Convert the 90% absorption into a molar transfer rate, evaluate the log-mean NH₃ partial-pressure driving force (interface value zero), and divide by area to get $k_G$ for part (a). For part (b), set the Chilton–Colburn $j$-factors equal, $j_D=j_H$, to convert the heat-transfer coefficient into a mass-transfer coefficient.
Molar transfer rate. NH₃ entering is $0.05\times20=1.0$ mol/hr; 90% absorbed gives
$$N_A = 0.9\ \text{mol/hr} = 2.50\times10^{-4}\ \text{mol/s}.$$
The residual gas is 19 mol/hr air + 0.1 mol/hr NH₃, so the outlet fraction is $y_\text{out}=0.1/19.1=0.00524$.
Log-mean partial-pressure driving force. The bulk NH₃ partial pressures are $p_\text{in}=0.05(101.3)=5.07$ kPa and $p_\text{out}=0.00524(101.3)=0.530$ kPa; the wall value is zero at both ends, so
$$\Delta p_\text{lm}=\frac{p_\text{in}-p_\text{out}}{\ln(p_\text{in}/p_\text{out})}=\frac{5.07-0.530}{\ln(5.07/0.530)}=2.01\ \text{kPa}.$$
Mass-transfer coefficient (a). With column area $A=\pi(0.015)(0.70)=0.0330\ \text{m}^2$ and $N_A=k_G A\,\Delta p_\text{lm}$,
$$k_G = \frac{N_A}{A\,\Delta p_\text{lm}} = \frac{2.50\times10^{-4}}{(0.0330)(2.01)} = \boxed{3.8\times10^{-3}\ \text{mol}\,\text{m}^{-2}\text{s}^{-1}\text{kPa}^{-1}}.$$
As a sanity check this is a Sherwood number $Sh=k_c D/D_{AB}=6.3$ (with $k_c=k_G RT$), which is the right order for laminar wetted-wall flow. That is part (a).
Chilton–Colburn analogy (b). Equating the transfer $j$-factors, $j_D=j_H$, gives $k_c\,Sc^{2/3}=(h/\rho c_p)\,Pr^{2/3}$, so
$$k_c = \frac{h}{\rho c_p}\left(\frac{Pr}{Sc}\right)^{2/3}.$$
Converting $h=75.2$ kcal/hr·m²·°C $=87.4$ W/m²K, with air $\rho=1.204$ kg/m³ and $c_p=238\times4.184=996$ J/kg·K:
$$k_c=\frac{87.4}{(1.204)(996)}\left(\frac{0.70}{0.67}\right)^{2/3}=0.0751\ \text{m/s}.$$
Convert to $k_G$ (b). Since $N_A=k_c\,\Delta c=k_c\,\Delta p/(RT)$, we have $k_G=k_c/(RT)$:
$$k_G=\frac{0.0751}{(8.314)(293.15)}=3.08\times10^{-5}\ \text{mol}\,\text{m}^{-2}\text{s}^{-1}\text{Pa}^{-1}=\boxed{3.1\times10^{-2}\ \text{mol}\,\text{m}^{-2}\text{s}^{-1}\text{kPa}^{-1}}.$$
That is part (b).
The two estimates differ by roughly an order of magnitude. The absorption value (a) corresponds to $Sh\approx6$, entirely consistent with developing laminar flow in a short wetted-wall tube ($Re\approx760$); the analogy value (b) inherits the supplied $h$, which implies $Sh\approx51$ and therefore describes a much more vigorous (turbulent/entrance-enhanced) condition than the actual absorption run. Both are reported as computed; the discrepancy is the physical lesson — the Chilton–Colburn analogy is only as representative as the heat-transfer coefficient fed into it.