NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

23-Chem-A4 Chemical Reactor Engineering · December 2013

Question 1 of 5: Two CSTRs in Series (Bimolecular Liquid Reaction)

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

Paper format: Five questions, each 20 marks; any four constitute a complete paper (answer all five here). Open book, 3 hours, non-programmable calculator. Examiner asks that the origin of significant formulas be cited (e.g. Fogler).

Reference texts: H. S. Fogler, Elements of Chemical Reaction Engineering (5th ed., Prentice Hall) — CSTR/PFR design equations, multiple reactors, gas-phase variable-volume kinetics, adiabatic energy balance; O. Levenspiel, Chemical Reaction Engineering (3rd ed., Wiley) — reactor sizing and combinations; supporting data from Perry’s Chemical Engineers’ Handbook (9th ed.).

Question 1: Two CSTRs in Series (Bimolecular Liquid Reaction) (20 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given. Two feed streams (A and B) each 0.10 mol/L at 1.80 L/s combine at the inlet of reactor 1. Because A and B enter in equal molar amounts and are consumed 1:1, $C_A = C_B$ everywhere, so $(-r_A)=kC_A^2$. The liquid density is constant, so the volumetric flow is constant at $q = 3.60$ L/s throughout.

QuantityValue
Combined feed flow, $q$3.60 L/s
Inlet concentration, $C_{A0}=C_{B0}$0.050 mol/L
Reactor volumes $V_1,\ V_2$250 L, 2000 L
Rate constant, $k$0.65 L/(mol·s)

Find. (a) the conversion of A leaving reactor 1 and reactor 2; (b) whether reversing the reactor order raises or lowers the overall conversion, with justification.

CSTR 1250 LCSTR 22000 LFeed A0.1 M, 1.80 L/sFeed B0.1 M, 1.80 L/sX1 = 0.52ProductX2 = 0.86
Figure 1 — Two CSTRs in series. Equal streams of A and B mix to $C_{A0}=0.05$ M; the small tank precedes the large tank in the base case.

Approach. The inlet after mixing is 0.05 M (equal streams halve each concentration). Apply the CSTR mass balance $q(C_{in}-C_{out}) = V\,k\,C_{out}^2$ to each tank in turn, then compare the two orderings.

  1. Inlet concentration after mixing. Two equal 0.10 M streams combine, so each species is halved:$$C_{A0}=\frac{(0.10)(1.80)}{3.60}=0.050\ \text{mol/L},\qquad C_{A0}=C_{B0}\ \Rightarrow\ (-r_A)=kC_A^2.$$
  2. CSTR 1 balance (equimolar 2nd order). With $\tau_1=V_1/q=250/3.60=69.4$ s, the steady balance $C_{A0}-C_{A1}=\tau_1 k\,C_{A1}^2$ gives a quadratic $45.14\,C_{A1}^2+C_{A1}-0.050=0$:$$C_{A1}=\frac{-1+\sqrt{1+4(45.14)(0.050)}}{2(45.14)}=0.0240\ \text{mol/L}\;\Rightarrow\;X_1=1-\frac{0.0240}{0.050}=\boxed{0.52}.$$
  3. CSTR 2 balance. Reactor 2 receives $C_{A1}=0.0240$ M with $\tau_2=2000/3.60=555.6$ s, so $361.1\,C_{A2}^2+C_{A2}-0.0240=0$:$$C_{A2}=\frac{-1+\sqrt{1+4(361.1)(0.0240)}}{2(361.1)}=0.00689\ \text{mol/L}.$$
  4. Overall conversion. Referenced to the reactor-1 inlet:$$X_2=1-\frac{C_{A2}}{C_{A0}}=1-\frac{0.00689}{0.050}=\boxed{0.862\ (86.2\%)}.$$That is part (a): $X_1=52\%$ out of the small tank, $X_2=86\%$ out of the train.
  5. Part (b) — reverse the order (2000 L first, then 250 L). Repeating the two balances with the large tank first gives $C_A=0.01046$ M after tank 1 and $C_A=0.00775$ M after tank 2, i.e.$$X_{2,\text{rev}}=1-\frac{0.00775}{0.050}=0.845\ (84.5\%)\;\Rightarrow\;\boxed{\text{about 1.7 points LOWER}}.$$The reaction is second order ($n>1$), so its rate falls steeply as concentration drops. A CSTR runs entirely at its low exit concentration; putting the small tank first converts a useful amount while $C_A$ is still high (rate is high, so little volume is needed), leaving the large tank to grind down the now-dilute stream. Reversing wastes the big tank’s volume on an early, easy concentration drop and starves the small tank at low $C_A$ — hence the lower overall conversion.
QuantityResult
(a) Conversion out of reactor 1, $X_1$0.52 (52%)
(a) Overall conversion out of reactor 2, $X_2$0.862 (86.2%)
(b) Reversed-order overall conversion0.845 (84.5%) — lower by ≈1.7 pts
← Paper overview