NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

23-Chem-A4 Chemical Reactor Engineering · May 2013

Question 1 of 5: Diphosgene Decomposition — Order and Activation Energy

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

National Exams — May 2013 — 04-Chem-A4 Chemical Reactor Engineering. Three-hour, open-book exam; any non-communicating calculator permitted, Fogler’s Elements of Chemical Reaction Engineering allowed. Format: five questions, each 20 marks; any four constitute a complete paper (80 marks). All five are solved below for completeness. Per the paper’s instructions, all data are treated as exact and answers are given to three significant figures.

Reference texts: H. S. Fogler, Elements of Chemical Reaction Engineering (4th ed., Prentice Hall) — rate laws, batch/PFR/CSTR design equations, Arrhenius temperature dependence, integral & differential data analysis; O. Levenspiel, Chemical Reaction Engineering (3rd ed., Wiley) — reactor comparison and the tanks-in-series model; supporting thermochemical and property data from Perry’s Chemical Engineers’ Handbook (9th ed.).

Question 1: Diphosgene Decomposition — Order and Activation Energy (20 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given. Constant-volume, constant-temperature $(280\,{}^\circ\text{C})$ gas-phase batch reactor; $A\rightarrow 2B$ so total pressure rises as $A$ decomposes. Initial charge is pure $A$ at $P_{A0}=15$ torr.

QuantityValue
$t$ (s)0, 500, 800, 1300, 1800
$P_{tot}$ (torr)15, 18.9, 20.7, 23, 24.8
Initial diphosgene pressure $P_{A0}$15 torr
Second temperature265 °C ($k$ = ½ of the 280 °C value)

Find. (a) that the 2nd-order model fails; (b) that a 1st-order law fits; (c) the mean rate constant; (d) the activation energy $E_a$.

-901.563061.817022.061.1e+032.31.49e+032.551.89e+032.79time t (s)ln(P_A / torr)First-order test: ln P_A vs t
Figure 1 — First-order diagnostic for diphosgene decomposition. The points $\ln P_A$ vs $t$ fall on a straight line (slope $=-k$), confirming first-order kinetics.
-900.05663060.08587020.1151.1e+030.1441.49e+030.1731.89e+030.202time t (s)1 / P_A (torr⁻¹)Second-order test: 1/P_A vs t
Figure 2 — Second-order diagnostic. $1/P_A$ vs $t$ is visibly concave-up (the local slope keeps increasing), so the second-order model does not fit the data.

Approach. Convert total pressure to diphosgene partial pressure via the $A\rightarrow2B$ stoichiometry, then diagnose the order from which linearization is straight and obtain $E_a$ from the Arrhenius two-point relation.

  1. Relate the diphosgene partial pressure to total pressure. For the constant-volume, constant-temperature batch decomposition $A\rightarrow 2B$, each mole of $A$ that reacts produces two moles of $B$, so the moles (and pressure) rise by the extent of reaction. If $x$ (torr) of $A$ has decomposed, then $$P_{tot}=(P_{A0}-x)+2x = P_{A0}+x \;\Rightarrow\; P_A = P_{A0}-x = 2P_{A0}-P_{tot}.$$ With $P_{A0}=15$ torr this gives $P_A = \{15,\,11.1,\,9.3,\,7.0,\,5.2\}$ torr.
  2. (a) Second-order test — plot $1/P_A$ vs $t$. A second-order rate law $-\mathrm dP_A/\mathrm dt = k'P_A^2$ integrates to $1/P_A = 1/P_{A0}+k't$, a straight line. The data give $1/P_A = \{0.0667,\,0.0901,\,0.1075,\,0.1429,\,0.1923\}$ torr$^{-1}$; the successive slopes rise from $4.7\times10^{-5}$ to $9.9\times10^{-5}$ torr$^{-1}$s$^{-1}$ (Figure 2 is concave-up). Because the slope is not constant, $$\boxed{\text{the second-order model does not fit the data.}}$$
  3. (b) First-order differential test. Estimate the rate $-\mathrm dP_A/\mathrm dt$ by finite differences over each interval and evaluate it at the mean pressure of the interval; for a first-order law $-\mathrm dP_A/\mathrm dt=kP_A$ the ratio $k=(-\mathrm dP_A/\mathrm dt)/P_A$ should be constant: $$k = \frac{-\Delta P_A/\Delta t}{\bar P_A}=\{5.98,\,5.88,\,5.64,\,5.90\}\times10^{-4}\ \text{s}^{-1}.$$ The four values agree to within 6%, and equivalently $\ln P_A$ vs $t$ is a straight line (Figure 1). The data therefore obey a first-order rate law.
  4. (c) Mean rate constant. Averaging the differential values (and the slope of the $\ln P_A$–$t$ regression, $-k$, which gives the same figure): $$k = -\frac{\mathrm d(\ln P_A)}{\mathrm dt}=\boxed{5.86\times10^{-4}\ \text{s}^{-1}}\quad(\text{first order}).$$
  5. (d) Activation energy. Given $k(265\,{}^\circ\text{C})=\tfrac12\,k(280\,{}^\circ\text{C})$, apply the two-temperature Arrhenius relation with $T_1=553.15$ K, $T_2=538.15$ K: $$E_a = \frac{R\,\ln\!\big(k_1/k_2\big)}{\left(\tfrac1{T_2}-\tfrac1{T_1}\right)} =\frac{(8.314)\ln 2}{5.039\times10^{-5}}=1.14\times10^{5}\ \text{J/mol}=\boxed{114\ \text{kJ/mol}}.$$
QuantityResult
(a) Second-order fitFails — $1/P_A$ vs $t$ is curved
(b)–(c) Rate law & constantFirst order, $k = 5.86\times10^{-4}$ s$^{-1}$
(d) Activation energy$E_a = 114$ kJ/mol
← Paper overview