23-Chem-A4 Chemical Reactor Engineering · December 2016
Question 4 of 5: Fixed-Bed PFR — Catalyst Weight and Pore-Diffusion Effectiveness
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
National Exams / EGBC — December 2016 — 04-Chem-A4 Chemical Reactor Engineering. Three-hour open-book exam; one textbook of the candidate’s choice (Fogler or Levenspiel), personal unit-conversion / mathematical tables (CRC Handbook) and a non-communicating programmable calculator are permitted. Five questions are printed and any four constitute a complete paper (each worth 25 marks; Q1 and Q4 are split 5 / 12 / 8, Q5 is 9 / 5 / 11); all five are solved below for completeness. No credit is given for re-deriving standard rate expressions, so the batch / CSTR / PFR design equations are quoted and applied, and significant formulae are cited by origin as the rubric requests. Property look-ups not printed on the paper (the gas constant $R$) are stated explicitly in each Given block as permitted open-book references.
Reference texts: H. S. Fogler, Elements of Chemical Reaction Engineering (5th ed., Prentice Hall) — Levenspiel plots and the mixed-flow / plug-flow design equations (Ch. 2), the stoichiometric table (Ch. 3), adiabatic energy balances (Ch. 11–12), internal-diffusion effectiveness factors and the generalized Thiele modulus (Ch. 15), and residence-time distributions (Ch. 16–17). O. Levenspiel, Chemical Reaction Engineering (3rd ed., Wiley, 1999) — the "which reactor is better" rate-curve reasoning (Ch. 5–6) and pulse-tracer RTD analysis (Ch. 11–13).
Question 4: Fixed-Bed PFR — Catalyst Weight and Pore-Diffusion Effectiveness (25 marks: a 5, b 12, c 8)
Find. (a) intrinsic catalyst weight; (b) effectiveness factor at bed inlet and outlet; (c) actual catalyst weight with pore diffusion.
Hollow cylindrical (ring) catalyst pellet: outer diameter 2 cm, inner bore 1 cm, length 2 cm. The characteristic length for the Thiele modulus is $L_c = V_p/S_p$ (pellet volume ÷ external surface area).
Approach. Integrate the second-order PFR catalyst-weight balance for part (a); build the generalized Thiele modulus from the ring’s $L_c=V_p/S_p$ for part (b); and, recognising strong pore diffusion collapses the apparent order to $3/2$, re-integrate for part (c).
Part (b) — effectiveness factor at inlet and outlet
Characteristic length of the ring. With $R_o=0.01$ m, $R_i=0.005$ m, $L=0.02$ m: pellet volume $V_p=\pi(R_o^2-R_i^2)L = 4.71\times10^{-6}$ m$^3$; external surface (outer + inner walls + two annular faces) $S_p = 2\pi R_o L + 2\pi R_i L + 2\pi(R_o^2-R_i^2) = 2.36\times10^{-3}$ m$^2$. Hence $$L_c = V_p/S_p = 2.0\times10^{-3}\ \text{m} = 2\ \text{mm}.$$
Volumetric rate constant. Converting the per-mass constant, $k_v = k\rho_p = (2.5\times10^{-3})(3000) = 7.5$ m$^3$/(mol·s), so the intrinsic rate per unit pellet volume is $k_v C_A^2$.
Generalized Thiele modulus (second order). $\phi = L_c\sqrt{\dfrac{n+1}{2}\dfrac{k_v C_A}{D_e}}$ with $n=2$. At the bed inlet $C_A=12$ mol/m$^3$: $\phi_{\text{in}} = 2\times10^{-3}\sqrt{1.5(7.5)(12)/10^{-7}} = 73.5$. At the outlet $C_A=C_{A0}(1-0.9)=1.2$ mol/m$^3$: $\phi_{\text{out}} = 23.2$.
Effectiveness factors. For these large moduli the slab result $\eta=\tanh\phi/\phi \approx 1/\phi$ applies: $$\boxed{\eta_{\text{inlet}} \approx 0.014,\qquad \eta_{\text{outlet}} \approx 0.043}.$$ Both are far below unity — the pellet is severely pore-diffusion limited, and the limitation eases toward the outlet only because $C_A$ (and hence $\phi$) has fallen.
Part (c) — catalyst weight with pore diffusion
Apparent kinetics under strong diffusion. In the asymptotic regime $\eta=1/\phi \propto C_A^{-1/2}$, so the observed rate is $\eta k C_A^2 = (k/a)\,C_A^{3/2}$ with $a=L_c\sqrt{1.5\,k_v/D_e}=21.2\ (\text{m}^3/\text{mol})^{1/2}$. Pore diffusion turns the true 2nd-order reaction into an apparent $3/2$-order one.
Interpret. Internal diffusion inflates the required bed roughly $35\times$ (from 150 kg to $\sim$5300 kg). The rings are simply too large; crushing them to smaller $L_c$ (or using a higher-porosity support to raise $D_e$) would recover most of the intrinsic activity.