23-Chem-A4 Chemical Reactor Engineering · May 2018
Question 4 of 5: Two Adiabatic CSTRs in Series — Annual Production of B
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
National Exams / EGBC — May 2018 — 16-Chem-A4 Chemical Reactor Engineering. Three-hour open-book exam; one textbook of the candidate’s choice (Fogler or Levenspiel), unit-conversion / mathematical tables (CRC Handbook) and a non-communicating programmable calculator are permitted. Five questions are printed and any four constitute a complete paper (each worth 25 marks); all five are solved below for completeness. No credit is given for re-deriving standard rate expressions, so the batch / CSTR / PFR / packed-bed design equations are quoted (with their source) and applied. Property look-ups not printed on the paper (the gas constant, molar volumes, unit conversions) are stated explicitly in each Given block as permitted open-book references.
Reference texts: H. S. Fogler, Elements of Chemical Reaction Engineering (4th/5th ed., Prentice Hall) — batch/CSTR/PFR design equations, the stoichiometric table with expansion factor $\varepsilon$ for gas-phase reactions with a change in moles, packed-bed (catalyst-weight) mole balances, and the adiabatic CSTR energy balance and multiplicity of steady states; O. Levenspiel, Chemical Reaction Engineering (3rd ed., Wiley) — reactors in series for $>$1-order kinetics and batch turnaround; supporting property data from Perry’s Chemical Engineers’ Handbook (9th ed.).
Question 4: Two Adiabatic CSTRs in Series — Annual Production of B (25 marks)
Given. Liquid-phase first-order reaction in two equal adiabatic CSTRs in series; the exothermic heat release raises the temperature, which in turn accelerates the reaction.
Quantity
Value
Annual feed of A
$2.1\times10^6$ lb/yr over 7000 hr/yr
Reactor volume (each)
1000 gal $\times$ 2 (series)
Feed temperature $T_0$
20 °C $=293.15$ K
Density $\rho_A$
7.5 lb/gal
Heat of reaction $\Delta H_{rxn}$
$-83$ cal/g
Heat capacity $C_p$
0.5 cal·g$^{-1}$·°C$^{-1}$
Find. The mass of B produced per year.
Figure 4 — Two equal adiabatic CSTRs in series. Cold feed enters reactor 1; because no heat is removed, the temperature climbs with conversion, so reactor 2 runs hotter and finishes the conversion.
Approach. The adiabatic energy balance ties temperature to conversion ($T=T_0+\Delta T_{ad}X$); solve each CSTR mole balance together with that relation, taking the ignited (upper) steady state as the operating point.
Feed rate and residence time. $\dot m=\dfrac{2.1\times10^6}{7000}=300\ \text{lb/hr};$ $v_0=300/7.5=40\ \text{gal/hr},$ so each reactor has $\tau=\dfrac{1000}{40}=25\ \text{hr}.$
Adiabatic temperature rise. Per unit mass, $\Delta T_{ad}=\dfrac{-\Delta H_{rxn}}{C_p}=\dfrac{83}{0.5}=166\ \text{°C}$ at complete conversion, so along the reactors $T=293.15+166\,X\ \text{(K)}.$
Reactor 1 (mole + energy balance). The first-order CSTR gives $k\tau=\dfrac{X_1}{1-X_1}$ with $k$ evaluated at $T_1=293.15+166X_1.$ This nonlinear pair has three roots (see the note below); the reactor operates on the upper, ignited branch: $$\boxed{X_1=0.990,\quad T_1=457\ \text{K}\ (184\ \text{°C}).}$$ The long residence time ($\tau=25$ hr) means that once hot, $k\tau\approx96$, so a single tank already reaches 99% conversion.
Reactor 2 (polishing). $\tau=\dfrac{X_2-X_1}{k(T_2)(1-X_2)}$ with $T_2=293.15+166X_2$ carries the conversion to $$\boxed{X_2=0.9999,\quad T_2=459\ \text{K}\ (186\ \text{°C}).}$$ The very high boiling points quoted confirm both streams stay liquid at 186 °C.
Production of B. Since $A\rightarrow B$ conserves mass, the B produced equals the A converted: $$\dot m_B=X_2\times2.1\times10^6=\boxed{2.10\times10^{6}\ \text{lb/yr}\ (\approx300\ \text{lb/hr}).}$$
Check — multiplicity of steady states
The reactor-1 balance has three steady states: a quenched one ($X\approx0$, reactor near the 20 °C feed, reaction negligibly slow), an unstable middle one ($X\approx0.70$, which no reactor can hold), and the ignited stable one ($X\approx0.99$) reported here. Bracketing between the middle and quenched roots would wrongly return $X\approx0.70$; the operated design sits on the upper branch (reached by start-up pre-heating), which the high boiling points make thermally feasible.