NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

23-Chem-A6 Process Dynamics and Control · May 2017

Question 6 of 8: Second-Order ODE — Standard Form, Stability and Damping

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

National Exams / EGBC — May 2017 — 04-Chem-A6 Process Dynamics & Control. Three-hour open-book examination; any non-communicating calculator is permitted. Eight problems are printed and any five constitute a complete paper (each worth 20%); all eight are solved below for completeness. The paper is entirely quantitative — dynamic modelling, transfer functions, step/ramp responses, Routh and Nyquist stability, frequency-response (Bode) design and IMC — and qualitative sketches are drawn as real figures wherever the paper asks for them.

Reference texts: D. E. Seborg, T. F. Edgar, D. A. Mellichamp & F. J. Doyle III, Process Dynamics and Control (4th ed., Wiley) — Laplace-domain modelling, linearisation, transfer functions, feedback stability, frequency response and IMC design; G. Stephanopoulos, Chemical Process Control: An Introduction to Theory and Practice (Prentice Hall) — Routh test, Nyquist criterion and dead-time systems; D. R. Coughanowr & S. E. LeBlanc, Process Systems Analysis and Control (3rd ed., McGraw-Hill) — first-order thermal/level dynamics, step/ramp/pulse response and block-diagram algebra. Standard control conventions (deviation variables; unity valve/sensor gains unless stated) are used throughout.

Problem 6: Second-Order ODE — Standard Form, Stability and Damping (20%)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given. $\ddot y+k\dot y+10y=2x$.

Find. (a) standard-form $Y/X$; (b) $k$-ranges for stable / underdamped / overdamped; (c) underdamped $\tau$ and $\zeta$ vs $k$.

Approach. Transform and normalise the constant term to read $K,\tau,\zeta$ by inspection, then classify the poles of $s^2+ks+10$.

  1. (a) Standard form. $(s^2+ks+10)Y=2X$; divide by 10: $$\boxed{\dfrac{Y}{X}=\dfrac{0.2}{0.1s^2+0.1k\,s+1}=\dfrac{K}{\tau^2s^2+2\zeta\tau s+1}}$$ with $K=0.2$, $\tau^2=0.1\Rightarrow\tau=1/\sqrt{10}=0.316$, and $2\zeta\tau=0.1k$.
  2. (b) Regimes (poles of $s^2+ks+10=0$):
    • (i) Stable: both roots in LHP $\Rightarrow k>0$ (constant term $10>0$).
    • (ii) Underdamped: $\zeta<1\Rightarrow 0<k<2\sqrt{10}=6.32$.
    • (iii) Overdamped: $\zeta>1\Rightarrow k>2\sqrt{10}=6.32$ (critically damped exactly at $k=6.32$).
  3. (c) Underdamped $\tau$ and $\zeta$. $$\boxed{\tau=\frac{1}{\sqrt{10}}=0.316\ \text{(independent of }k),\qquad \zeta=\frac{k}{2\sqrt{10}}=0.158\,k.}$$ Only the damping ratio depends on $k$; the natural time constant is fixed by the $10y$ term. As $k$ rises from 0 to 6.32 the response moves from sustained oscillation toward critical damping.
0 1.2 2.4 3.6 4.8 6 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 k=2 (underdamped) k=6.32 (critical) k=12 (overdamped) time t y(t) P6: unit-step response vs damping (K=0.2, τ=0.316)
Problem 6: unit-step response family ($K=0.2$, $\tau=0.316$). Underdamped ($k=2$) overshoots and rings; critical ($k=6.32$) is the fastest non-oscillatory approach; overdamped ($k=12$) is sluggish. All share the same final value $0.2$.
QuantityValue
(a) $Y/X$$0.2/(0.1s^2+0.1ks+1)$; $K=0.2,\ \tau=0.316$
(b) Stable / underdamped / overdamped$k>0$ / $0<k<6.32$ / $k>6.32$
(c) $\tau,\ \zeta$$0.316$ (const), $0.158k$