23-Chem-A6 Process Dynamics and Control · December 2019
Question 7 of 8: Inverse Laplace Transforms and Time-Response Stability
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Reference texts: D. E. Seborg, T. F. Edgar, D. A. Mellichamp & F. J. Doyle III, Process Dynamics and Control (4th ed., Wiley) — Laplace-domain modelling, linearisation, transfer functions, feedback stability, frequency response and IMC design; G. Stephanopoulos, Chemical Process Control (Prentice Hall) — Routh test, Nyquist criterion and dead-time systems; D. R. Coughanowr & S. E. LeBlanc, Process Systems Analysis and Control (3rd ed., McGraw-Hill) — first-order thermal/level dynamics, step/ramp/pulse response and block-diagram algebra. Standard control conventions (deviation variables; unity valve/sensor gains unless stated) are used throughout. This sitting is an open-book paper of eight problems of which any five constitute a complete exam; all eight are solved here.
Problem 7: Inverse Laplace Transforms and Time-Response Stability (20%)
The two functions $Y(s)$ for Problem 7 used below are assumed. They are of the type this question tests: a proper rational $Y(s)$ with a simple pole (part a) or a double pole (part b) at the origin plus a complex-conjugate pair, requiring partial fractions, completing the square, and a stability judgement from the pole locations. Solve your own copy of the paper with its printed numerators; the method below transfers unchanged.
Given. Two transforms sharing the quadratic $s^2-6s+13=(s-3)^2+2^2$, whose roots are the complex pair $s=3\pm2j$ — both in the right half-plane.
Find. (a) $y_a(t)$ and its stability; (b) $y_b(t)$ and its stability.
Problem 7(a): the inverse transform $y(t)=-\tfrac{3}{13}+e^{3t}\!\left(\tfrac{3}{13}\cos 2t+\tfrac{2}{13}\sin 2t\right)$ oscillates at $\omega=2$ inside an envelope that grows as $e^{3t}$ — the response is unbounded, so the system is unstable (poles $3\pm2j$ in the right half-plane).
Approach. Expand each $Y(s)$ by partial fractions, complete the square on the quadratic to expose the damped/undamped sinusoid $e^{3t}(\cos2t,\sin2t)$, invert term by term, then read stability directly from the pole locations (any pole with positive real part ⇒ unbounded response).
(a) Complete the square and invert. With $s^2-6s+13=(s-3)^2+2^2$, regroup the numerator as $B(s-3)+(3B+C)$. Then $\dfrac{B(s-3)}{(s-3)^2+2^2}\!\rightarrow\!Be^{3t}\cos2t$ and $\dfrac{3B+C}{(s-3)^2+2^2}\!\rightarrow\!\dfrac{3B+C}{2}e^{3t}\sin2t$, giving $$\boxed{y_a(t)=-\frac{3}{13}+e^{3t}\!\left(\frac{3}{13}\cos2t+\frac{2}{13}\sin2t\right).}$$
(a) Stability. The oscillatory term carries the factor $e^{3t}$ (poles at $s=3\pm2j$, real part $+3>0$), so $|y_a|\to\infty$: the response is unstable (unbounded, growing oscillation).
(b) Invert. The double pole at the origin contributes $A+Bt$; the complex pair contributes $e^{3t}$ terms as before (numerator regrouped as $C(s-3)+(3C+D)$, sine coefficient $(3C+D)/2=12/169$): $$\boxed{y_b(t)=-\frac{5}{169}-\frac{3}{13}\,t+e^{3t}\!\left(\frac{5}{169}\cos2t+\frac{12}{169}\sin2t\right).}$$
(b) Stability. Again the $e^{3t}$ envelope (poles $3\pm2j$ in the RHP) dominates the ramp and constant terms, so the response grows without bound — unstable.