Question 1 of 6: Reversible step-growth polymerization of PET — conversion, chain length, PDI
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format: 04-CHEM-B8 Polymer Engineering, December 2015. Open-book, 3 hours,
non-communicating calculator, graph paper supplied. Six problems, each worth 25 marks; four
problems constitute a complete paper (only the first four in the answer book are marked). For
completeness this solution works all six questions in full.
Reference texts: Rudin & Choi, The Elements of Polymer Science and Engineering,
3rd ed.; Odian, Principles of Polymerization, 4th ed.; Sperling, Introduction to Physical
Polymer Science, 4th ed.; Young & Lovell, Introduction to Polymers, 3rd ed.;
Crawford, Plastics Engineering, 3rd ed. (extrusion & creep).
Question 1: Reversible step-growth polymerization of PET — conversion, chain length, PDI (25 marks)
Given. Self-condensation of BHET modelled as a reversible A–B step polymerization
that releases a small molecule (ethylene glycol) which is not removed (closed system). Data:
Find. Fractional conversion \(p\), number-average chain length \(\bar X_n\), and
polydispersity index (PDI) at each temperature after 10 min.
Integrated conversion–time curves. At 280 °C the reaction is fast enough to
approach the equilibrium ceiling \(p_{eq}=0.414\) within 10 min; at 200 °C it is still climbing
(\(p=0.166\)). Because the condensate is not removed, conversion cannot exceed \(p_{eq}\).
Approach. Treat the reactive end-groups as a single reversible bimolecular reaction,
write the net rate in terms of conversion \(p\), evaluate \(k_p\) at each temperature by Arrhenius,
integrate to \(t=10\) min, then convert \(p\) to \(\bar X_n=1/(1-p)\) and \(\text{PDI}=1+p\).
Rate law in terms of conversion. With functional-group concentration \(c=c_0(1-p)\),
ester bonds \(=c_0p\) and released glycol \(=c_0p\), the net forward rate is
$$-\frac{dc}{dt}=k_p c^2 - k_p'(c_0p)^2
\;\Longrightarrow\;
\frac{dp}{dt}=k_p c_0\!\left[(1-p)^2-\frac{p^2}{K_p}\right]$$
since \(k_p'=k_p/K_p\). Setting \(dp/dt=0\) gives the equilibrium ceiling
\(K_p=p_{eq}^2/(1-p_{eq})^2\), i.e. \(p_{eq}=\sqrt{K_p}/(1+\sqrt{K_p})=0.414\).
Rate constants (Arrhenius). The pre-exponent \(1.98\) is \(R\) in cal·mol\(^{-1}\)·K\(^{-1}\),
so the activation energy is \(1.5\times10^4\) cal/mol. Evaluating:
$$k_p(553.15\,\text{K})=4\times10^4 e^{-15000/(1.98\cdot553.15)}=0.0451\ \text{L mol}^{-1}\text{min}^{-1},\quad
k_p(473.15\,\text{K})=4.45\times10^{-3}$$
Hence \(k_pc_0=0.206\ \text{min}^{-1}\) at 280 °C but only \(0.0204\ \text{min}^{-1}\) at 200 °C — a
ten-fold difference in effective rate.
Integrate to 10 min. Numerically integrating the conversion ODE (Euler, \(\Delta t\to0\))
gives
$$p_{280}=\boxed{0.413}\quad(\text{essentially at } p_{eq}),\qquad p_{200}=\boxed{0.166}$$
The hot case has all but reached the reversible ceiling; the cold case is still rising (see figure).
Chain length and dispersity. By the Carothers relation \(\bar X_n=1/(1-p)\) and, for the
most-probable step-growth distribution, \(\text{PDI}=\bar X_w/\bar X_n = 1+p\):
$$\bar X_{n,280}=\frac{1}{1-0.413}=1.70,\ \ \text{PDI}=1.41;\qquad
\bar X_{n,200}=\frac{1}{1-0.166}=1.20,\ \ \text{PDI}=1.17$$
Quantity
280 °C
200 °C
Conversion \(p\) (10 min)
0.413
0.166
Average chain length \(\bar X_n=1/(1-p)\)
1.70
1.20
Polydispersity index \(1+p\)
1.41
1.17
Check
The low conversions are physically correct, not an
error: with the glycol condensate retained in the melt, the reaction is throttled by its own equilibrium
(\(p_{eq}=0.414\)). Real PET manufacture drives \(p\to0.99\!+\) precisely by pulling the glycol off under
vacuum, which removes the reverse term entirely. The numbers above describe the sealed-ampoule kinetics
the question specifies.