16-Civ-A1 Elementary Structural Analysis · December 2013
Question 5 of 8: Indeterminate frame by moment distribution / slope–deflection
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
National Exams, December 2013 — 98-Civ-A1 Elementary Structural Analysis. Three-hour, closed-book examination (approved Sharp/Casio calculator only). Format: six questions constitute a complete paper — answer all of #1–#5 and any one of #6, #7 or #8. All eight questions are solved below for completeness.
Reference texts: R.C. Hibbeler, Structural Analysis (10th ed., Pearson) — determinacy, method of joints/sections, virtual-work deflections, moment distribution, slope–deflection, influence lines; A. Kassimali, Structural Analysis (6th ed., Cengage) — internal hinges and compound structures. Sign convention: sagging bending moment positive; upward reactions positive; tension member forces positive (T), compression negative (C).
Question 5: Indeterminate frame by moment distribution / slope–deflection (20 marks)
Frame 5: horizontal beam fixed at node 1; a vertical prop 2–5 (roller at 5) at x = 8 m; roller at node 3 (x = 14 m); 6 kN/m over 1–2, 16 kN at x = 11 m, 4 kN at the tip (node 4).
Given. Horizontal beam 1–2–3–4 with node 1 fixed, a vertical prop 2–5 (3 m long, roller at foot 5) at x = 8 m, and a roller at node 3 (x = 14 m); 1 m overhang to the free tip (node 4). Loads: 6 kN/m over span 1–2 (0–8 m), 16 kN at x = 11 m (mid of span 2–3), 4 kN at the tip. Two degrees of static indeterminacy.
Find. Member end moments, SFD/BMD ordinates, and reactions.
Approach. Solve the two rotational unknowns at the free joints (2 and 3) by slope–deflection, using fixed-end moments for the span loads. The prop 2–5 (roller foot) develops only axial force, so it contributes no bending stiffness — it simply provides a vertical reaction at node 2.
Joint balance (moment distribution / slope–deflection). Solving the joint-rotation equations at nodes 2 and 3 gives the member end moments (hogging negative):
Member 1–2: $M_{12}=-36$ kN·m at the fixed wall, $M_{21}=-24$ kN·m at node 2.
Member 2–3: $M_{23}=-24$ kN·m at node 2, $M_{32}=-4$ kN·m at node 3 — joint 2 balances since $M_{21}+M_{23}=0$ (the prop carries no moment).
Member 3–4: the statically determinate overhang delivers exactly $-4$ kN·m at node 3, balancing $M_{32}$.
Shears / reactions. Span 1–2: $V=+25.5$ kN at the wall, zero at x = 4.25 m, $-22.5$ kN at node 2. Span 2–3: $+11.33$ then $-4.67$ kN across the 16 kN load. Overhang: $+4$ kN. Reactions: wall node 1 $\to V=25.5$ kN ↑, $M=36$ kN·m; prop foot node 5 $\to 33.83$ kN ↑; roller node 3 $\to 8.67$ kN ↑ (sum $=68$ kN $=6\!\times\!8+16+4$ ✓).
BMD 5 (developed along the beam): hogging −36 at the wall, sagging +18 mid-span 1–2, hogging −24 at node 2, sagging +10 under the 16 kN load, hogging −4 at node 3.