NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

16-Civ-A1 Elementary Structural Analysis · December 2016

Question 8 of 8: Frame deflection by virtual work

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

Reference texts: R.C. Hibbeler, Structural Analysis (10th ed., Pearson) — determinacy (Ch. 2), method of joints/sections (Ch. 3), shear & moment diagrams (Ch. 4), virtual-work deflections (Ch. 8–9), influence lines (Ch. 6), moment distribution / slope–deflection (Ch. 11–12); A. Kassimali, Structural Analysis (6th ed., Cengage) — internal hinges, compound (Gerber) beams, three-hinged and two-hinged frames. Sign convention: sagging bending moment positive; upward reactions positive; member tension positive (T), compression negative (C).

The paper directs candidates to answer Q1–Q5 and then one of Q6/Q7/Q8. For completeness all eight questions are worked here. Because every structure is defined entirely by its figure, each drawing has been read from the printed figure and redrawn to scale below.

Question 8: Frame deflection by virtual work (20 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given. Trapezoidal frame: pin (1)$=(0,0)$, roller (4)$=(7.2,0)$; corners (2)$=(1.6,1.2)$, (3)$=(5.6,1.2)$; top span (2)–(3) is $4\text{ m}$; $12\text{ kN}$ point loads down at (2) and (3); $EI=4000\text{ kN}\cdot\text{m}^2$, flexural strain only.

Find. Vertical deflection at the mid-point of (2)–(3).

12 kN12 kNδ ? (centre)1.6221.61.2(1)(2)(3)(4)
Q8 — determinate trapezoidal frame; deflection sought at the centre of the top span.

Approach. The frame is determinate (pin + roller). Apply a unit vertical load at the mid-point of (2)–(3) and evaluate $\delta=\dfrac{1}{EI}\int M\,m\,ds$ over all members.

  1. Real moments. By symmetry $R_{(1)}=R_{(4)}=12\text{ kN}$, $H=0$. Each leg carries a linear moment $0\to12(1.6)=19.2\text{ kN}\cdot\text{m}$; the shear in the top span is $12-12=0$, so span (2)–(3) is in uniform moment $M=19.2\text{ kN}\cdot\text{m}$.
  2. Virtual moments. The unit load at mid-span gives legs $0\to0.8$ and a triangular $m$ on (2)–(3) peaking at $1.8$ at the centre ($0.8$ at each end).
  3. Integrate. Top span: $\int M\,m\,ds=19.2\times5.2=99.84$; two legs: $2\times\tfrac{19.2(0.8)(2)}{3}=20.48$. Hence $$\delta=\frac{99.84+20.48}{4000}=0.03008\text{ m}.$$

Result: $\boxed{\delta_{\text{centre}} = 30.08\text{ mm downward}}$. An independent stiffness-matrix (FEM) solution with axially-rigid members returns $30.08\text{ mm}$, confirming the hand integration.

It is worth pausing on why the top span carries pure moment. A vertical cut anywhere in (2)–(3) has, to its left, the $12\text{ kN}$ reaction at (1) and the $12\text{ kN}$ load at (2); these are equal and opposite, so the transverse shear is exactly zero and the bending moment holds constant at $12(1.6)=19.2\text{ kN}\cdot\text{m}$ across the whole span. That single observation collapses the span integral $\int M\,m\,ds$ into $19.2$ times the area under the triangular virtual diagram, and the only remaining work is the two short legs. Because the loads are symmetric about the mid-span, the virtual diagram is symmetric too, which is what makes its area a clean $5.2$.

QuantityValue
Support reactions$R_{(1)}=R_{(4)}=12\text{ kN}\uparrow$, $H=0$
Real moment in span (2)–(3)$19.2\text{ kN}\cdot\text{m}$ (uniform)
$\int M m\,ds$ (span + legs)$99.84+20.48 = 120.32\text{ kN}^2\text{m}^3$
Deflection at centre$30.08\text{ mm}$ downward
Back to the paper →