NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

16-Civ-A2 Elementary Structural Design · December 2013

Question 3 of 7: Maximum Factored Load on a Sign Standard Post

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

Paper format. National Examinations, December 2013 — 98-Civ-A2 Elementary Structural Design. Three hours, CLOSED BOOK (handbooks and textbooks permitted). Seven questions in three parts: Part A (A1–A3, steel), Part B (B1–B3, reinforced concrete), Part C (C1, timber). A candidate answers two from Part A, two from Part B and the one question in Part C — five in total, all of equal value. All seven are solved here, because the set is a study resource rather than an exam script.

Design standards. Steel to CAN/CSA-S16, concrete to CAN/CSA-A23.3, timber to CAN/CSA-O86, with load combinations from the National Building Code of Canada.

Reference texts.

Check: load factors. Note 6 on page 1 states “All loads shown are unfactored, unless otherwise noted”, so the factoring is left to the candidate. Throughout this paper the point loads drawn on the figures are taken as live load (factor 1.5), concrete self-weight as dead load (factor 1.25), and the wind load named in B3 as wind (1.25D + 1.4W). Question A3 asks for the maximum factored load, so no further factoring is applied there. Where a grade is not stated for a fabricated element the plate grade named in the question governs.

Question A3: Maximum Factored Load on a Sign Standard Post (4 + 4 + 12 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given. A circular hollow section 273.1 mm OD × 12.7 mm wall, G40.21M 350W Class H ($F_y = 350$ MPa). From Figure A3 the post rises 10 m from a rigid concrete foundation and is free at the top. Two horizontal arms project on diametrically opposite sides: the longer arm reaches 3 m and carries $2P_f$, the shorter arm reaches 2 m and carries $P_f$, both acting downwards. $P_f$ is already a factored load.

Find. The greatest factored load $P_f$ the post can carry as a beam-column under CSA S16.

2PP 3 m2 m10 m CHS 273.1 × 12.7 concrete foundation (rigid)
Figure A3 — free-standing sign post with two diametrically opposed cantilever arms. The net base moment is $2P_f(3) - P_f(2) = 4P_f$.

Approach. Reduce the two arm loads to an axial force and a net moment at the base, obtain the section properties and the compressive and bending resistances, then solve the S16 beam-column interaction equation for the largest $P_f$ that keeps the utilisation at unity.

  1. Reduce the loads to the post axis. Both arms load the post in compression, while their moments about the post act in opposite senses because the arms are diametrically opposite: $$C_f = 2P_f + P_f = 3P_f, \qquad M_f = 2P_f(3.0) - P_f(2.0) = 4P_f \text{ kN}\cdot\text{m}$$ The moment is constant over the full 10 m height, since no load is applied along the post — a uniform-moment case, which is the most severe distribution for stability.
  2. Section properties. With $D = 273.1$ mm and $d = 247.7$ mm, $$A = \tfrac{\pi}{4}(D^2 - d^2) = 10\,389 \text{ mm}^2, \qquad I = \tfrac{\pi}{64}(D^4 - d^4) = 88.27 \times 10^6 \text{ mm}^4$$ $$r = \sqrt{I/A} = 92.2 \text{ mm}, \qquad Z = \frac{D^3 - d^3}{6} = 862 \times 10^3 \text{ mm}^3$$ The wall slenderness $D/t = 21.5$ is well below the Class 1 limit $13\,000/F_y = 37.1$, so the tube is Class 1 in both compression and bending.
  3. Effective length and compressive resistance. A column fixed at the base and free at the top has $K = 2.0$, so $KL = 20\,000$ mm and $KL/r = 217$ — a very slender member. The non-dimensional slenderness is $$\lambda = \frac{KL}{r}\sqrt{\frac{F_y}{\pi^2 E}} = 217\sqrt{\frac{350}{\pi^2(200\,000)}} = 2.889$$ For a Class H hollow section $n = 2.24$, giving $$C_r = \phi A F_y \left(1+\lambda^{2n}\right)^{-1/n} = 0.90(10\,389)(350)(1+2.889^{4.48})^{-1/2.24} = \boxed{391 \text{ kN}}$$ Buckling has cut the squash load of 3273 kN to about 12 % of its value.
  4. Bending resistance. A circular hollow section cannot buckle laterally — every axis is a principal axis with the same $I$ — so lateral-torsional buckling does not apply and the Class 1 section reaches its plastic moment: $$M_r = \phi Z F_y = 0.90(862\times10^3)(350) = 271.5 \text{ kN}\cdot\text{m}$$
  5. Moment amplification. The Euler load in the plane of bending is $$C_e = \frac{\pi^2 E I}{(KL)^2} = \frac{\pi^2 (200\,000)(88.27\times10^6)}{(20\,000)^2} = 436 \text{ kN}$$ For uniform single-curvature moment $\kappa = -1$ and $\omega_1 = 0.6 - 0.4\kappa = 1.0$, so $U_{1} = \omega_1/(1 - C_f/C_e)$. Because $C_e$ is barely above $C_r$, this amplification will be significant.
  6. Solve the interaction equation. For a Class 1 member in uniaxial bending, S16 Cl. 13.8.2 requires $$\frac{C_f}{C_r} + \frac{0.85\,U_{1}M_f}{M_r} \le 1.0$$ Substituting $C_f = 3P_f$ and $M_f = 4P_f$ and solving iteratively for the overall member strength (using $C_r = 391$ kN), $$\frac{3P_f}{391} + \frac{0.85(4P_f)}{271.5\left(1 - 3P_f/436\right)} = 1.0 \;\Rightarrow\; P_f = 40.0 \text{ kN}$$ The cross-sectional strength check, which uses the unreduced $C_r = \phi A F_y = 3273$ kN, yields $P_f = 50.0$ kN and therefore does not govern.
  7. Confirm the governing case. At $P_f = 40.0$ kN the actions are $C_f = 120$ kN and $M_f = 160$ kN·m, with $U_1 = 1/(1 - 120/436) = 1.381$. The two interaction terms are 0.31 and 0.69, so the post is moment-dominated: $$\boxed{P_f = 40 \text{ kN}}$$ with the shorter arm carrying 40 kN and the longer arm 80 kN.
QuantityValue
Area / $I$ / $r$ / $Z$10 389 mm2 / 88.27 × 106 mm4 / 92.2 mm / 862 × 103 mm3
ClassificationClass 1 ($D/t = 21.5 < 37.1$)
$KL/r$ (K = 2.0)217
$C_r$ (overall) / $C_r$ (cross-section)391 kN / 3273 kN
$M_r$ / $C_e$ / $U_1$271.5 kN·m / 436 kN / 1.381
Governing checkOverall member strength (Cl. 13.8.2)
Maximum factored load$P_f$ = 40 kN (arms carry 80 kN and 40 kN)

Check: effective length in the amplification term. $C_e$ is computed with the same $KL = 20$ m used for buckling, which is the conservative reading of a free-standing post. Some designers use $K = 1$ for the in-plane amplification, which raises $C_e$ fourfold and lifts $P_f$ to about 53 kN. The conservative value is reported, and the answer should be stated with the assumption — exactly what Note 1 on page 1 invites.