Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. National Examinations, May 2014 — 98-Civ-A2
Elementary Structural Design, 3 hours, closed book (handbooks and textbooks permitted).
Seven questions in three parts: Part A (A1–A3, steel), Part B (B1–B3, reinforced concrete)
and Part C (C1, timber). The candidate answers two from Part A, two from Part B and the single
Part C question — five solutions in all, of equal value. All seven are solved here,
because the set is intended as a study resource. Page 1 states that
all loads shown are unfactored, so the load factors are applied below rather than assumed
to be built in.
CISC, Handbook of Steel Construction — section property tables and the standard
beam load/moment diagrams referenced by Question A1.
CSA A23.3, Design of Concrete Structures — Clauses 10 (flexure and axial load) and
11 (shear, simplified method).
CSA O86, Engineering Design in Wood — Clause 6 (sawn lumber), Tables 6.3.1B
(Beam and Stringer specified strengths) and 6.4.2 (service-condition factors).
National Building Code of Canada — load combinations
1.25D + 1.5L.
Check: the figures on page 3 of the paper are hand-drawn; every dimension, support type and load below was read from the printed figures. The 300 kN, 250 kN, 300 kN and 80 kN forces are treated as
live load (factor 1.5) because the paper labels them only as unfactored applied loads;
concrete self-weight is the sole dead load and carries 1.25.
Find. The factored moment and shear delivered to the connection at B, and a welded
detail (weld type, size and length) that develops both, together with the checks on the supporting
column that the detail implies.
Approach. Factor the load, read the fixed-end moment and end shear from the
standard beam diagram in the Handbook, convert the moment into a flange force couple that the flange
welds carry, size the web welds for the shear alone, then confirm the column flange and web can
accept the concentrated flange force.
Factor the applied load. The load is specified (unfactored) live load, so
$$P_f = 1.5 P = 1.5(300) = 450\ \text{kN}$$
Read the end actions from the Handbook beam diagram. For a prismatic beam
built in at both ends with a central concentrated load, the tabulated end moment and end shear are
$M = PL/8$ and $V = P/2$. Substituting the factored load,
$$M_f = \frac{P_f L}{8} = \frac{450(6.0)}{8} = 337.5\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}, \qquad
V_f = \frac{P_f}{2} = \frac{450}{2} = 225\ \text{kN}$$
These are the actions the connection at B must transfer. As a sanity check the beam itself is
comfortably adequate: $M_r = \phi Z_x F_y = 0.90(2360\times10^{3})(350) = 743\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}$,
so $M_f/M_r = 0.45$ and the connection, not the member, is the design problem.
Convert the moment to a flange force couple. In a directly-welded moment
connection the moment is carried almost entirely by the flanges, acting at the flange centroids a
distance $(d - t)$ apart:
$$T_f = C_f = \frac{M_f}{d - t} = \frac{337.5\times10^{6}}{533 - 15.6} = 652\,300\ \text{N}$$
$$\boxed{T_f = 652\ \text{kN}\ \text{tension in the top flange, equal compression in the bottom}}$$
Size the flange welds. Welding each flange on both its upper and lower surface
gives an effective length per flange of $L_w = 2b - w = 2(209) - 10.2 = 408$ mm. The weld runs
transverse to the force, so $\theta = 90^\circ$ and S16 Clause 13.13.2.2 gives, per millimetre of leg
size $D$,
$$v_r = 0.67\,\phi_w (0.707 D) X_u (1 + 0.50\sin^{1.5}\theta) = 0.67(0.67)(0.707D)(490)(1.5) = 233.3\,D\ \text{N/mm}$$
Equating supply to demand,
$$D_{req} = \frac{T_f / L_w}{233.3} = \frac{652\,300/408}{233.3} = 6.86\ \text{mm}$$
Rounding up to the next standard size, $D = 8$ mm, which supplies
$V_r = 233.3(8)(408) = 761\ \text{kN} > 652\ \text{kN}$.
$$\boxed{\text{Flanges: 8 mm fillet welds, both faces, full flange width}}$$
A complete-joint-penetration groove weld is the equally valid alternative: it develops the full
flange, $T_r = \phi b t F_y = 0.90(209)(15.6)(350) = 1027\ \text{kN}$, and is usually preferred where
the flange force approaches the flange capacity.
Size the web welds for the shear. Fillet welds down both sides of the web run
parallel to the shear, so $\theta = 0^\circ$ and $v_r = 0.67(0.67)(0.707D)(490) = 155.5\,D$ N/mm.
Taking a practical weld length of 460 mm clear of the flange fillets, the demand is
$225\,000/(2\times460) = 245$ N/mm, requiring only $D = 1.6$ mm. The minimum fillet size for the
19.6 mm column flange (S16 Table 7) governs instead:
$$\boxed{\text{Web: 6 mm fillet welds, both sides, 460 mm long}\ \ (V_r = 858\ \text{kN} > 225\ \text{kN})}$$
The beam web itself is not critical: $V_r = \phi d w (0.66F_y) = 0.90(533)(10.2)(231) = 1130$ kN.
Check the supporting column. The 652 kN flange force arrives as a concentrated
load on the column flange. Local flange bending gives
$B_r = 0.90(6.25)t_{fc}^2 F_y = 0.90(6.25)(19.6)^2(350) = 756\ \text{kN} > 652\ \text{kN}$, and column
web yielding over the dispersed length gives
$B_r = \phi(t + 10k)F_y w_c = 0.90(15.6 + 300)(350)(11.9) = 1183\ \text{kN}$. Both exceed the applied
flange force, so the W610 × 125 accepts the connection without transverse stiffeners — though
the flange-bending margin is only 16 %, and horizontal stiffeners opposite each beam flange remain
the prudent detail if the beam is ever re-loaded.
The finished detail is therefore a directly-welded rigid connection: flanges welded across their
full width to the column face, web welded down both sides for the shear, with the two welds sized
independently because the flange couple and the web shear act on essentially independent parts of
the section.
Result
Value
Factored load
450 kN
Factored moment at B
337.5 kN·m
Factored shear at B
225 kN
Flange force couple
652 kN
Flange weld
8 mm fillet, both faces, 408 mm effective ($V_r = 761$ kN)
Web weld
6 mm fillet, both sides, 2 × 460 mm ($V_r = 858$ kN)