NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

16-Civ-A2 Elementary Structural Design · December 2017

Question 2 of 7: A2 — Maximum factored load on an eccentrically loaded CHS pole

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

Paper format. National Examinations, December 2017 — 16-Civ-A2 Elementary Structural Design. Three hours, closed book (handbooks and textbooks permitted). Seven questions in three parts: Part A (A1–A3, steel), Part B (B1–B3, reinforced concrete) and Part C (C1, timber). The candidate answers two from Part A, two from Part B and the single Part C question — five solutions of equal value. All seven are solved here, because the set is a study resource. Page 1 states that all loads shown are unfactored, so every question below applies its own load combination.

Reference texts and standards.

Check: figure page. All five figures are hand-drawn on page 3 of the paper. Every dimension used below is cross-checked against the labelled dimension chains (for example 200 overhang + 3 × 200 stems + 2 × 600 voids + 200 overhang = 2200 in Figure B3). Where the exam leaves a quantity undimensioned (the tie length in Figure A3, member thicknesses in Figure B1) the assumption is stated in the question concerned, as NOTE 1 on page 1 invites.

Question 2: A2 — Maximum factored load on an eccentrically loaded CHS pole (10 + 10 = 20 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given.

QuantityValue
Round HSS outside diameter, $D$406.4 mm
Wall thickness, $t$9.53 mm
Grade G40.21 350W, class H$F_y$ = 350 MPa, $n$ = 2.24
Height, $L$10 000 mm
End conditionsfixed base, free top ⇒ $K$ = 2.0
Load eccentricity, $e$1.2 m = 1200 mm
Modulus of elasticity, $E$200 000 MPa

Find. The largest factored bracket load $P_F$ for which the pole satisfies every applicable S16 13.8.2 combined axial-and-bending check.

Approach. Compute the section properties of the tube, classify it, obtain the compressive and bending resistances for the cantilever effective length $KL = 20$ m, then write the two governing 13.8.2 interaction equations with $M_f = P_F e$ and invert each for $P_F$; the smaller answer governs.

  1. Section properties of the round HSS. With inside diameter $d = D - 2t = 387.3$ mm,$$A=\frac{\pi}{4}\left(D^2-d^2\right)=11\,882\ \text{mm}^2,\qquad I=\frac{\pi}{64}\left(D^4-d^4\right)=234.1\times10^{6}\ \text{mm}^4$$ so $r=\sqrt{I/A}=140.4$ mm, and the plastic modulus of a circular tube is $Z=(D^3-d^3)/6=1501\times10^{3}$ mm3.
  2. Classify the tube. For a circular hollow section in combined compression and bending the class is set by $D/t = 406.4/9.53 = 42.6$ against the S16 limits $13\,000/F_y = 37.1$ (Class 1) and $18\,000/F_y = 51.4$ (Class 2). The tube is Class 2, so the plastic moment may still be used and $\beta = 0.85$ applies in the interaction equations.
  3. Axial resistance for the cantilever. A pole fixed at the base and free at the top has $K = 2.0$, so $KL = 20\,000$ mm and $KL/r = 142.5$ — a very slender column. The non-dimensional slenderness is $\lambda = (KL/r)\sqrt{F_y/(\pi^2 E)} = 1.897$, and with $n = 2.24$ for a class H (stress-relieved) hollow section,$$C_r=\phi A F_y\left(1+\lambda^{2n}\right)^{-1/n}=0.90(11\,882)(350)\left(1+1.897^{4.48}\right)^{-1/2.24}=\boxed{1014\ \text{kN}}$$ against a squash load $\phi A F_y = 3743$ kN: slenderness has removed 73 % of the axial capacity.
  4. Bending resistance. A circular tube has no lateral-torsional buckling mode — every axis is a principal axis of equal stiffness, so the section cannot buckle sideways out of the plane of bending. Class 2 therefore gives the full plastic moment,$$M_r=\phi Z F_y = 0.90(1501\times10^{3})(350)=473\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}$$ The Euler load in the plane of bending, needed for the second-order amplifier, is $C_e=\pi^2EI/(KL)^2=1155$ kN — only 14 % above $C_r$, which warns in advance that the amplification will be severe.
  5. Cross-sectional strength, S16 13.8.2(a). The moment at the base is $M_f = P_F(1.2)$ in kN·m. For a member of an unbraced frame $\omega_1 = 1.0$, so $U_1 = 1/(1-P_F/C_e)$ and the check reads$$\frac{P_F}{\phi A F_y}+\frac{0.85\,U_1 M_f}{M_r}\le 1.0$$ Because $U_1$ itself grows with $P_F$ this must be solved by iteration (a single pass with $U_1 = 1.0$ badly overestimates the answer). Convergence gives $P_F = 311$ kN, at which $U_1 = 1/(1-311/1155) = 1.369$.
  6. Overall member strength, S16 13.8.2(b). Here the axial term uses $C_r$ from step 3, and S16 13.8.4 sets $U_1 = 1.0$ for a member of an unbraced (sway) frame, since the maximum moment and the maximum second-order effect already coincide at the base:$$\frac{P_F}{C_r}+\frac{0.85\,M_f}{M_r}\le 1.0\;\Longrightarrow\;\frac{P_F}{1014}+\frac{0.85(1.2P_F)}{473}\le 1.0$$ which inverts directly to $P_F = 318$ kN. Check (c), lateral-torsional buckling, does not apply to a circular tube.
  7. Governing answer. The two checks are within 2 % of each other — the paper is calibrated so that neither is obviously redundant — and the smaller controls:$$\boxed{P_F = 311\ \text{kN}}$$ The corresponding base moment is $M_f = 311(1.2) = 373$ kN·m. Note that the moment term, not the axial term, is doing most of the work: at the governing load the axial ratio is only $311/3743 = 0.08$ while the amplified moment ratio is 0.92.
QuantityValue
Gross area / radius of gyration11 882 mm2 / 140.4 mm
Class (D/t = 42.6)Class 2
Effective slenderness, $KL/r$142.5 ($K$ = 2.0)
Compressive resistance, $C_r$1014 kN
Bending resistance, $M_r$473 kN·m
Euler load, $C_e$1155 kN
$P_F$ from 13.8.2(a), cross-section311 kN (governs)
$P_F$ from 13.8.2(b), overall member318 kN
Maximum factored load, $P_F$311 kN (base moment 373 kN·m)