Question 7 of 7: C1 — Oblique sawn-timber roof purlins
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. National Examinations, May 2017 — 16-Civ-A2 Elementary Structural Design. Three hours, closed book (handbooks and textbooks permitted). Seven questions in three parts: Part A (A1–A3, structural steel to CSA S16), Part B (B1–B3, reinforced concrete to CSA A23.3) and Part C (C1, timber to CSA O86). A candidate answers two from Part A, two from Part B and the one question in Part C — five solutions of equal value. All seven are solved here, because the set is a study resource rather than a sitting.
Reference texts.
CSA S16:19, Design of Steel Structures — Clauses 11 (section class), 13.3 (compression), 13.5 (bending), 13.8 (axial force and bending), 13.13 (welds), 14.3 (concentrated forces).
CISC, Handbook of Steel Construction — rolled-section dimensions and properties, weld tables.
CSA A23.3:19, Design of Concrete Structures — Clauses 10 (flexure and axial load), 11 (shear).
CSA O86:19, Engineering Design in Wood — Clause 6 (sawn lumber), Tables 6.3.1B and 6.4.5.
Canadian Wood Council, Wood Design Manual; National Building Code of Canada 2020 (load combinations).
Load factors. NOTE 6 on page 1 states that all loads shown are unfactored. The point loads drawn on Figures A1, B1 and B2 are occupancy loads, so they are factored by 1.5; the only dead load anywhere in this paper is the concrete self-weight of the Question B2 beam, which takes 1.25. This follows NBCC combination 2, 1.25D + 1.5L.
Check — figure page. Two figure readings are flagged where they arise: in Figure B1 the 350 kN load acts at midspan of beam BA (3.5 m from B), not at joint B; and the 80 kN horizontal load acts 4 m below B, i.e. 6 m above the pin at C.
Find. A sawn timber size that satisfies biaxial bending, shear and deflection for the oblique purlin.
Figure C1 — oblique purlin: gravity resolved normal and tangential to the roof plane.
Approach. Convert the areal loads to a line load on one purlin, resolve gravity into components normal and tangential to the roof plane, design for biaxial bending using the linear interaction of O86, then check shear and the resultant deflection at specified load.
Line loads. Each purlin carries a 2.5 m tributary width of roof:
$$w_D = 1.5(2.5) = 3.75\ \text{kN/m}, \qquad w_L = 3.0(2.5) = 7.5\ \text{kN/m}$$
$$w_f = 1.25(3.75) + 1.5(7.5) = \boxed{15.94\ \text{kN/m}}, \qquad w_{spec} = 11.25\ \text{kN/m}$$
Resolve onto the roof axes. Gravity acts vertically but the purlin's principal axes are tilted with the roof, so the load splits into a component normal to the roof (strong-axis bending) and one down the slope (weak-axis bending):
$$w_{fx} = w_f \cos 18^\circ = 15.94(0.9511) = 15.16\ \text{kN/m}$$
$$w_{fy} = w_f \sin 18^\circ = 15.94(0.3090) = 4.92\ \text{kN/m}$$
The tangential component is the whole point of the word "oblique" — a purlin laid normal to a pitched roof bends about both axes at once.
Modification factors. Standard duration gives KD = 1.0; dry service KS = 1.0; the purlins at 2.5 m centres are not a load-sharing system so KH = 1.0; treated but not incised, so KT = 1.0; and the roof sheathing holds the compression edge, so KL = 1.0. The size factor is the only one that bites:
$$K_{Zb} = \left(\frac{305}{d}\right)^{1/9} \le 1.0$$
Try a 191 × 394 mm Beam-and-Stringer section. The section moduli are
$$S_x = \frac{bd^{2}}{6} = \frac{191(394)^{2}}{6} = 4.942\times10^{6}\ \text{mm}^{3}, \qquad S_y = \frac{db^{2}}{6} = 2.396\times10^{6}\ \text{mm}^{3}$$
with KZb = (305/394)1/9 = 0.972 for strong-axis bending and 1.0 for weak-axis bending (because b = 191 mm < 305 mm caps the factor at unity). Hence
$$M_{rx} = \phi f_b S_x K_{Zb} = 0.9(19.5)(4.942\times10^{6})(0.972) = 84.29\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}$$
$$M_{ry} = 0.9(19.5)(2.396\times10^{6})(1.0) = 42.04\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}$$
Biaxial interaction. With no axial load, O86 uses the linear form:
$$\frac{M_{fx}}{M_{rx}} + \frac{M_{fy}}{M_{ry}} = \frac{47.37}{84.29} + \frac{15.39}{42.04} = 0.562 + 0.366 = \boxed{0.93 \le 1.0}\ \checkmark$$
The tangential term contributes 39 % of the total. Checking strong-axis bending alone would return 0.56 and pass a section that is really at 93 % of capacity — and a lighter size would fail outright.
Shear. Using the O86 sawn-timber form with the two-thirds gross area,
$$V_f = \frac{w_{fx}L}{2} = \frac{15.16(5)}{2} = 37.9\ \text{kN}$$
$$V_r = \phi f_v \left(\frac{2A_g}{3}\right) = 0.9(1.5)\left(\frac{2(191)(394)}{3}\right) = 67.7\ \text{kN} \;>\; 37.9\ \text{kN}\ \checkmark$$
a utilisation of 0.56, so bending governs on this member.
Deflection at specified load. Deflection is checked unfactored. With Ix = 973.5×106 and Iy = 228.8×106 mm4,
$$\Delta_x = \frac{5w_xL^{4}}{384EI_x} = 7.45\ \text{mm}, \qquad \Delta_y = \frac{5w_yL^{4}}{384EI_y} = 10.30\ \text{mm}$$
Note that the in-plane deflection is the larger of the two despite carrying less than a third of the load, because Iy is 4.3 times smaller. Combining them vectorially,
$$\Delta = \sqrt{7.45^{2} + 10.30^{2}} = \boxed{12.7\ \text{mm}} \;<\; \frac{L}{240} = 20.8\ \text{mm}\ \checkmark$$
Design. Use 191 × 394 mm D.Fir-L Select Structural sawn purlins at 2.5 m centres, single span 5 m, laid with the 394 mm dimension normal to the roof plane, the compression edge restrained by the roof sheathing, and bearing seats at both ends detailed for the 37.9 kN reaction.
Quantity
Value
Factored / specified line load
15.94 / 11.25 kN/m
Components (normal / tangential)
15.16 / 4.92 kN/m
Mfx / Mfy
47.37 / 15.39 kN·m
Section
191 × 394 mm D.Fir-L Select Structural
Mrx / Mry
84.29 / 42.04 kN·m (KZb = 0.972 / 1.0)
Biaxial interaction
0.56 + 0.37 = 0.93 ≤ 1.0
Vf / Vr
37.9 / 67.7 kN (util. 0.56)
Deflections Δx / Δy / resultant
7.45 / 10.30 / 12.7 mm < L/240 = 20.8 mm
Check — load reference surface. Both areal loads are taken as acting per square metre of roof surface, so the tributary area is spacing × span measured along the slope. If the 3.0 kPa live load were specified on the horizontal projection instead (as snow normally is under NBCC), wL would fall to 7.5 cos 18° = 7.13 kN/m, Mfx to 45.7 kN·m, Mfy to 14.9 kN·m and the interaction to 0.90 — the same section, with slightly more reserve. The question does not distinguish, so the conservative reading is adopted and stated under NOTE 1.