16-Civ-A2 Elementary Structural Design · December 2018
Question 5 of 7: B2 — Uniform reinforced concrete cross-section and bar profile
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. National Examinations, December 2018 — 16-Civ-A2 Elementary Structural Design. Three hours, CLOSED BOOK (handbooks and textbooks permitted). Seven questions in three parts: Part A (A1–A3, steel to CSA S16), Part B (B1–B3, reinforced concrete to CSA A23.3), Part C (C1, timber to CSA O86). A candidate submits five solutions — two from Part A, two from Part B and the one question in Part C — all of equal value. All seven questions are solved below, because this set is a study resource rather than an exam script. Page 1 states that all loads shown are unfactored, so every load case is factored here (1.5 on the specified live/imposed loads, 1.25 on self weight) before any resistance is compared against it.
Reference texts.
CSA S16:19, Design of Steel Structures — and CISC, Handbook of Steel Construction, 11th ed. (section tables, Table 2 class limits, Clause 13.8 interaction, Clause 13.5 effective widths).
CSA A23.3:19, Design of Concrete Structures — and Cement Association of Canada, Concrete Design Handbook, 4th ed.
CSA O86:19, Engineering Design in Wood — and Canadian Wood Council, Wood Design Manual (glulam selection tables).
Kulak & Grondin, Limit States Design in Structural Steel, 11th ed., Chs. 4, 5, 8, 9.
National Building Code of Canada, Table 4.1.3.2 (load combinations).
Check — assumptions declared under Note 1 of the paper. (i) In A2 the single dimension h is the wall thickness of the whole fabricated panel (top plate and both stems), which is how the figure dimensions it. (ii) In A3 the bolted joint at the column is a simple (shear-only) connection and the steel tie is a two-force member, which is what makes the stub beam determinate. (iii) In B1/B3 the left column A–B is taken as 6 m high, level with the roller at D, as Figure B1 draws it; the beam self weight is included, the column self weight is not (it does not change any design action at C). (iv) In B2 and C1 the beam is drawn with a tapered soffit, but part (a) asks for a uniform cross-section, so a prismatic member is designed.
Question 5: B2 — Uniform reinforced concrete cross-section and bar profile (8 + 6 + 6 marks)
100 kN at 2.0 m and 100 kN at 3.0 m from A; 20 kN at C
Concrete self weight
to be included, 24 kN/m3
Materials
$f_c' = 35$ MPa, $f_y = 400$ MPa
Find. (a) a uniform rectangular cross-section, and (b) the layout of the longitudinal bars from A to C.
Figure B2 — simply supported span A to B with a loaded overhang B to C.
Approach. Assume a section, compute its self weight, analyse the determinate beam under factored loads, then check that the assumed section carries the peak sagging and hogging moments and the peak shear; finally set out the bars to follow the bending-moment diagram.
Trial section and factored loading. Take 400 mm x 700 mm, giving $0.40(0.70)(24) = 6.72$ kN/m of self weight. The factored loads are
$$P_{f1}=P_{f2}=1.5(100)=150\ \text{kN},\qquad P_{f,C}=1.5(20)=30\ \text{kN},\qquad w_f=1.25(6.72)=8.40\ \text{kN/m}$$
Reactions. Taking moments about A over the full 8 m length,
$$5R_B=150(2.0)+150(3.0)+30(8.0)+8.40\frac{(8.0)^{2}}{2}\quad\Longrightarrow\quad R_B=251.8\ \text{kN}$$
and $R_A = 150+150+30+8.40(8.0)-251.8 = 145.4$ kN.
Design moments and shear. The shear changes sign at the first point load, so the maximum sagging moment is there:
$$M_{\text{sag}}=145.4(2.0)-8.40\frac{(2.0)^{2}}{2}=\boxed{274.1\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}}\ \text{at }x=2.0\ \text{m}$$
The overhang hogs the support:
$$M_{\text{hog}}=-\left[30(3.0)+8.40\frac{(3.0)^{2}}{2}\right]=-127.8\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}\ \text{at B}$$
The largest shear is just left of B, $V_f = 196.6$ kN; on the overhang side it is only 55.2 kN.
Flexural steel for the sagging region. With 40 mm cover, 10M stirrups and 25M bars, $d = 700-40-11.3-12.6 = 636$ mm. Solving the rectangular-block equation for $M_f = 274.1$ kN·m gives $A_s = 1333$ mm2. Provide 3-25M bottom (1500 mm2); then $c/d = 0.111$, deeply tension-controlled, so the section will warn by cracking and deflecting before it fails.
Flexural steel over the support. $M_f = 127.8$ kN·m needs only 604 mm2 by analysis, but Clause 10.5.1.2 requires
$$A_{s,\min}=\frac{0.2\sqrt{35}(400)(700)}{400}=828\ \text{mm}^{2}$$
Provide 3-20M top (900 mm2) running the full overhang and lapping into the span.
Confirm the section size. The trial 400 x 700 works at a steel ratio of $1500/(400 \times 636) = 0.59\%$ — comfortably between the minimum and the tension-controlled ceiling — and gives a span-to-depth ratio of $5000/700 = 7.1$, so deflection is not a concern. Adopt 400 mm x 700 mm.
Shear design. With $d_v=\max(0.9d,\,0.72h)=572$ mm, the shear at $d_v$ from the face of B is 191.8 kN, and
$$V_c=0.65(0.18)\sqrt{35}(400)(572)=158.5\ \text{kN},\qquad V_s=\frac{0.85(200)(400)(572)\cot35^\circ}{300}=185.3\ \text{kN}$$
$$V_r=158.5+185.3=\boxed{343.8\ \text{kN}}\ \gg\ 191.8\ \text{kN}$$
10M closed stirrups at 300 mm from A through B and out along the overhang; the maximum permitted spacing is $\min(0.7d_v,600)=401$ mm.
Bar profile along the beam — part (b). The moment diagram is sagging from A to the point of contraflexure and hogging from there to C, so:
Bottom: 3-25M from A to B, all three carried into the support and anchored past its face (the code requires at least one third of the positive steel to continue into a simple support). No bottom steel is needed on the overhang, but two 20M bars are carried through as stirrup-holders.
Top: 3-20M from the free end C, across the support at B and lapped a development length plus $d$ into the span, terminating at about 1.0 m past B where the hogging moment has decayed to zero. Top steel is essential over the whole overhang — the tension face there is the upper one.
Stirrups: 10M closed at 300 mm over the entire 8 m, closing around all corner bars so the cage is continuous through the support region where the moment reverses.
The point of contraflexure sits at $x \approx 4.0$ m from A, and both the top and bottom layers must extend past it by at least $d$ = 636 mm before being cut off.
The single most important feature of the profile is that the reinforcement must change faces. Between A and the contraflexure point the tension is at the bottom; from there through B and out to C the tension is at the top. A cage detailed only for the mid-span sagging moment would leave the overhang with no tension steel at all — the classic failure of an overhanging beam.
Result
Value
Reactions $R_A$ / $R_B$
145.4 kN / 251.8 kN
Maximum sagging moment (at 2.0 m)
274.1 kN·m
Hogging moment at B
127.8 kN·m
Maximum shear (left of B)
196.6 kN
Uniform cross-section adopted
400 mm x 700 mm, $d$ = 636 mm
Bottom steel A to B (required 1333 mm2)
3-25M (1500 mm2)
Top steel over B and overhang ($A_{s,\min}$ = 828 mm2 governs)