NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

16-Civ-A2 Elementary Structural Design · Undated paper

Question 4 of 7: B1 — Moment and shear resistance of a reinforced concrete Tee

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

Paper format. 16-Civ-A2 Elementary Structural Design, May 2019 sitting, 3 hours, closed book with handbooks and textbooks permitted. Seven questions of 20 marks each: Part A (A1–A3, structural steel), Part B (B1–B3, reinforced concrete), Part C (C1, timber). The candidate answers two from Part A, two from Part B and one from Part C — all seven are solved here.

Reference texts. CSA S16 Design of Steel Structures and the CISC Handbook of Steel Construction (section properties, Tables 4-4 and 7); CSA A23.3 Design of Concrete Structures with Brzev & Pao, Reinforced Concrete Design: A Practical Approach; CSA O86 Engineering Design in Wood with the Canadian Wood Council Wood Design Manual; NBCC Part 4 for load combinations.

Page 1 of the paper specifies steel grade G40.21 300W unless noted, reinforcement 400W, and all loads shown unfactored unless otherwise stated.

Question 4: B1 — Moment and shear resistance of a reinforced concrete Tee (20 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given. A cast-in-place interior Tee formed by a 100 mm slab and a 300 mm wide stem, reinforced with 2–25M in the bottom of the stem, 2–10M in the flange and 10M closed stirrups at 300 mm.

Given data — B1
QuantitySymbolValue
Slab (flange) thickness$h_f$100 mm
Stem width / depth below slab$b_w$ / —300 mm / 400 mm
Overall depth$h$500 mm
Beam spacing / span$s$ / $\ell$2000 mm / 5000 mm
Tension steel$A_s$2–25M = 1000 mm²
Flange steel$A_s'$2–10M = 200 mm²
Stirrups$A_v$ / $s$10M double leg = 200 mm² @ 300 mm
Materials$f_c'$ / $f_y$30 MPa / 400 MPa

Find. The factored moment resistance $M_r$ and the factored shear resistance $V_r$ of the section.

10M @ 3002-10M2-25M100400300b(eff) = 1300 mmAll dimensions in mm; slab reinforcement not shown
Figure 4 — B1 Tee section with the effective flange width established in step 1. Bar positions as dimensioned on page 3.

Check: stem depth. On the original drawing the stem dimension is lettered “4m” while every other dimension on the same figure is in millimetres (100 mm slab, 300 mm stem width). A 4 m deep stem on a 300 mm web spanning 5 m is not a buildable member and is inconsistent with the 2–25M / 10M @ 300 detailing shown. 400 mm has been adopted, giving an overall depth of 500 mm, which is the only reading consistent with the rest of the figure. Note 1 on page 1 expressly invites this kind of stated assumption. Had 4000 mm been intended, $M_r$ would rise to roughly 1500 kN·m and $V_r$ to about 1400 kN, but the section would then be a deep girder rather than the one-way floor beam the question describes.

Approach. Establish the effective flange width from A23.3 Cl. 10.3.3, solve force equilibrium by strain compatibility to locate the neutral axis, take moments to get $M_r$, then apply the general shear method of Cl. 11.3 with the minimum-stirrup value of $\beta$.

  1. Establish the effective flange width. For a symmetrical interior Tee, A23.3 Cl. 10.3.3 limits the overhang each side to the least of one tenth of the span, half the clear distance to the next web, and twelve slab thicknesses: $$b_{oh}=\min\left(\frac{5000}{10},\ \frac{2000-300}{2},\ 12(100)\right)=\min(500,\ 850,\ 1200)=500\ \text{mm}$$ $$b_{eff}=300+2(500)=\boxed{1300\ \text{mm}}$$ The span controls, as it usually does on short-span floor framing.
  2. Set up the section geometry. With 40 mm cover, 10M stirrups and 25M bars, $$d=500-40-11.3-\frac{25.2}{2}=436\ \text{mm},\qquad d'=40+11.3+\frac{11.3}{2}=57\ \text{mm}$$ The stress-block parameters at 30 MPa are $\alpha_1=0.85-0.0015(30)=0.805$ and $\beta_1=0.97-0.0025(30)=0.895$.
  3. Locate the neutral axis by force equilibrium. Assume the block lies within the flange, so the compression width is $b_{eff}$. Ignoring the flange bars for a first pass, $$T=\phi_sA_sf_y=0.85(1000)(400)=340\ \text{kN}$$ $$a=\frac{T}{\alpha_1\phi_cf_c'b_{eff}}=\frac{340\times10^{3}}{0.805(0.65)(30)(1300)}=16.7\ \text{mm}\ \ll\ h_f=100\ \text{mm}$$ The assumption holds — the voids of the Tee are irrelevant and the section behaves as a 1300 mm wide rectangle.
  4. Include the flange bars, which are in tension. The neutral axis at $c=a/\beta_1=18.6$ mm sits well above the 2–10M at $d'=57$ mm, so those bars are on the tension side and add to $T$ rather than to $C$. Re-solving equilibrium with both layers gives $$c=22.4\ \text{mm},\qquad a=\beta_1c=20.0\ \text{mm}$$ with the 10M bars at a strain of $0.0035(57-22.4)/22.4=0.0054$, comfortably yielded in tension.
  5. Take moments for the resistance. Summing about the centroid of the compression block, $$M_r=\phi_sA_sf_y\left(d-\frac{a}{2}\right)+\phi_sA_s'f_y\left(d'-\frac{a}{2}\right)$$ $$M_r=340\times10^{3}(436-10.0)+68\times10^{3}(57-10.0)=\boxed{148.1\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}}$$ Ignoring the flange bars would give 145.4 kN·m, so they are worth 1.8 % — small, but the sign of their contribution is the instructive part.
  6. Confirm minimum steel and ductility. For a flanged section in sagging, A23.3 Cl. 10.5.1.2 uses $b_t=b_w$: $$A_{s,\min}=\frac{0.2\sqrt{f_c'}}{f_y}b_wh=\frac{0.2\sqrt{30}}{400}(300)(500)=411\ \text{mm}^2\ <\ 1000\ \text{mm}^2\quad\checkmark$$ With $c/d=22.4/436=0.051$, the section is emphatically tension-controlled: it will yield and deflect visibly long before the concrete crushes.
  7. Compute the concrete contribution to shear. The effective shear depth is $$d_v=\max(0.9d,\ 0.72h)=\max(392.5,\ 360)=392.5\ \text{mm}$$ Minimum transverse steel is satisfied, $A_{v,\min}=0.06\sqrt{f_c'}b_ws/f_y=73.9$ mm² against 200 mm² provided, so the simplified method permits $\beta=0.18$ and $\theta=35^{\circ}$: $$V_c=\phi_c\lambda\beta\sqrt{f_c'}\,b_wd_v=0.65(1.0)(0.18)\sqrt{30}(300)(392.5)=75.5\ \text{kN}$$
  8. Compute the stirrup contribution and total. $$V_s=\frac{\phi_sA_vf_yd_v\cot\theta}{s}=\frac{0.85(200)(400)(392.5)\cot 35^{\circ}}{300}=127.1\ \text{kN}$$ $$V_r=V_c+V_s=75.5+127.1=\boxed{202.6\ \text{kN}}$$
  9. Check the web-crushing cap. $$V_{r,\max}=0.25\phi_cf_c'b_wd_v=0.25(0.65)(30)(300)(392.5)=574\ \text{kN}\ >\ 202.6\ \text{kN}\quad\checkmark$$ Diagonal crushing does not govern, so the stirrups are fully effective.

The section resists 148 kN·m in bending and 203 kN in shear. For context, a 5 m simply supported span developing 148 kN·m corresponds to a uniform factored load of about 47 kN/m, at which the end shear would be 118 kN — comfortably inside the shear capacity. The Tee is therefore flexure-governed, which is the normal and desirable balance for a one-way floor system.

Check: stirrup spacing. The drawn spacing of 300 mm slightly exceeds the A23.3 Cl. 11.3.8.1 limit of $0.7d_v=275$ mm for this section. The resistance reported above is that of the section as drawn. Tightening the stirrups to 10M @ 275 mm satisfies the clause and raises $V_r$ to 214 kN; that is the detail that should be issued for construction.

Final results — B1
QuantityValue
Effective flange width $b_{eff}$1300 mm
Effective depth $d$436 mm
Neutral axis $c$ / block $a$22.4 mm / 20.0 mm
Moment resistance $M_r$148.1 kN·m
$V_c$ / $V_s$75.5 kN / 127.1 kN
Shear resistance $V_r$202.6 kN
Web-crushing cap574 kN (not critical)