16-Civ-A3 Elementary Environmental Engineering · May 2017
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Paper format. National Exams, May 2017 — 16-Civ-A3 Elementary Environmental Engineering. Three hours; closed book with one candidate-prepared 8½ × 11 double-sided aid sheet; approved Casio or Sharp calculator only. Seven problems are printed, each worth 20 marks, and any five constitute a complete paper (maximum 100 marks). All seven are solved here, because the set is intended as a study resource rather than an exam script. Section marks are shown in brackets at the left margin of each question and are reproduced below.
Reference texts.
Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.
Given. A completely stirred tank reactor removing ferrous iron by second-order oxidation, with the data below.
| Quantity | Symbol | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Rate constant (2nd order) | $k$ | 5000 M−¹s−¹ |
| Inlet concentration | $C_0$ | $10\ \mu\text{M}=1.0\times10^{-5}$ M |
| Outlet (target) concentration | $C$ | $5\ \mu\text{M}=5.0\times10^{-6}$ M |
| Volumetric flow | $Q$ | 1 m³/s |
Find. The mean residence time $t=\tau$ (in minutes) and the CSTR volume $V$.
Approach. Write a steady-state mass balance on Fe2+ around the well-mixed tank; because the tank is completely mixed, the reaction proceeds everywhere at the exit concentration.
| Quantity | CSTR | Batch / PFR (hint) |
|---|---|---|
| Mean residence time | 40 s = 0.667 min | 20 s |
| Reactor volume ($Q=1$ m³/s) | 40 m³ | 20 m³ |
Given. A pseudo-first-order decomposition of CHP in a CSTR: $k=4$ hr−¹, $Q=30$ m³/hr, target conversion $X=0.90$.
Find. The CSTR volume $V$ for 90% conversion at steady state.
Approach. Apply the steady-state CSTR balance for a first-order reaction, again evaluated at the exit concentration $C=C_0(1-X)$.
| Quantity | CSTR | PFR (comparison) |
|---|---|---|
| Residence time for $X=0.90$ | 2.25 hr | 0.576 hr |
| Reactor volume ($Q=30$ m³/hr) | 67.5 m³ | 17.3 m³ |
Disinfection removes the infectivity of waterborne pathogens (bacteria such as E. coli, protozoan cysts, viruses) rather than physically removing the organisms. Taking chlorine as the selected agent: when chlorine gas or hypochlorite is added to water it hydrolyses to hypochlorous acid, $\text{Cl}_2+\text{H}_2\text{O}\rightleftharpoons \text{HOCl}+\text{H}^{+}+\text{Cl}^{-}$, and HOCl dissociates to the hypochlorite ion, $\text{HOCl}\rightleftharpoons \text{H}^{+}+\text{OCl}^{-}$. The small, neutral HOCl molecule penetrates the cell wall and oxidises enzymes, membrane proteins and nucleic acids, destroying the metabolic machinery the organism needs to reproduce. Because HOCl is a far stronger disinfectant than OCl−, effectiveness falls sharply as pH rises above about 7.5.
The controlling design variable is the product of concentration and contact time, the CT concept: the log-inactivation achieved is governed by $CT=C\cdot t$, where $C$ is the residual disinfectant concentration (the "dose" $D$ available at the pathogen) and $t$ is the contact time in the disinfection basin. Chick–Watson kinetics express this as $\ln(N/N_0)=-\Lambda\,C^{\,n}\,t$, so a higher residual, a longer contact time, or both, increase the kill. In practice regulators publish required $CT$ values for each target log-removal, pathogen, temperature and pH (for example, Health Canada’s GCDWQ and the U.S. EPA Surface Water Treatment Rule tables). A plant meets its treatment goal by holding a defined residual through a baffled contact chamber sized for a known $t_{10}$ contact time; raising the dose lets the basin be smaller, while a larger basin lets the dose be lower — the two are traded against one another at a fixed $CT$. Chlorine additionally provides a lasting residual into the distribution system, which UV cannot, at the cost of taste, odour and disinfection by-product (trihalomethane) formation.