NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

16-Civ-A4 Geotechnical Materials and Analysis · December 2015

Question 6 of 6: Undrained strength beneath an embankment from Skempton pore pressures

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

Paper format: National Examination 98-Civ-A4 Geotechnical Materials and Analysis — December 2015. Closed book, 3 hours, 100 marks. Six questions, answer all. Newmark and rectangular m–n influence charts and a formula sheet are provided at the back of the paper.

Reference texts: Das & Sobhan, Principles of Geotechnical Engineering (Cengage); Knappett & Craig, Craig’s Soil Mechanics; Holtz, Kovacs & Sheahan, An Introduction to Geotechnical Engineering. Canadian practice: effective-stress, seepage and consolidation methods as summarised in the Canadian Foundation Engineering Manual (CFEM, 4th ed.).

Question 6: Undrained strength beneath an embankment from Skempton pore pressures (20 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given. Fill density $\rho_{fill}=1.7$ Mg/m3; foundation soil $c'=50$ kPa, $\phi'=21^\circ$; Skempton $A=0.2$, $B=0.98$; fill raised from 3 m to 6 m undrained; lateral stress increase $=\tfrac12$ vertical increase.

Given data
QuantityValue
Fill unit weight, $\gamma_{fill}=\rho g$16.68 kN/m3
Additional fill height6 − 3 = 3 m
Effective cohesion, $c'$50 kPa
Effective friction angle, $\phi'$21°
Skempton $A$, $B$0.2, 0.98

Find. The undrained shear strength $s_u$ of the foundation soil below the embankment centre immediately after raising the fill; and whether the soil is normally or over-consolidated.

Foundation soil: c'=50 kPa, φ'=21°, ρ=1.6 Mg/m³stage 1: 3 mfinal fill 6 m, ρ=1.7 Mg/m³centre
Figure 6.1 — embankment raised from 3 m (stage 1, consolidated) to 6 m; strength assessed below the centre.

Approach. Compute the vertical stress increase from the added fill, take the horizontal increase as one-half of it, obtain the excess pore pressure from Skempton’s equation, then find the effective vertical stress just after loading and the corresponding undrained shear strength from the effective-stress envelope.

  1. Fill unit weight and vertical stress increase. With $\gamma_{fill}=(1.7)(9.81)=16.68\ \text{kN/m}^3$ and 3 m of new fill, $$\Delta\sigma_1 = \gamma_{fill}\,\Delta h = (16.68)(3) = 50.0\ \text{kPa}.$$
  2. Horizontal stress increase. As instructed, the lateral increase is half the vertical: $$\Delta\sigma_3 = \tfrac12\,\Delta\sigma_1 = 25.0\ \text{kPa}.$$
  3. Excess pore pressure (Skempton). $$\Delta u = B\big[\Delta\sigma_3 + A(\Delta\sigma_1 - \Delta\sigma_3)\big] = 0.98\big[25.0 + 0.2(25.0)\big] = 0.98(30.0) = \boxed{29.4\ \text{kPa}}.$$
  4. Effective vertical stress just after loading. Following the standard treatment of this problem (Craig), the pore pressure is taken as zero at the start of the raise, i.e. the first 3 m of fill is treated as consolidated, and the stated negligible dissipation applies to the pore pressure generated by the 3 m to 6 m raise. Only that excess $\Delta u$ is acting. The total vertical stress from the full 6 m fill (taken at the foundation surface below the centre) is $(16.68)(6)=100.1$ kPa, hence $$\sigma'_v = 100.1 - 29.4 = 70.6\ \text{kPa}.$$
  5. Undrained shear strength. On the (approximately horizontal) shear surface below the centre, the effective-stress envelope gives $$s_u = c' + \sigma'_v\tan\phi' = 50 + (70.6)\tan 21^\circ = 50 + 27.1 = \boxed{77.1\ \text{kPa}}.$$
  6. Normally or over-consolidated? The soil is over-consolidated. Two independent indicators agree: (a) the effective-stress envelope has a real cohesion intercept $c' = 50$ kPa — a normally consolidated clay has $c'\approx0$ (envelope through the origin); and (b) the pore-pressure parameter $A = 0.2$ is low ($<0.5$), the dilatant signature of an over-consolidated soil, whereas a NC clay gives $A_f \approx 0.5$–$1.0$.
Final results — Question 6
QuantityValue
Vertical stress increase, $\Delta\sigma_1$50.0 kPa
Horizontal stress increase, $\Delta\sigma_3$25.0 kPa
Excess pore pressure, $\Delta u$29.4 kPa
Effective vertical stress, $\sigma'_v$70.6 kPa
Undrained shear strength, $s_u$77.1 kPa
Consolidation stateover-consolidated
Check: The strength point is taken at the foundation surface below the centre with the water table at that surface ($u_0=0$), so the only pore pressure is the excess $\Delta u$; the first 3 m of fill is assumed fully consolidated before the raise; and the normal stress on the shear surface is approximated by $\sigma'_v$. On these standard assumptions $s_u = c' + \sigma'_v\tan\phi' = 77.1$ kPa. The foundation density $\rho=1.6$ Mg/m3 is not needed for the load, which is carried by the fill. Alternative reading: if “negligible dissipation during the stages” is taken to mean that the pore pressure from the first 3 m has not dissipated either, then $\Delta\sigma_1 = 100.1$ kPa, $\Delta\sigma_3 = 50.0$ kPa, $\Delta u = 0.98[50.0 + 0.2(50.0)] = 58.8$ kPa, $\sigma'_v = 41.2$ kPa and $s_u = 50 + 41.2\tan 21^\circ = 65.8$ kPa. The over-consolidated verdict is unchanged.
Back to the paper →