16-Civ-A4 Geotechnical Materials and Analysis · December 2015
Question 6 of 6: Undrained strength beneath an embankment from Skempton pore pressures
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format: National Examination 98-Civ-A4 Geotechnical Materials and Analysis — December 2015. Closed book, 3 hours, 100 marks. Six questions, answer all. Newmark and rectangular m–n influence charts and a formula sheet are provided at the back of the paper.
Reference texts: Das & Sobhan, Principles of Geotechnical Engineering (Cengage); Knappett & Craig, Craig’s Soil Mechanics; Holtz, Kovacs & Sheahan, An Introduction to Geotechnical Engineering. Canadian practice: effective-stress, seepage and consolidation methods as summarised in the Canadian Foundation Engineering Manual (CFEM, 4th ed.).
Question 6: Undrained strength beneath an embankment from Skempton pore pressures (20 marks)
Given. Fill density $\rho_{fill}=1.7$ Mg/m3; foundation soil $c'=50$ kPa, $\phi'=21^\circ$; Skempton $A=0.2$, $B=0.98$; fill raised from 3 m to 6 m undrained; lateral stress increase $=\tfrac12$ vertical increase.
Given data
Quantity
Value
Fill unit weight, $\gamma_{fill}=\rho g$
16.68 kN/m3
Additional fill height
6 − 3 = 3 m
Effective cohesion, $c'$
50 kPa
Effective friction angle, $\phi'$
21°
Skempton $A$, $B$
0.2, 0.98
Find. The undrained shear strength $s_u$ of the foundation soil below the embankment centre immediately after raising the fill; and whether the soil is normally or over-consolidated.
Figure 6.1 — embankment raised from 3 m (stage 1, consolidated) to 6 m; strength assessed below the centre.
Approach. Compute the vertical stress increase from the added fill, take the horizontal increase as one-half of it, obtain the excess pore pressure from Skempton’s equation, then find the effective vertical stress just after loading and the corresponding undrained shear strength from the effective-stress envelope.
Fill unit weight and vertical stress increase. With $\gamma_{fill}=(1.7)(9.81)=16.68\ \text{kN/m}^3$ and 3 m of new fill,
$$\Delta\sigma_1 = \gamma_{fill}\,\Delta h = (16.68)(3) = 50.0\ \text{kPa}.$$
Horizontal stress increase. As instructed, the lateral increase is half the vertical:
$$\Delta\sigma_3 = \tfrac12\,\Delta\sigma_1 = 25.0\ \text{kPa}.$$
Effective vertical stress just after loading. Following the standard treatment of this problem (Craig), the pore pressure is taken as zero at the start of the raise, i.e. the first 3 m of fill is treated as consolidated, and the stated negligible dissipation applies to the pore pressure generated by the 3 m to 6 m raise. Only that excess $\Delta u$ is acting. The total vertical stress from the full 6 m fill (taken at the foundation surface below the centre) is $(16.68)(6)=100.1$ kPa, hence
$$\sigma'_v = 100.1 - 29.4 = 70.6\ \text{kPa}.$$
Undrained shear strength. On the (approximately horizontal) shear surface below the centre, the effective-stress envelope gives
$$s_u = c' + \sigma'_v\tan\phi' = 50 + (70.6)\tan 21^\circ = 50 + 27.1 = \boxed{77.1\ \text{kPa}}.$$
Normally or over-consolidated? The soil is over-consolidated. Two independent indicators agree: (a) the effective-stress envelope has a real cohesion intercept $c' = 50$ kPa — a normally consolidated clay has $c'\approx0$ (envelope through the origin); and (b) the pore-pressure parameter $A = 0.2$ is low ($<0.5$), the dilatant signature of an over-consolidated soil, whereas a NC clay gives $A_f \approx 0.5$–$1.0$.
Final results — Question 6
Quantity
Value
Vertical stress increase, $\Delta\sigma_1$
50.0 kPa
Horizontal stress increase, $\Delta\sigma_3$
25.0 kPa
Excess pore pressure, $\Delta u$
29.4 kPa
Effective vertical stress, $\sigma'_v$
70.6 kPa
Undrained shear strength, $s_u$
77.1 kPa
Consolidation state
over-consolidated
Check: The strength point is taken at the foundation surface below the centre with the water table at that surface ($u_0=0$), so the only pore pressure is the excess $\Delta u$; the first 3 m of fill is assumed fully consolidated before the raise; and the normal stress on the shear surface is approximated by $\sigma'_v$. On these standard assumptions $s_u = c' + \sigma'_v\tan\phi' = 77.1$ kPa. The foundation density $\rho=1.6$ Mg/m3 is not needed for the load, which is carried by the fill. Alternative reading: if “negligible dissipation during the stages” is taken to mean that the pore pressure from the first 3 m has not dissipated either, then $\Delta\sigma_1 = 100.1$ kPa, $\Delta\sigma_3 = 50.0$ kPa, $\Delta u = 0.98[50.0 + 0.2(50.0)] = 58.8$ kPa, $\sigma'_v = 41.2$ kPa and $s_u = 50 + 41.2\tan 21^\circ = 65.8$ kPa. The over-consolidated verdict is unchanged.