NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

16-Civ-A5 Hydraulic Engineering · May 2014

Question 1 of 6: Branched Distribution Network — Pressure Heads

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

Paper: National Exams — 98-Civ-A5 Hydraulic Engineering, May 2014. 3 hours, closed book (one aid sheet). Six questions of equal value (20 marks each); candidates complete any five, and all six are solved here as a study resource.

Reference texts. Mays, Water Resources Engineering, 3rd ed. (pipe networks, valves, pumps); Chow, Open-Channel Hydraulics (Manning uniform flow, hydraulic jump, gutter flow); Crowe, Elger & Roberson, Engineering Fluid Mechanics (pipe force balance, wall shear). Exam-supplied relations used throughout: Hazen–Williams $Q=0.278\,C\,D^{2.63}\,S^{0.54}$ with $S=h_f/L$ (SI), Manning $Q=\tfrac{1}{n}A\,R^{2/3}\,S^{1/2}$, Darcy–Weisbach $\Delta h=0.0826\,\tfrac{fL}{D^5}Q^2$, and $\text{TDH}=H_s+H_f$. Unless stated, local losses and velocity head are neglected and water has $\rho=1000\ \text{kg/m}^3$, $\nu=1.31\times10^{-6}\ \text{m}^2/\text{s}$.

Question 1: Branched Distribution Network — Pressure Heads (20 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given. Reservoir R1 water level 110 m; all five demand nodes at ground elevation 45 m; every pipe ductile iron with $C=115$, $D=452\ \text{mm}=0.452\ \text{m}$, $L=200\ \text{m}$; base demand $1.0\ \text{L/s}$ at each of N1–N5; fire flow $33\ \text{L/s}$ added at N5.

Find. Steady-state pressure head at Node 4 (max day + fire) and at Node 5 (max day only).

R1 (110 m)N1N2N3N4N5P1P3P5P4P7nodes at elev. 45 m; C=115, D=452 mm, L=200 m
Figure 1. Branched (tree) water-supply network. R1 feeds N1; the tree splits at N3 to N4 and to N2→N5. Arrows are nodal demands.

Approach. The network is a tree, so each pipe carries the sum of the demands downstream of it; compute each pipe head loss by Hazen–Williams and subtract cumulatively along the path from the reservoir, then pressure head = HGL − node elevation.

  1. Assign pipe flows by downstream demand (Case a, fire at N5). Tracing the tree, $Q_{P7}=Q_{N5}=1+33=34\ \text{L/s}$, $Q_{P4}=Q_{N2}+Q_{N5}=35\ \text{L/s}$, $Q_{P5}=Q_{N4}=1\ \text{L/s}$, $Q_{P3}=Q_{N3}+Q_{P4}+Q_{P5}=37\ \text{L/s}$, and $Q_{P1}=Q_{N1}+Q_{P3}=38\ \text{L/s}$ (equal to the total draw $5\times1+33$).
  2. Head loss per pipe. Inverting Hazen–Williams, $h_f=L\left(\dfrac{Q}{0.278\,C\,D^{2.63}}\right)^{1/0.54}$. With $0.278\,C\,D^{2.63}=3.86$ for this pipe, the path to Node 4 gives $h_{f,P1}=0.037\ \text{m}$ (38 L/s) and $h_{f,P3}=0.035\ \text{m}$ (37 L/s); $P5$ carries only 1 L/s so its loss is negligible ($\sim6\times10^{-5}\ \text{m}$).
  3. HGL march to Node 4. $H_{N1}=110-0.037=109.96\ \text{m}$, $H_{N3}=109.96-0.035=109.93\ \text{m}$, $H_{N4}=H_{N3}-h_{f,P5}\approx109.93\ \text{m}$.
  4. Pressure head at Node 4 (a). Subtract the ground elevation: $p_{N4}/\gamma=H_{N4}-45=\boxed{64.93\ \text{m}}$.
  5. Case b flows (no fire). Now all demands are 1 L/s: $Q_{P7}=1$, $Q_{P4}=2$, $Q_{P3}=4$, $Q_{P1}=5\ \text{L/s}$. These are so small that every head loss is at the millimetre level ($\sim1\text{--}2\ \text{mm}$ total to N5).
  6. Pressure head at Node 5 (b). $H_{N5}=110-\sum h_f\approx110.00\ \text{m}$, so $p_{N5}/\gamma=H_{N5}-45=\boxed{65.00\ \text{m}}$.
Question 1 results
QuantityValue
a) Pressure head at Node 4 (max day + fire)64.93 m
b) Pressure head at Node 5 (max day, no fire)65.00 m
Governing pipe flow $Q_{P1}$ (case a / case b)38 / 5 L/s
Check: the 452 mm mains are enormously oversized for these flows, so friction is a few centimetres at most and the pressure head is essentially the static lift $110-45=65\ \text{m}$ at every node. The fire flow at N5 only drops Node 4 by $\sim0.07\ \text{m}$.
← Paper overview