NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

16-Civ-A5 Hydraulic Engineering · May 2018

Question 1 of 6: Branched supply network — pipe length and pressure under fire flow

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

Paper: National Exams — 16-Civ-A5 Hydraulic Engineering — May 2018 · 3 hours · closed book (one aid sheet) · six questions, complete any five (all solved here) · each question 20 marks, equal-value parts.

Reference texts: Chin, Water-Resources Engineering (Pearson); Chow, Open-Channel Hydraulics (McGraw-Hill); Chaudhry, Open-Channel Flow (Springer); Munson, Young & Okiishi, Fundamentals of Fluid Mechanics (Wiley); Roberson, Cassidy & Chaudhry, Hydraulic Engineering.

Governing relations supplied on the exam cover sheet. Hazen–Williams $Q = 0.278\,C\,D^{2.63}\,S^{0.54}$ with slope $S=\Delta h/L$ (SI, $Q$ in m³/s, $D$ in m); Manning $Q=\tfrac{1}{n}A\,R^{2/3}\,S^{1/2}$; Darcy–Weisbach $\Delta h = 0.0826\,\tfrac{fL}{D^5}Q^2$; total dynamic head $TDH=H_s+H_f$. Unless stated, local losses and velocity head are neglected, diameters are nominal, and water has $\rho=1000\ \text{kg/m}^3$, $\nu=1.31\times10^{-6}\ \text{m}^2/\text{s}$.


Question 1: Branched supply network — pipe length and pressure under fire flow (20 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given. Reservoir R1 water level $H_{R1}=65\ \text{m}$; all demand nodes at ground elevation $z=20\ \text{m}$; PVC pipes $C=140$, $D=0.502\ \text{m}$, all of one common length $L$. Demands: nodes 1–5 each $1.5\ \text{L/s}$ (max day); node 5 additionally $20\ \text{L/s}$ fire flow.

Given data
QuantityValue
Reservoir head $H_{R1}$65 m
Node ground elevation $z$20 m
Diameter $D$ / roughness $C$0.502 m / 140
Max-day demand per node1.5 L/s
Fire flow at Node 520 L/s
Target pressure head at Node 5 (part a)40 m

Find. (a) the common pipe length $L$ that yields a 40 m pressure head at Node 5 under max-day + fire; (b) the pressure head at Node 4 when $C$ is lowered to 130 (same $L$, same flows).

P1P3P5P4P7N1N3N4N2N5R1Reservoir R1 water level 65 m; all nodes at elevation 20 m. Not to scale.
Figure 1. Branched (tree) supply network. Flow path to the fire node N5 is R1→P1→N1→P3→N3→P4→N2→P7→N5.

Approach. The network is a tree, so each pipe carries the sum of the demands downstream of it (no loops, no Hardy–Cross). Trace the hydraulic grade line (HGL) from R1 along the path to the target node; the total Hazen–Williams friction loss along that path fixes the unknown length in (a), and re-evaluating the same losses with the lower $C$ gives the Node-4 pressure in (b).

  1. Assign pipe flows by downstream demand. With total demand $\sum=5(1.5)+20=27.5\ \text{L/s}$, each pipe carries what lies beyond it toward the leaves: $$Q_{P1}=27.5,\quad Q_{P3}=26.0,\quad Q_{P4}=23.0,\quad Q_{P7}=21.5,\quad Q_{P5}=1.5\ \ (\text{L/s}).$$ The fire flow rides on every pipe of the supply path P1–P3–P4–P7 to N5.
  2. Write the Hazen–Williams loss per pipe. Inverting $Q=0.278\,C\,D^{2.63}S^{0.54}$ with $a\equiv 0.278\,C\,D^{2.63}=0.278(140)(0.502)^{2.63}=6.354$, $$h_{f,i}=\left(\frac{Q_i}{a}\right)^{1/0.54} L .$$
  3. Impose the Node-5 head constraint (part a). The pressure head at N5 is 40 m, so $HGL_{N5}=z+40=60\ \text{m}$ and the friction available from R1 is $\Delta H = 65-60 = 5\ \text{m}$ over the four path pipes: $$L\sum_{P1,P3,P4,P7}\!\left(\frac{Q_i}{a}\right)^{1/0.54}=5 .$$ Evaluating the sum $=1.3651\times10^{-4}\ \text{m}^{-1}$ gives $$\boxed{L=\frac{5}{1.3651\times10^{-4}}\approx 3.66\times10^{4}\ \text{m}\;(\approx 36.6\ \text{km per pipe}).}$$
  4. Re-evaluate to Node 4 with $C=130$ (part b). The demands (hence flows) are unchanged; only friction rises. The path to N4 is P1–P3–P5, so $$\Delta H_{N4}=\sum_{P1,P3,P5} \left(\frac{Q_i}{0.278(130)D^{2.63}}\right)^{1/0.54}L = 3.36\ \text{m}.$$ Then $HGL_{N4}=65-3.36=61.64\ \text{m}$ and $$\boxed{p_{N4}/\gamma = HGL_{N4}-z = 61.64-20 \approx 41.6\ \text{m}.}$$ (For reference, the same $C=130$ drops Node 5 to $65-5.74-20=39.3\ \text{m}$, just below its design 40 m.)
Check / realism. The flows are tiny for a 502 mm main — $V_{P1}=Q/A=0.0275/0.1979\approx0.14\ \text{m/s}$ — so dissipating even 5 m of head demands a very long line ($\approx36.6$ km). The number follows directly from the stated 40 m target; in practice such a low velocity would prompt a smaller transmission diameter, but the exam fixes $D=502$ mm and the 40 m head, so $L$ is large by construction.
Question 1 — results
QuantityValue
(a) Common pipe length $L$≈ 36,600 m (36.6 km)
(b) Pressure head at Node 4, $C=130$≈ 41.6 m
Pipe flows P1 / P3 / P4 / P7 / P527.5 / 26.0 / 23.0 / 21.5 / 1.5 L/s
← Paper overview