Question 1 of 6: Branched supply network — pipe length and pressure under fire flow
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper: National Exams — 16-Civ-A5 Hydraulic Engineering — May 2018 · 3 hours · closed book (one aid sheet) · six questions, complete any five (all solved here) · each question 20 marks, equal-value parts.
Governing relations supplied on the exam cover sheet. Hazen–Williams $Q = 0.278\,C\,D^{2.63}\,S^{0.54}$ with slope $S=\Delta h/L$ (SI, $Q$ in m³/s, $D$ in m); Manning $Q=\tfrac{1}{n}A\,R^{2/3}\,S^{1/2}$; Darcy–Weisbach $\Delta h = 0.0826\,\tfrac{fL}{D^5}Q^2$; total dynamic head $TDH=H_s+H_f$. Unless stated, local losses and velocity head are neglected, diameters are nominal, and water has $\rho=1000\ \text{kg/m}^3$, $\nu=1.31\times10^{-6}\ \text{m}^2/\text{s}$.
Question 1: Branched supply network — pipe length and pressure under fire flow (20 marks)
Given. Reservoir R1 water level $H_{R1}=65\ \text{m}$; all demand nodes at ground elevation $z=20\ \text{m}$; PVC pipes $C=140$, $D=0.502\ \text{m}$, all of one common length $L$. Demands: nodes 1–5 each $1.5\ \text{L/s}$ (max day); node 5 additionally $20\ \text{L/s}$ fire flow.
Given data
Quantity
Value
Reservoir head $H_{R1}$
65 m
Node ground elevation $z$
20 m
Diameter $D$ / roughness $C$
0.502 m / 140
Max-day demand per node
1.5 L/s
Fire flow at Node 5
20 L/s
Target pressure head at Node 5 (part a)
40 m
Find. (a) the common pipe length $L$ that yields a 40 m pressure head at Node 5 under max-day + fire; (b) the pressure head at Node 4 when $C$ is lowered to 130 (same $L$, same flows).
Figure 1. Branched (tree) supply network. Flow path to the fire node N5 is R1→P1→N1→P3→N3→P4→N2→P7→N5.
Approach. The network is a tree, so each pipe carries the sum of the demands downstream of it (no loops, no Hardy–Cross). Trace the hydraulic grade line (HGL) from R1 along the path to the target node; the total Hazen–Williams friction loss along that path fixes the unknown length in (a), and re-evaluating the same losses with the lower $C$ gives the Node-4 pressure in (b).
Assign pipe flows by downstream demand. With total demand $\sum=5(1.5)+20=27.5\ \text{L/s}$, each pipe carries what lies beyond it toward the leaves:
$$Q_{P1}=27.5,\quad Q_{P3}=26.0,\quad Q_{P4}=23.0,\quad Q_{P7}=21.5,\quad Q_{P5}=1.5\ \ (\text{L/s}).$$
The fire flow rides on every pipe of the supply path P1–P3–P4–P7 to N5.
Write the Hazen–Williams loss per pipe. Inverting $Q=0.278\,C\,D^{2.63}S^{0.54}$ with $a\equiv 0.278\,C\,D^{2.63}=0.278(140)(0.502)^{2.63}=6.354$,
$$h_{f,i}=\left(\frac{Q_i}{a}\right)^{1/0.54} L .$$
Impose the Node-5 head constraint (part a). The pressure head at N5 is 40 m, so $HGL_{N5}=z+40=60\ \text{m}$ and the friction available from R1 is $\Delta H = 65-60 = 5\ \text{m}$ over the four path pipes:
$$L\sum_{P1,P3,P4,P7}\!\left(\frac{Q_i}{a}\right)^{1/0.54}=5 .$$
Evaluating the sum $=1.3651\times10^{-4}\ \text{m}^{-1}$ gives
$$\boxed{L=\frac{5}{1.3651\times10^{-4}}\approx 3.66\times10^{4}\ \text{m}\;(\approx 36.6\ \text{km per pipe}).}$$
Re-evaluate to Node 4 with $C=130$ (part b). The demands (hence flows) are unchanged; only friction rises. The path to N4 is P1–P3–P5, so
$$\Delta H_{N4}=\sum_{P1,P3,P5} \left(\frac{Q_i}{0.278(130)D^{2.63}}\right)^{1/0.54}L = 3.36\ \text{m}.$$
Then $HGL_{N4}=65-3.36=61.64\ \text{m}$ and
$$\boxed{p_{N4}/\gamma = HGL_{N4}-z = 61.64-20 \approx 41.6\ \text{m}.}$$
(For reference, the same $C=130$ drops Node 5 to $65-5.74-20=39.3\ \text{m}$, just below its design 40 m.)
Check / realism. The flows are tiny for a 502 mm main — $V_{P1}=Q/A=0.0275/0.1979\approx0.14\ \text{m/s}$ — so dissipating even 5 m of head demands a very long line ($\approx36.6$ km). The number follows directly from the stated 40 m target; in practice such a low velocity would prompt a smaller transmission diameter, but the exam fixes $D=502$ mm and the 40 m head, so $L$ is large by construction.