NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

16-Civ-A6 Highway Design, Construction, and Maintenance · December 2017

Question 2 of 7: Exit-ramp curve adequacy and sight clearance

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

Paper format. National Examinations, December 2017, 16-Civ-A6 — Highway Design, Construction and Maintenance. Seven questions of equal value (20 marks each), three hours, closed book with one hand-written aid sheet and five pages of attached tables and charts. Only the first five solutions are marked, but because this set is a study resource all seven questions are solved here. Unless a question states otherwise, the perception–reaction time is taken as $t_{pr}=2.5\ \text{s}$ (AASHTO design value) under NOTE 2 on page 1, and $g=9.81\ \text{m/s}^2$.

Reference texts.

Question 2: Exit-ramp curve adequacy and sight clearance (20 marks — (a) 10, (b) 10)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given data (Question 2)
QuantitySymbolValue
Radius to the inner edge$R_i$80 m
Lane width (single lane)$w$4.0 m
Superelevation rate$e$0.06
Deflection angle (from the figure)$\Delta$$90^\circ$
Elevation at the PC—103 m
Elevation at the PT—100 m
Ramp design speed$V$40 km/h
Perception–reaction time$t_{pr}$3.5 s

Given. A one-lane exit ramp curves through $90^\circ$ on an 80 m inner-edge radius with $e=0.06$, falling 3 m from PC to PT, designed for 40 km/h with a 3.5 s perception–reaction time.

Find. (a) whether the curve would serve a 60 km/h design speed; (b) the width that must be cleared inside the inner edge at 40 km/h.

Freeway Arterial O R = 80 m (inner edge) Δ = 90° sight chord = SSD Mₛ = 4.82 m clear 2.82 m inside the edge PC elev 103 m PT elev 100 m Single 4 m lane; the travelled path (dashed green) is half a lane outside the inner edge.
Plan of the exit ramp. The figure on page 3 of the examination marks $90^\circ$ between the freeway tangent at the PC and the arterial tangent at the PT, so $\Delta=90^\circ$.

Approach. Move the radius from the inner edge to the travelled path, compare the radius 60 km/h needs with what exists, then build the 40 km/h sight distance on the actual ramp grade and convert it into a middle ordinate re-datumed to the inner edge.

  1. Place the vehicle on its travelled path. The 80 m is quoted to the inner edge, and a vehicle in a single 4.0 m lane runs down the middle of it, so the design path radius is $$ R_v=R_i+\tfrac{w}{2}=80+2.0=82.0\ \text{m}. $$
  2. Ask what radius 60 km/h would need. From the friction table $f_s=0.15$ at 60 km/h, and $V_0=16.667\ \text{m/s}$: $$ R_{req}=\frac{V_0^{2}}{g\,(f_s+e)}=\frac{16.667^{2}}{9.81(0.15+0.06)} =\boxed{134.84\ \text{m}} $$ which is far more than the 82.0 m the ramp provides, so the curve is not adequate for a 60 km/h design speed.
  3. Show the shortfall as a friction demand, which is how a reviewer will judge it. Rearranging the same relation for the side friction the curve would actually call on, $$ f_{s,demand}=\frac{V_0^{2}}{g R_v}-e=\frac{16.667^{2}}{9.81(82.0)}-0.06 =0.2853, $$ nearly twice the 0.15 that a 60 km/h pavement can be relied on to supply. Checking the tabulated speeds downwards, 50 km/h needs 89.38 m (still too much) while 40 km/h needs only 54.72 m, so the ramp is correctly signed for its stated 40 km/h design speed and nothing higher.
  4. Recover the ramp grade from the two elevations. The curve length along the travelled path is $$ L=\frac{\pi\Delta R_v}{180}=\frac{\pi(90)(82.0)}{180}=128.81\ \text{m}, $$ and the 3 m fall from PC to PT spreads over that length, so $$ G=\frac{100-103}{128.81}=-0.02329\quad(-2.329\ \%). $$
  5. Compute the stopping sight distance the ramp must provide. With $f=0.38$ at 40 km/h, $V_0=11.111\ \text{m/s}$ and the stipulated $t_{pr}=3.5$ s on the downgrade, $$ \text{SSD}=\frac{V_0^{2}}{2g(f+G)}+V_0t_{pr} =\frac{11.111^{2}}{2(9.81)(0.38-0.02329)}+11.111(3.5) $$ $$ =17.64+38.89=\boxed{56.53\ \text{m}} $$ Note how the long 3.5 s reaction dominates: it alone accounts for 38.89 m of the 56.53 m.
  6. Turn the sight distance into a middle ordinate. Everything inside that offset must be cleared of obstructions: $$ M_s=R_v-R_v\cos\!\left[\frac{90\,\text{SSD}}{\pi R_v}\right] =82.0\left[1-\cos(19.749^{\circ})\right]=4.82\ \text{m}. $$
  7. Re-datum the offset to the inside edge, which is what the question asks for. $M_s$ is measured from the travelled path, and the inner edge lies half a lane inboard of it, so $$ \text{clearance from the inside edge}=M_s-\tfrac{w}{2}=4.82-2.00 =\boxed{2.82\ \text{m}} $$ A strip about 2.8 m wide inside the inner edge, held over the whole $90^\circ$ arc, must be kept free of barriers, sign structures, noise walls and vegetation taller than about 0.6 m.

Check: the deflection angle is not stated in the text of Question 2; it is taken as $\Delta=90^\circ$ from the $90^\circ$ marked on the page-3 figure between the freeway and the arterial. The grade is treated as uniform over the curve, which is what a single pair of PC and PT elevations can support, and the descending direction is used because it governs braking.

Question 2 — final results
QuantityResult
Travelled-path radius$R_v=82.0$ m
(a) Radius required at 60 km/h134.84 m
(a) Side friction demanded at 60 km/h0.285 against 0.15 available
(a) VerdictNot adequate for 60 km/h; 40 km/h is the highest tabulated speed the curve supports
Curve length and grade$L=128.81$ m, $G=-2.329$ %
(b) Stopping sight distance at 40 km/h56.53 m
(b) Middle ordinate from the travelled path$M_s=4.82$ m
(b) Width to be cleared inside the inner edge2.82 m