16-Civ-A6 Highway Design, Construction, and Maintenance · December 2017
Question 2 of 7: Exit-ramp curve adequacy and sight clearance
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. National Examinations, December
2017, 16-Civ-A6 — Highway Design, Construction and Maintenance. Seven
questions of equal value (20 marks each), three hours, closed book with one
hand-written aid sheet and five pages of attached tables and charts. Only the
first five solutions are marked, but because this set is a study resource
all seven questions are solved here. Unless a question states
otherwise, the perception–reaction time is taken as
$t_{pr}=2.5\ \text{s}$ (AASHTO design value) under NOTE 2 on page 1, and
$g=9.81\ \text{m/s}^2$.
Reference texts.
Garber, N.J. and Hoel, L.A., Traffic and Highway Engineering,
5th ed. — Ch. 3 (driver/vehicle characteristics and stopping sight
distance), Ch. 15 (geometric design of highway facilities), Ch. 20 (design of
flexible highway pavements).
AASHTO, Guide for Design of Pavement Structures, 1993 —
Part II Ch. 2 (flexible pavement design), Appendix D (axle-load equivalency
factors). The tables reproduced on pages 6–8 of the examination are
Tables 4.2, 4.3 and 4.5 of Garber & Hoel, taken from this guide.
AASHTO, A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets
(Green Book), 7th ed. — Ch. 3 (sight distance, horizontal and vertical
alignment).
Transportation Association of Canada, Geometric Design Guide for
Canadian Roads — Ch. 1.2 (design controls), Ch. 2.1
(sight distance), Ch. 2.2 (horizontal alignment), Ch. 2.3 (vertical
alignment). This is the governing Canadian guide; its sight-distance and
minimum-radius models are the same ones the examination equation sheet
supplies.
Transportation Association of Canada, Pavement Asset Design and
Management Guide — the Canadian counterpart to the AASHTO 1993
structural-number procedure used in Questions 5 to 7.
Question 2: Exit-ramp curve adequacy and sight clearance (20 marks — (a) 10, (b) 10)
Given. A one-lane exit ramp curves through $90^\circ$ on an 80 m inner-edge radius with $e=0.06$, falling 3 m from PC to PT, designed for 40 km/h with a 3.5 s perception–reaction time.
Find. (a) whether the curve would serve a 60 km/h design speed; (b) the width that must be cleared inside the inner edge at 40 km/h.
Plan of the exit ramp. The figure on page 3 of the examination marks $90^\circ$ between the freeway tangent at the PC and the arterial tangent at the PT, so $\Delta=90^\circ$.
Approach. Move the radius from the inner edge to the travelled path, compare the radius 60 km/h needs with what exists, then build the 40 km/h sight distance on the actual ramp grade and convert it into a middle ordinate re-datumed to the inner edge.
Place the vehicle on its travelled path. The 80 m
is quoted to the inner edge, and a vehicle in a single 4.0 m lane runs down
the middle of it, so the design path radius is
$$ R_v=R_i+\tfrac{w}{2}=80+2.0=82.0\ \text{m}. $$
Ask what radius 60 km/h would need. From the
friction table $f_s=0.15$ at 60 km/h, and $V_0=16.667\ \text{m/s}$:
$$ R_{req}=\frac{V_0^{2}}{g\,(f_s+e)}=\frac{16.667^{2}}{9.81(0.15+0.06)}
=\boxed{134.84\ \text{m}} $$
which is far more than the 82.0 m the ramp provides, so the curve is
not adequate for a 60 km/h design speed.
Show the shortfall as a friction demand, which is how a
reviewer will judge it. Rearranging the same relation for the side
friction the curve would actually call on,
$$ f_{s,demand}=\frac{V_0^{2}}{g R_v}-e=\frac{16.667^{2}}{9.81(82.0)}-0.06
=0.2853, $$
nearly twice the 0.15 that a 60 km/h pavement can be relied on to supply.
Checking the tabulated speeds downwards, 50 km/h needs 89.38 m (still too
much) while 40 km/h needs only 54.72 m, so the ramp is correctly signed for
its stated 40 km/h design speed and nothing higher.
Recover the ramp grade from the two elevations.
The curve length along the travelled path is
$$ L=\frac{\pi\Delta R_v}{180}=\frac{\pi(90)(82.0)}{180}=128.81\ \text{m}, $$
and the 3 m fall from PC to PT spreads over that length, so
$$ G=\frac{100-103}{128.81}=-0.02329\quad(-2.329\ \%). $$
Compute the stopping sight distance the ramp must
provide. With $f=0.38$ at 40 km/h, $V_0=11.111\ \text{m/s}$ and the
stipulated $t_{pr}=3.5$ s on the downgrade,
$$ \text{SSD}=\frac{V_0^{2}}{2g(f+G)}+V_0t_{pr}
=\frac{11.111^{2}}{2(9.81)(0.38-0.02329)}+11.111(3.5) $$
$$ =17.64+38.89=\boxed{56.53\ \text{m}} $$
Note how the long 3.5 s reaction dominates: it alone accounts for 38.89 m of
the 56.53 m.
Turn the sight distance into a middle ordinate.
Everything inside that offset must be cleared of obstructions:
$$ M_s=R_v-R_v\cos\!\left[\frac{90\,\text{SSD}}{\pi R_v}\right]
=82.0\left[1-\cos(19.749^{\circ})\right]=4.82\ \text{m}. $$
Re-datum the offset to the inside edge, which is what the
question asks for. $M_s$ is measured from the travelled path, and the
inner edge lies half a lane inboard of it, so
$$ \text{clearance from the inside edge}=M_s-\tfrac{w}{2}=4.82-2.00
=\boxed{2.82\ \text{m}} $$
A strip about 2.8 m wide inside the inner edge, held over the whole
$90^\circ$ arc, must be kept free of barriers, sign structures, noise walls
and vegetation taller than about 0.6 m.
Check: the
deflection angle is not stated in the text of Question 2; it is taken as
$\Delta=90^\circ$ from the $90^\circ$ marked on the page-3 figure between the
freeway and the arterial. The grade is treated as uniform over the curve,
which is what a single pair of PC and PT elevations can support, and the
descending direction is used because it governs braking.
Question 2 — final results
Quantity
Result
Travelled-path radius
$R_v=82.0$ m
(a) Radius required at 60 km/h
134.84 m
(a) Side friction demanded at 60 km/h
0.285 against 0.15 available
(a) Verdict
Not adequate for 60 km/h; 40 km/h is the highest tabulated speed the curve supports