Question 5 of 9: Two-beam structure by Castigliano’s least-work theorem
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. 98-Civ-B1 Advanced Structural Analysis, National Examinations, May 2015 — three hours, closed book (an approved Sharp or Casio calculator is the only aid). Questions 1 and 2 are compulsory; the candidate then answers two of Questions 3, 4, 5, one of Questions 6, 7 and one of Questions 8, 9, so six questions totalling 100 marks constitute a complete paper. Marks are printed in the left margin. All nine questions are solved here, because the set is a study resource rather than an examination script.
Reference texts. R. C. Hibbeler, Structural Analysis (Pearson) — force/flexibility method, slope-deflection, moment distribution and influence lines; A. Kassimali, Structural Analysis (Cengage) — matrix stiffness formulation and support-settlement effects; J. C. McCormac, Structural Analysis: Using Classical and Matrix Methods (Wiley); CSA S16:19 Design of Steel Structures and CSA S6:19 Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code for the Canadian design setting in which these analyses are used.
Sign convention used throughout. Bending moments are reported as sagging positive and are plotted on the tension face of each member. Slope-deflection end moments follow the counter-clockwise-positive convention stated in Question 9: $$M_{ij}=\frac{2EI}{L}\left(2\theta_i+\theta_j-3\psi_{ij}\right)+M^{F}_{ij},\qquad \psi_{ij}=\frac{(\mathbf{D}_j-\mathbf{D}_i)\cdot \mathbf{e}_2}{L}$$ where $\mathbf{e}_2$ is the member axis rotated 90 degrees counter-clockwise, and the fixed-end moments of a downward uniform load are $M^{F}_{ij}=+wL^2/12$, $M^{F}_{ji}=-wL^2/12$. The sagging moment at the ends of a member is then $M(i)=-M_{ij}$ and $M(j)=+M_{ji}$.
Question 5: Two-beam structure by Castigliano’s least-work theorem (18 marks)
Given. Cantilever 1–2 of length $a=3\ \text{m}$ built in at joint 1;
beam 2–3 of length $L=6\ \text{m}$ built in at joint 3 and carrying $w=4\ \text{kN/m}$;
the two are connected at joint 2 by a roller, which transmits a vertical force only. Both members
have the same $EI$ and are inextensible.
Find. The interaction force at the roller, and the shear force and bending
moment diagrams of both beams with their maximum and minimum ordinates.
Question 5: the two-beam structure connected by a roller at joint 2.
Approach. The structure is one degree indeterminate; take the roller force $R$
as the redundant, write the total strain energy of the two beams in terms of $R$, and apply
$\partial U/\partial R=0$ (least work), which is the statement that the two tips deflect
together.
Degree of indeterminacy. Two built-in ends give six restraints and the roller
one internal force; with three equations of equilibrium available for each of the two free bodies,
$$\text{DSI}=(3+3+1)-(3+3)=\boxed{1}$$ so one redundant — the roller force $R$ — is
enough.
Internal moments in terms of the redundant. Measuring $s$ from the free end
of each member,
$$M_{12}(s)=-R\,s\quad (0\le s\le 3),\qquad
M_{23}(s)=R\,s-\tfrac{w s^{2}}{2}\quad (0\le s\le 6)$$
The cantilever is pushed down by the roller; beam 2–3 is held up by it.
Least work. With
$U=\int M^{2}\,ds/(2EI)$, Castigliano’s second theorem in its least-work form requires
$$\frac{\partial U}{\partial R}=\frac{1}{EI}\left[\int_0^{3}(-Rs)(-s)\,ds
+\int_0^{6}\left(Rs-\tfrac{w s^{2}}{2}\right)s\,ds\right]=0$$
because the roller is an internal redundant that does no net external work.
Evaluate the integrals.
$$\int_0^{3}R s^{2}\,ds=\frac{R\,3^{3}}{3}=9R,\qquad
\int_0^{6}R s^{2}\,ds=\frac{R\,6^{3}}{3}=72R,\qquad
\int_0^{6}\frac{w s^{3}}{2}\,ds=\frac{w\,6^{4}}{8}=648$$
so that
$$9R+72R-648=0\;\Longrightarrow\;R=\frac{648}{81}=\boxed{8\ \text{kN}}$$
Equivalently, the tip of the cantilever and the end of the propped beam must deflect equally:
$\dfrac{R a^{3}}{3EI}=\dfrac{wL^{4}}{8EI}-\dfrac{R L^{3}}{3EI}$.
Beam 1–2. It is a cantilever carrying the 8 kN roller reaction at its
tip:
$$V_{12}=8\ \text{kN}\ \text{(constant)},\qquad M_1=-8(3)=\boxed{-24\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}}$$
with the moment varying linearly to zero at the roller.
Beam 2–3. Measuring $x$ from joint 2,
$$V(x)=8-4x,\qquad M(x)=8x-2x^{2}$$
The shear vanishes at $x=2\ \text{m}$, where
$$M_{\max}=8(2)-2(2)^{2}=\boxed{+8\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}}$$
and at the built-in end
$$V_3=8-4(6)=-16\ \text{kN},\qquad M_3=8(6)-2(6)^{2}=\boxed{-24\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}}$$
Check. Total load $4(6)=24\ \text{kN}$ is carried as $8\ \text{kN}$ through
the cantilever and $16\ \text{kN}$ at joint 3; taking moments of the whole structure about joint 3
closes to zero. The two built-in ends happen to carry the same
$24\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}$, a coincidence of the 3 m : 6 m proportion, not a general
result.
Question 5: shear force and bending moment diagrams for both beams.
Question 5 — complete results
Quantity
Value
Roller (interaction) force
$R=8\ \text{kN}$
Beam 1–2 shear
$+8\ \text{kN}$ constant
Beam 1–2 moment
$-24\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}$ at joint 1, zero at joint 2
Beam 2–3 shear
$+8\ \text{kN}$ at joint 2 to $-16\ \text{kN}$ at joint 3