16-Civ-B1 Advanced Structural Analysis · December 2016
Question 1 of 9: Schematic Shear and Bending Moment Diagrams for Three Structures
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. National Examinations,
December 2016 — 98-Civ-B1 Advanced Structural Analysis. Three
hours, CLOSED BOOK (an approved Sharp or Casio calculator is permitted).
Questions 1 and 2 are compulsory (12 and 8 marks); the candidate then
answers TWO of Questions 3–5 (18 marks each) and TWO of
Questions 6–9 (22 marks each), so six questions constitute a complete
paper worth 100 marks. All nine questions are solved here,
because the set is intended as a study resource rather than as an exam script.
Reference texts. R. C. Hibbeler, Structural
Analysis, 10th ed. (Ch. 6 influence lines, Ch. 9 virtual work and
Castigliano's theorems, Ch. 10 force method, Ch. 11 slope-deflection,
Ch. 12 moment distribution, Ch. 16 stiffness method for frames);
A. Kassimali, Structural Analysis, 6th ed.; A. Ghali,
A. M. Neville & T. G. Brown, Structural Analysis: A Unified
Classical and Matrix Approach, 7th ed.; J. C. McCormac,
Structural Analysis: Using Classical and Matrix Methods, 4th ed.
Canadian design context for the same structures: CSA S16, CSA A23.3 and
the National Building Code of Canada 2020.
Sign convention used throughout.
Member-end moments follow the counter-clockwise-positive slope-deflection form
$M_{ij}=\dfrac{2EI}{L}\left(2\theta_i+\theta_j-3\psi_{ij}\right)+\mathrm{FEM}_{ij}$,
with the chord rotation $\psi_{ij}=\left[(\mathbf{D}_j-\mathbf{D}_i)\cdot
\mathbf{e}_2\right]/L$ and $\mathbf{e}_2$ the member axis turned
$+90^\circ$. For a downward uniformly distributed load on a horizontal member,
$\mathrm{FEM}_{ij}=+wL^{2}/12$ and $\mathrm{FEM}_{ji}=-wL^{2}/12$. Sagging
moments are recovered as $M_{\text{sag}}(i)=-M_{ij}$ and
$M_{\text{sag}}(j)=+M_{ji}$, and every bending-moment diagram is plotted on the
tension side of the member.
Question 1: Schematic Shear and Bending Moment Diagrams for Three Structures (12 marks)
Given. Three schematic structures, all members of
constant $EI$ and axially inextensible. Only structure (a) carries printed
dimensions (in multiples of $L$ and $w$); structures (b) and (c) are
dimensioned symbolically, so their ordinates are reported as closed forms in
$P$, $a$, $b$ (clear span), $h$ (column height) and the storey heights
$h_1,h_2$.
Find. The shear force and bending moment diagrams of
each structure, with the governing ordinates, the points of contraflexure and
the qualitative shape stated.
Approach. Count the degree of static indeterminacy,
exploit symmetry or anti-symmetry to collapse the unknowns, solve the reduced
compatibility (structure a) or slope-deflection (structures b and c) equations,
then plot $V$ and $M$ from statics.
Structure (a): two-degree indeterminate beam, and its shear force and bending moment diagrams. Sagging moment is plotted below the axis, on the tension side.
Structure (a) — classify and choose redundants. The
beam carries two roller reactions and a built-in end, so
$r=1+1+3=5$ against three equations of equilibrium: the beam is
$5-3=\boxed{2}$ degrees statically indeterminate. Taking the two roller
reactions $R_B$ and $R_C$ as redundants leaves a cantilever fixed at D as the
primary structure, and the compatibility conditions are simply that the
deflection vanishes at B and at C.
Solve the two compatibility equations. With
$f_{ij}=\int m_i m_j\,\mathrm{d}x/EI$ and $\Delta_{i0}=\int M_0
m_i\,\mathrm{d}x/EI$ evaluated over the full $7L/3$ length, the flexibility
equations $f_{ij}R_j+\Delta_{i0}=0$ give
$$R_B=\frac{265}{378}\,wL=0.7011\,wL,\qquad
R_C=\frac{125}{378}\,wL=0.3307\,wL.$$
Vertical equilibrium of the whole beam, whose total load is $wL$, then fixes the
reaction at the built-in end,
$$R_D=wL-R_B-R_C=-\tfrac{2}{63}\,wL=\boxed{-0.0317\,wL},$$
a hold-down: the last span is so lightly loaded that the built-in end
must pull the beam down.
Bending moment ordinates for (a). Working from the free end
with $M(x)=\sum R_i\langle x-x_i\rangle-\sum w\langle\cdot\rangle^{2}/2$,
the governing sagging ordinates are
$$M_B=-\frac{wL^{2}}{18}=-0.0556\,wL^{2},\qquad
M_C=-\frac{4wL^{2}}{189}=-0.0212\,wL^{2},\qquad
M_D=+\frac{2wL^{2}}{189}=+0.0106\,wL^{2}.$$
Inside the loaded strip of span BC the shear vanishes at $x=1.0344L$ from the
free end, where the moment reaches its largest sagging value
$\boxed{M_{\max}=+0.0235\,wL^{2}}$. The diagram crosses zero at
$x=0.546L$, $1.251L$ and exactly $2.000L$ — the last of these is the
point of contraflexure in the unloaded span CD, whose moment varies linearly
because the shear there is constant.
Shear ordinates for (a). The overhang shear grows linearly
to $-wL/3=-0.333\,wL$ just left of B, jumps by $R_B$ to $+0.368\,wL$, falls
linearly to $+0.034\,wL$ where the first load block ends, stays constant to
$x=L$, falls again to $-0.299\,wL$ just left of C, jumps by $R_C$ to
$+0.032\,wL$ and stays constant to D. The constant shear over the whole of CD
is the numerical statement that span CD carries no load at all.
Structure (b): a symmetric frame carrying an anti-symmetric pair of tip loads. The centre line is an axis of anti-symmetry.
Structure (b) is the classic anti-symmetry problem. An upward $P$ at
the left tip mirrors into a downward $P$ at the right tip, so the loading is
anti-symmetric about the centre line and the response must be anti-symmetric
too: the two joints rotate through the same angle $\theta$, both
columns sway through the same $\Delta$, and neither column top can translate
vertically because the columns are inextensible.
Prove the column shear is zero. There is no net horizontal
load, so the two base shears sum to zero; anti-symmetry makes them equal, hence
each is zero and $M_{12}+M_{21}=0$ in every column. Substituting the
slope-deflection expressions for a fixed-base column of height $h$,
$$\frac{2EI}{h}\left(3\theta-6\psi\right)=0\;\Longrightarrow\;
\psi=\frac{\theta}{2},\qquad M_{21}=\frac{EI\theta}{h}=-M_{12}.$$
Joint equilibrium. The cantilevered tips are determinate:
each delivers a shear $P$ and a couple $Pa$ to its joint. With
$\theta_2=\theta_3=\theta$ and no chord rotation in the clear span,
$M_{23}=M_{32}=6EI\theta/b$, and moment equilibrium of joint 2 gives
$$\frac{EI\theta}{h}+\frac{6EI\theta}{b}=-Pa
\;\Longrightarrow\;EI\theta=-\frac{Pabh}{b+6h}.$$
Ordinates for (b). Hence
$$\boxed{M_{\text{column}}=\frac{Pab}{b+6h}}\quad\text{(equal and opposite
at the two ends of each column)},\qquad
\boxed{M_{\text{span end}}=\frac{6Pah}{b+6h}},$$
with $M=\pm Pa$ where the overhangs meet the joints and a linear span diagram
that passes through zero at midspan. The overhang shear is $P$, the clear-span
shear is the constant $12Pah/[b(b+6h)]$, the column shear and the horizontal
reactions are exactly zero, and the base moments are $Pab/(b+6h)$. As a check
the two contributions add to the applied couple:
$Pab/(b+6h)+6Pah/(b+6h)=Pa$.
Structure (c): two-storey frame with the top beam pinned to both columns. Symmetric structure under symmetric load, so there is no sway.
Structure (c) — kill the sway first. Structure and
loading are both symmetric, so the horizontal translation of every joint is
zero and all chord rotations vanish. The joint rotations are equal and opposite,
$\theta_3=-\theta_2$, which reduces the intermediate beam to the modified
stiffness $2EI/L$ and leaves a single unknown $\theta_2$.
Assemble the one joint equation. The lower column
contributes $4EI/h_1$ (fixed base), the upper column contributes the pinned-end
value $3EI/h_2$, the beam contributes $2EI/L$ and the midspan load supplies
$\mathrm{FEM}=PL/8$:
$$\theta_2=-\frac{PL/8}{\dfrac{4EI}{h_1}+\dfrac{3EI}{h_2}+\dfrac{2EI}{L}}.$$
Taking the drawing's near-square proportions $h_1=h_2=L=h$ as a
representative case gives $EI\theta_2=-Ph^{2}/72$ and the ordinates
$$\boxed{M_{\text{beam end}}=-\tfrac{7}{72}Ph},\qquad
M_{\text{beam midspan}}=+\tfrac{11}{72}Ph,\qquad
M_{\text{lower col, top}}=-\tfrac{1}{18}Ph,\qquad
M_{\text{lower col, base}}=+\tfrac{1}{36}Ph.$$
The upper storey is the informative part. Because the top
beam is pin-connected at both ends it is simply supported: its moment diagram is
the plain triangle peaking at $\boxed{PL/4}$ and it delivers only $P/2$
vertically to each column top, with no moment. The upper column therefore
carries a moment that falls linearly from $3EI\theta_2/h_2=-Ph/24$ at the
intermediate joint to exactly zero at the pin, and a constant shear
$P/24$ per unit $h$; the two upper column shears are equal and opposite and are
equilibrated by axial force in the top beam. The lower columns carry
$P/12$ of shear, again equal and opposite.