Question 6 of 8: Sway Frame with an Overhang by the Slope-Deflection Method
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. National Examinations, May 2016 — 98-Civ-B1 Advanced Structural Analysis, three hours, closed book (an approved Sharp or Casio calculator is permitted). Questions 1 and 2 are compulsory at 8 marks each; the candidate then answers two of Questions 3, 4 or 5 and two of Questions 6, 7 or 8 at 21 marks each, so six questions make a complete paper of 100 marks. All eight questions are worked here, because this set is a study resource rather than a sat examination.
Reference texts. R. C. Hibbeler, Structural Analysis, 10th ed. (Ch. 6 influence lines, Ch. 9 virtual work and Castigliano, Ch. 10 force method, Ch. 11 slope-deflection, Ch. 12 moment distribution, Ch. 16 stiffness method for frames); A. Kassimali, Structural Analysis, 6th ed.; A. Ghali, A. M. Neville & T. G. Brown, Structural Analysis: A Unified Classical and Matrix Approach, 7th ed.; J. C. McCormac, Structural Analysis: Using Classical and Matrix Methods, 4th ed. Canadian design context for the same structures: CSA S16, CSA A23.3 and the National Building Code of Canada 2020.
Check: sign conventions used throughout. Slope-deflection and moment-distribution end moments \(M_{ij}\) and joint rotations \(\theta\) are clockwise positive (Hibbeler), and the chord rotation \(\psi_{ij}\) is positive when the member chord rotates clockwise. Internal bending moments are plotted sagging positive, converted from the end moments by \(M_{\text{sag}}(i)=M_{ij}\) at the near end and \(M_{\text{sag}}(j)=-M_{ji}\) at the far end. Truss bar forces are tension positive.
Question 6: Sway Frame with an Overhang by the Slope-Deflection Method (21 marks)
uniform EI, inextensible; horizontal motion free at 1, 2, 3
Find. All member end moments, the sway of the frame, the support reactions, and the shear force and bending moment diagrams with their extreme ordinates.
Question 6 — roller at joint 1, free tip at joint 3 and one column fully built in at joint 4. Horizontal motion of joints 1, 2 and 3 is unrestrained, so the frame is free to sway. Uniform EI, inextensible.
Approach. Reduce the determinate overhang to a known joint moment and shear, treat the roller end with modified stiffness, and take the two unknowns as \(\theta_2\) and the sway \(\Delta\). The second equation is the horizontal shear condition on the single column, which because no horizontal load is applied reads simply “column shear = 0”.
Dispose of the overhang. The 2 m cantilever beyond joint 2 is determinate. It hands the joint$$M_{23} = -\frac{w a^{2}}{2} = -\frac{2(2)^{2}}{2} = -4.00\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m},\qquad V_{2^+} = +wa = +4.00\ \text{kN}$$and adds no degree of freedom to the problem.
Count the unknowns. Joint 1 is a roller at a beam end, so \(M_{12} = 0\) and \(\theta_1\) can be eliminated with the modified stiffness \(3EI/L\). Joint 4 is built in. Vertical inextensibility of the column fixes \(v_2 = 0\), and there is no vertical restraint to fight, so the unknowns are$$\theta_2 \quad\text{and}\quad \Delta \ (\text{the horizontal sway of the beam line}),\qquad \psi_{24} = \Delta/4$$
Slope-deflection equations. With the fixed-end moment of a propped span, \(wL^{2}/8\), for the modified member 2–1:$$M_{21} = \tfrac{3EI}{12}\theta_2 + \frac{wL^{2}}{8} = 0.25EI\,\theta_2 + 36.0$$$$M_{24} = \tfrac{2EI}{4}\left(2\theta_2 - 3\psi\right) = EI\theta_2 - 1.5EI\psi,\qquad M_{42} = \tfrac{2EI}{4}\left(\theta_2 - 3\psi\right) = 0.5EI\theta_2 - 1.5EI\psi$$
The sway (shear) equation. No horizontal force is applied anywhere and the roller cannot supply one, so the storey shear carried by the only column must vanish:$$V_{\text{col}} = -\frac{M_{24}+M_{42}}{4} = 0 \;\Longrightarrow\; 1.5EI\theta_2 - 3EI\psi = 0 \;\Longrightarrow\; \psi = 0.5\,\theta_2$$This is the key simplification: the frame does sway, but it sways exactly enough to leave the column shear-free.
Moment equilibrium at joint 2 and the solution.$$M_{21} + M_{23} + M_{24} = 0$$$$0.25EI\theta_2 + 36.0 - 4.0 + EI\theta_2 - 1.5EI(0.5\theta_2) = 0 \;\Longrightarrow\; 0.5EI\theta_2 = -32.0$$$$EI\,\theta_2 = \boxed{-64.0\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}^{2}},\qquad EI\,\Delta = 4EI\psi = \boxed{-128\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}^{3}}$$The negative sway means the beam line translates to the left. No numerical \(EI\) is quoted in the question, so the displacement is properly reported as \(128/EI\) metres to the left.
End moments. Substituting back,$$M_{21} = 0.25(-64) + 36 = \boxed{+20.0\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}},\qquad M_{23} = -4.0,\qquad M_{24} = -64 + 48 = -16.0$$$$M_{42} = -32 + 48 = +16.0\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}$$Joint 2 balances: \(20.0 - 4.0 - 16.0 = 0\). Because \(M_{24}+M_{42} = 0\), the column carries a constant moment of 16.0 kN·m over its whole height and no shear at all — the shape a careless sketch always gets wrong.
Reactions and shears. Working along the beam with \(M_{\text{sag}}(2) = -20.0\),$$R_1 = \frac{wL^{2}/2 - 20.0}{L} = \frac{144-20}{12} = \boxed{10.33\ \text{kN (up)}}$$$$V(12^-) = 10.33 - 24 = -13.67\ \text{kN},\qquad V(12^+) = +4.00\ \text{kN}$$so the jump of 17.67 kN at joint 2 is the axial force taken by the column, which also equals \(2(14) - 10.33\). At the built-in base$$N_4 = 17.67\ \text{kN},\qquad H_4 = 0,\qquad M_4 = 16.0\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}$$
Extreme ordinates of the diagrams. In the main span the shear passes through zero at$$x = \frac{R_1}{w} = \frac{10.33}{2} = 5.167\ \text{m from joint 1}$$where the sagging moment peaks at$$M_{\max} = R_1 x - \frac{w x^{2}}{2} = \boxed{+26.69\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}}$$The moment then falls to \(-20.0\) at joint 2, and on the overhang runs parabolically from \(-4.0\) at joint 2 to zero at the free tip. The column is a constant \(-16.0\) throughout.
Question 6 — bending moment diagram for the beam 1–2–3, sagging positive; the column carries a constant −16 kN·m over its full height.
Question 6 — shear force diagram for the beam; the 17.67 kN jump at joint 2 is the axial force taken by the column.
Quantity
Value
Rotation of joint 2 (clockwise positive)
\(EI\theta_2 = -64.0\)
Sway of the beam line
\(\Delta = 128/EI\) to the left
\(M_{21}\) / \(M_{23}\) / \(M_{24}\) / \(M_{42}\)
+20.0 / −4.0 / −16.0 / +16.0 kN·m
Roller reaction \(R_1\)
10.33 kN up
Column axial force
17.67 kN compression
Column moment and shear
constant 16.0 kN·m; shear = 0; \(H_4 = 0\)
Maximum sagging moment
+26.69 kN·m at 5.167 m from joint 1
Beam shear extremes
+10.33 kN at joint 1; −13.67 kN just left of joint 2; +4.00 kN just right