NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

16-Civ-B1 Advanced Structural Analysis · December 2018

Question 5 of 9: Slope-deflection — trapezoidal frame with a settling support

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

National Examinations — December 2018. 16-Civ-B1, Advanced Structural Analysis. Three hours, closed book (approved Casio or Sharp calculator only). Nine questions on seven pages: Questions 1 and 2 are compulsory (12 and 8 marks); the candidate then answers TWO of Questions 3, 4 or 5 (18 marks each) and TWO of Questions 6, 7, 8 or 9 (22 marks each), so six questions make a complete paper of 100 marks. Because this set is a study resource, all nine questions are solved here.

Reference texts. R. C. Hibbeler, Structural Analysis, 10th ed. (Pearson) — Ch. 6 influence lines, Ch. 8–9 deflections and virtual work, Ch. 10 force (flexibility) method, Ch. 11 slope-deflection, Ch. 12 moment distribution, Ch. 15–16 matrix stiffness. A. Kassimali, Structural Analysis, 6th ed. (Cengage) — Ch. 7 Castigliano and least work, Ch. 8 influence lines, Ch. 13 slope-deflection, Ch. 17–18 matrix stiffness. A. Ghali, A. M. Neville and T. G. Brown, Structural Analysis: A Unified Classical and Matrix Approach, 7th ed. (CRC). Canadian context for the support-settlement questions: NBC 2020 Part 4 and CSA S6:19 treat differential settlement as an imposed deformation to be combined with the permanent loads, so the self-equilibrating moment sets computed in Questions 1(c), 5 and 7 are real design actions, not curiosities.

Check: representative dimensions in Questions 1 and 2. The source prints no dimensions on any of the five structures in Questions 1 and 2 — they are labelled “schematically show”. Every shape, every zero and every discontinuity below is dimension-independent and is what the marker is looking for. To put real numbers on the ordinates, representative dimensions have been adopted in the drawn proportions and are stated with each part; they are declared here rather than presented as data read off the paper.

Question 5: Slope-deflection — trapezoidal frame with a settling support (18 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given. A symmetric trapezoidal frame. Joint ① is a roller at ground level; joint ② is a pin support at the top-left corner; joint ③ is a roller support at the top-right corner; joint ④ is a roller at ground level. The inclined legs rise 3.6 m over a 4.8 m run (6.0 m long, a 3-4-5 triangle) and the top member spans 8.0 m.

Given data
QuantitySymbolValue
Leg length (rise 3.6 m, run 4.8 m)L12, L346.0 m
Top memberL238.0 m
Imposed settlement of joint ③δ12.0 mm downward
Flexural rigidity, all membersEI3.6 × 10⁵ kN·m²
Applied loads—none

Find. The end moments, reactions, shear-force and bending-moment diagrams produced by the imposed settlement alone.

settles 12 mm1234leg 6.0 m8.0 mrise 3.6 m; horizontal offsets 4.8 m / 8.0 m / 4.8 m
Question 5 — roller, pin, roller, roller. Five reaction components against three equations makes the frame two degrees indeterminate, which is exactly why an imposed settlement stresses it.

Approach. With no external load the entire answer comes from kinematics: fix the imposed and inextensibility-driven displacements first, convert them to chord rotations, then write two joint-moment equations in the two unknown rotations. Both outer joints are single-member ends free to rotate, so use the modified stiffness 3EI/L there and drop their rotations from the unknowns.

  1. Fix the displacement field. The pin at ② holds that joint in both directions. The top member is inextensible and horizontal, so \(u_{3} = u_{2} = 0\); the left leg is inextensible with both its ends already fixed vertically, so \(u_{1} = 0\). Only joint ④ can move, and the inextensible right leg forces $$u_{4} = \dfrac{\delta\,h}{r} = \dfrac{0.012 \times 3.6}{4.8} = \boxed{9.00\ \text{mm outward}}$$ This spreading of the base is the physical heart of the question: a 12 mm drop at the top pushes the foot out by 9 mm.
  2. Convert to chord rotations. Using \(\psi_{ij} = (\mathbf{d}_{j} - \mathbf{d}_{i})\cdot\mathbf{e}_{2}/L\) with \(\mathbf{e}_{2}\) the member axis turned 90° counter-clockwise, $$\psi_{12} = 0, \qquad \psi_{23} = -\dfrac{\delta}{L_{23}} = -1.500 \times 10^{-3}, \qquad \psi_{34} = \dfrac{\delta}{r} = +2.500 \times 10^{-3}$$ The left leg is unaffected because neither of its ends moves; the right leg feels the largest rotation of the three.
  3. Write the two joint equations. With \(3EI/L_{\text{leg}} = EI/2\) and \(2EI/L_{23} = EI/4\), joint ② and joint ③ give $$\theta_{2} + 0.25\theta_{3} = -1.125 \times 10^{-3}, \qquad 0.25\theta_{2} + \theta_{3} = +0.125 \times 10^{-3}$$
  4. Solve. $$\theta_{2} = -1.2333 \times 10^{-3}\ \text{rad}, \qquad \theta_{3} = +0.4333 \times 10^{-3}\ \text{rad}$$ The two rotations have opposite signs, which is the frame folding about the settling corner.
  5. Recover the end moments. $$M_{21} = \dfrac{3EI}{L}\theta_{2} = \boxed{-222.0\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}}, \qquad M_{23} = +222.0\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}$$ $$M_{32} = \boxed{+372.0\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}}, \qquad M_{34} = -372.0\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}$$ with \(M_{12} = M_{43} = 0\) at the two roller ends. Each joint balances exactly, which is the only free check available on a load-free problem.
  6. Shears from the end moments. No member carries a span load, so each shear is constant and equal to \((M_{ij} + M_{ji})/L\): $$V_{12} = \dfrac{222.0}{6} = 37.00\ \text{kN}, \quad V_{23} = \dfrac{222.0 + 372.0}{8} = 74.25\ \text{kN}, \quad V_{34} = \dfrac{372.0}{6} = 62.00\ \text{kN}$$
  7. Reactions, and why they must sum to zero. $$R_{1} = -46.25\ \text{kN}, \quad R_{2} = +120.50\ \text{kN}, \quad R_{3} = -151.75\ \text{kN}, \quad R_{4} = +77.50\ \text{kN}$$ There is no applied load, so this set is self-equilibrating: the four values sum to zero and their moments about any point sum to zero. Two of the four are hold-downs — a settlement of a redundant support does not push down on that support, it drags the whole frame with it, and the anchorage has to be designed for the reversal.
-222.00372.00Bending moment (kN·m), ordinates normal to each member
Question 5 bending moment. Every member is straight (no span loads) and the diagram closes to zero at the two roller ends.
Question 5 — results
QuantityValue
Outward movement of joint ④9.00 mm
θ2−1.2333 × 10−3 rad
θ3+0.4333 × 10−3 rad
Moment at joint ②222.0 kN·m (both members)
Moment at joint ③372.0 kN·m (both members) — maximum
Moment at joints ① and ④0 (roller ends)
Shear, leg ①–②37.00 kN
Shear, top member74.25 kN (maximum)
Shear, leg ③–④62.00 kN
Reactions ① / ② / ③ / ④−46.25 / +120.50 / −151.75 / +77.50 kN